What do Nazi and Confederate Flags have to do with ending the lockdown?

LV426 said:
Isn't it funny how Conservatives always end up referencing popular Hollywood media as the basis of their arguments, while also saying Hollywood is responsible for the country's moral decay or some stupid shit?
Click to expand...

Isn't it funny how your reading comprehension of posts is so low?
 
LV426 said:
Ummm...they do that to black people all the time.

In fact, it happened just a few weeks ago in Jacksonville and Chicago:

https://www.news4jax.com/news/local...arks-large-protest-in-brunswick-neighborhood/

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/chicag...er-shooting-unarmed-subway-rider-ariel-roman/

The guy in Chicago was shot in the back.




It's cute that you believe this.

But let's follow this through to its natural conclusion; so if police are allowed to shoot if they are in immediate danger, wouldn't the fact that Nazis are considered a national threat mean they are inherently dangerous?
Click to expand...

Fake news.
 
RB 60 said:
Nope. The Navy sent her there. It's her "job."

Yep, I have a GF. I've always had a social charisma when it came to the ladies, something you obviously lack.
You could try and hit up guno or domer76, they seem to be your type. Don't expect acceptance, though...
Click to expand...

So you are sponging off your girlfriend. How long will she put up this I wonder?
 
LV426 said:
As I've said before, the point of the Into the Night sock is to spam threads with bad faith responses in the hopes that the debate will be frustrated so all the shitty points made by the people Into the Night is protecting are never addressed.

They consider that a success because they have no personal standards, nor are they really into self-accountability. Every lie that goes out there unchallenged is a victory for them.
Click to expand...

YALSA. Bulverism fallacy.
 
LV426 said:
Yes, you have defended Nazis. Over and over. You have defended them by elevating and equating them with "the left". You do that by casually dismissing them as "small" or "no political power", and then when you do elevate them to compare them to ISIS, you suddenly reverse course on how to deal with them.

You do that to maintain this phony bOtHsIdErIsM because it's the only way you can be part of a discussion, of which you have no meaningful perspective to contribute or offer.

That's what guides all of your posts here; this compulsion to set yourself above everyone else by pretending it's all the same, either because you are incredibly lazy (which is what I think of you) or you are incredibly fearful that you're not as intuitive as you think you are.

So that's why you play dumb, or reduce everything to its most base and common denominator. I think that's intentional because you're just not a good person.
Click to expand...

Lie.
 
LV426 said:
They're not a different question...extremism is extremism.

And we have dropped bombs on "extremist groups" in this country before (Philadelphia, 1985: https://www.vox.com/the-highlight/2019/8/8/20747198/philadelphia-bombing-1985-move).

And we have illegally detained citizens, tortured them, and denied them due process (Gitmo, 2001-present: https://theintercept.com/2019/06/21/guantanamo-bay-indefinite-detention/).

And we also have cops shooting people they think are a threat (Chicago, 2 months ago: https://apnews.com/6d264b727ffdb6077c651730d2e45561).

Well, there's no better justification for shooting someone than them being "a national threat", right?
Click to expand...

Condoning murder.
 
Flash said:
It is "mere advocacy" and you can advocate anything you want as long as no action is taken toward that act.[Supreme Court of the United States]

What genocide are you talking about? I don't think any group has been wiped out in recent years in the U. S.
Click to expand...

The 1st Amendment is the authoritative reference here, not the Supreme Court.
 
Flash said:
You think that gives law enforcement the power to kill them? You completely misunderstand the meaning of a "national threat." They still have the same rights as every other group. Nothing can be done unless they commit a crime or conspire to do so.
Click to expand...

Correct.
 
LV426 said:
They're not a different question...extremism is extremism.

And we have dropped bombs on "extremist groups" in this country before (Philadelphia, 1985: https://www.vox.com/the-highlight/2019/8/8/20747198/philadelphia-bombing-1985-move).

And we have illegally detained citizens, tortured them, and denied them due process (Gitmo, 2001-present: https://theintercept.com/2019/06/21/guantanamo-bay-indefinite-detention/).

And we also have cops shooting people they think are a threat (Chicago, 2 months ago: https://apnews.com/6d264b727ffdb6077c651730d2e45561).

Well, there's no better justification for shooting someone than them being "a national threat", right?
Click to expand...

Shove your propaganda the first one was a police stand off where they fired on police exercising legal arrest warrants, nobody was tortured at Gitmo, waterboarding isn't torched you little pussy and anyone sent there was the member of a foreign terrorist orgnization, hell Obama extrajudicially executed US citizens overseas, and spare me your BLM terrorist propaganda the body cam footage exonerates the cops against black thug bullshit in 99.9% of cases the little shit was brandishing a blade, play stupid games win stupid prizes. In all of your cases police used force against criminals due to their crimes, not because of their political views you fascist pig, go goosestep off a fucking cliff.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top