Ok those on the left here is your chance.

Is the corona virus death toll be used as a political tool?

  • YES

    Votes: 13 61.9%
  • NO

    Votes: 7 33.3%
  • DON'T KNOW

    Votes: 1 4.8%

  • Total voters
    21
  • Poll closed .
Putting aside the death toll, the virus is still overwhelming hospitals because of people getting tested or treated. So the numbers should be considered before opening states.

Complete lie probably told to you by CNN. Most hospitals have emptied out since height of the pandemic. Some are even laying off staff.
 
Ah so you don't know.

It doesn't matter the overall population you have to look at deaths per million. Theirs is way lower. We are lower than Italy even though we've had more deaths. Bet that blew your mind huh, dolt.

As long as you don't drop dead,then you don't give a fuck
 
I know what you meant. I just want specifics. For example, Democrats are using coronavirus to try to hurt Trump, no matter if the economy tanks and it kills people.
That's quite a whopper.

Liar.

PoliTalker:

"Dive, market, DIVE!

Take DT down with you.

McCarthy said if you like this economy you must vote not to impeach.

As if that had anything to do with guilt or innocence.

Are we to now believe that if the corona virus hit the stock market earlier that DT would have been convicted?"


02-28-2020, 06:47 AM #5 | Top
PoliTalker


"Sometimes things have to get worse before they can get better.

We're going down.

BZZZZZT! BZZZZZT! BZZZZZT!

Dive! Dive! Dive!"
 
You are forgetting about herd immunity, there is substantial evidence to suggest that it is achieved once 10-20% of the populace is infected. Which means that all.of the lockdown measures and the destruction of world economies was mostly futile. That arsehole Neil Ferguson has a lot to answer for, in my opinion.

https://app.spectator.co.uk/2020/05...er-cent-of-people-to-be-infected/content.html

No, I'm not forgetting about it. There is nothing to suggest it is present in the US, and of course, because we have an incompetent administration, we can't test for it anyway.
 
You are forgetting about herd immunity and Farr's Law, there is substantial evidence to suggest that it is achieved once 10-20% of the populace is infected. Which means that all.of the lockdown measures and the destruction of world economies was mostly futile. That arsehole Neil Ferguson has a lot to answer for, in my opinion.



https://app.spectator.co.uk/2020/05...er-cent-of-people-to-be-infected/content.html

If you want to hang your hat on this, go right ahead. The number is probably around 70% according to EVERYONE ELSE.
 
This is a question about Trump or me.
But about your lack of concern for deaths from the pandemic

Nice try I never said I wasn't concerned about the mortalities. I said they had no bearing on when to ease social restrictions. That is determined by the reduction in new cases not deaths. Sadly that goes over your head.
 
Putting aside the death toll, the virus is still overwhelming hospitals because of people getting tested or treated. So the numbers should be considered before opening states.

That is exactly what I said except that most states healthcare facilities are not being overwhelmed.
 
Nice try I never said I wasn't concerned about the mortalities. I said they had no bearing on when to ease social restrictions. That is determined by the reduction in new cases not deaths. Sadly that goes over your head.

Deaths have no bearing on when to open up?
But you're concerned about mortalites.
Twisted logic.And of course you are incapable of debate without personal attacks.
Meaning you're incapable of debate.
Just a school yard bully.
 
EXMIQdNU4AAQtMy.jpg
 
Deaths have no bearing on when to open up?
But you're concerned about mortalites.
Twisted logic.And of course you are incapable of debate without personal attacks.
Meaning you're incapable of debate.
Just a school yard bully.

OK I'll play your silly game you tell me how the death rate figures into when to ease restrictions. You made the charge no prove it.
BTW there was no personal attack in my reply above, just facts.
 
That is exactly what I said except that most states healthcare facilities are not being overwhelmed.

The only tricky part is that in some states, the big cities are being overwhelmed, but this rest of the state isn't. So maybe in certain states, they could allow the local mayors to make the decision.
 
Back
Top