Stinky-Finger Joe

F

Flanders

Verified User
In 1993, Reade alleges, Biden pinned her against a wall, reached under her clothes, and penetrated her with his fingers.


​
How Uncertainty Became a Weapon in the Tara Reade Story
Megan Garber
May 5, 2020

https://www.theatlantic.com/culture/archive/2020/05/tara-reade-joe-biden-metoo-essentialism/611116/
​

I get the feeling that the Biden story degenerated into a reminder that there was once a FOX mouth named Megyn Kelly:



Will Ms. Reade's disclosure revive Kelly’s career? Stay tuned for the answer if Stinker-Finger Joe goes down in flames before November.
 
Flanders said:
In 1993, Reade alleges, Biden pinned her against a wall, reached under her clothes, and penetrated her with his fingers.
Click to expand...

Nobody on the left believes Tara Reade, except the women who say they do but will vote for stink-finger anyway.
 
This is the salient part:

“The response was both carefully worded and blithely misleading: The Times’ investigation into Reade’s account was by no means an exoneration of Biden. But his campaign’s impulse toward absolutism was revealing—not only of the campaign itself, but also of the way Reade’s allegation has been metabolized by the American public. In the story the Biden campaign was referring to—reported over a span of roughly two weeks and bearing the notably hesitant headline “Examining Tara Reade’s Sexual Assault Allegation Against Joe Biden”—the Times did not make broad claims about whether the assault, as Reade had described it, had taken place. What the paper shared, instead, was something much more hedged: Its investigation had been unable to corroborate Reade’s assertion. The Times’ story was comprehensive but not definitive; it recognized, implicitly, that there is more reporting to be done on the matter. But the campaign’s talking points took the result of that effort and turned it into something strident: Case closed.”

The left lied when they said the Times article exonerated stinky finger, senile, old Uncle Joe.
The Times had to later post that it did not exonerate him.
 

RATS: NO PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE FOR A NOMINEE​


A video clip from a 2019 Joe Biden appearance on "The View" shows the RAT presidential nominee saying that there was no need to prove any allegations against Justice Kavanaugh "beyond a reasonable doubt," since he was undergoing a "job interview" and not criminal proceedings.



https://disrn.com/news/view-clip-surfaces-of-biden-saying-no-need-to-prove-kavanaugh-allegations-beyond-reasonable-doubt
 
Why is stinky finger, senile, old Uncle Joe not allowing the Senate records held at the university to be released?

What is he hiding?

The DNC has already bleach cleaned those records.

What are they afraid of?

Evidence of obstruction of justice....the cleansing of the records?
 
EXW3v_UUwAAK2mw.jpg
 
Biden is accused by one women with a changing story. Trump proudly admitted he grabbed women by the pussy and has 25 women claiming abuse. This one is easy. Trump has no respect for women. He sees them as sexual objects. You rightys have nothing.
 
This thread is about stinky finger, senile, old Uncle Joe.

There are plenty of threads about the president.

Stay on topic.
 
I do not "b'lieve teh wimmen" in this case.
Nor any of most of the others, seriously.

Why didn't this come out years ago?
Does that nomination possibly have something to do with it? Hmm?
 
Matt Dillon said:
I do not "b'lieve teh wimmen" in this case.
Nor any of most of the others, seriously.

Why didn't this come out years ago?
Does that nomination possibly have something to do with it? Hmm?
Click to expand...

Ms. Reade does not want a sexual predator, stinky-finger, senile, old Uncle Joe as her president. I do not either.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top