Biden calls for more 'economic intercourse' around the world

No doubt Biden could run circles around Trump on any international matters. Trump is a Reality TV show host, not an international diplomat.

Even so, that doesn't make Biden fit to be President....it just makes him fitter than Trump. "The lesser of two evils" is not a good way to select the President of the United States.
dumbest thing you've posted yet. Biden's idea of "diplomacy" is giving away the general store.
Can you even imagine him going up against China in trade negotiations?
to this day he still says "China is not our competitor". :palm:

Biden would never attempt anything like trying to get NK to denuke -a semi-successful effort by Trump as well
(no more ICBM's)
You'll be hearing much more of 'Beijing Biden" from the Trump campaign
 
No, just very nearly Red Pilled lol.

The bulk of the media is in bed with the same establishment you rail against. They hate Trump and will literally print/say anything about him in order to get rid of him. They fear Bernie and hold Bernie supporters in similar ‘esteem’ they do Trump supporters.

You’re better off recognizing it for what it is.

I'm so red pilled that I'm nearly black pilled.
No, they don't hate Trump. Why would they? He's made them richer. Trump is unique in that we've never had a president this dumb, but his policies are pretty standard.
 
Just not as much when it's a Democrat. :)

Untrue. I hated to see Franken go, for instance, but he had to resign.

I've noticed that more than one RWNJ on this site is sure that Ms. Reade is truthful. She's truthful because the accusations are against a (D) politician, of course. Dr. Ford accusing Beer Me Kavanaugh, otoh, was clearly "unwell" and "should seek help" because "everyone knows that kids [and left-leaning women] make up stuff for revenge." :laugh:

I don't know if Biden did it or not. Let's do a one-week, very limited investigation ala Kavanaugh and find out!
 
Me too
I do not actually think Donald Trump could say anything Intelligent about US foreign policy in Africa if he was asked off the cuff to talk about it with no notes or preparation. I doubt the Donald could even name ten subsaharan African countries.

I am positive Joe Biden could off the cuff natter on competently about African policy for 30 minutes if he had to
trump would filibuster, saying nothing in the process
 
What's hilarious is when amatuer, armchair policy "experts" get uppity enough to assume they know more than a former 36 year US Senator and two term VP.
ROFL..show me some foreign policy successes from the Obama adm! There are none. Libya, arming Syrian rebels, rolling over for China and Russian sanctions were all disasters. .Biden isn't a player -he has no clue of economic nationalism as well

Too bad you didn't get it when you posted the thread.

Funny how someone who contorts himself like a pretzel to defend every idiotic verbal gaffe that comes out of Trump's ass via his mouth is suddenly so critical of grammatical choices by someone else.

Biden assumed he was talking to adults.
actually I don't defend Trump's gaffes/ But I don't obsess over them either. they are just off the cuff words.
I do defend his POLICIES -which have been outstanding for the most part
 
Sorry, dude, but the OP is just the Biden quote. The apparent source of the quote is irrelevant as long as it is an accurate quote. Was it accurate?

I'd be happy to have all candidates undergo a fully psychological evaluation with all results made public. Let the public see what they are getting. :)

Again, I have no doubt Biden knows more about international politics than Trump.

Heck, even a first year PoliSci major knows more than Trump.

Links should be always given so that the context and content can be independently confirmed

I guess I should expand on what I wrote. .
When I wrote that Biden could speak off the cuff competently about Africa policy, I was using the word "competent" by the standards expected of a leader. They should be able to speak knowlegably about a topic with confidence, authority, and gravitas.

An 18 year old poli sci major put on national TV and asked to speak off the cuff for thirty minutes would be a deer in the headlights - sweaty palms, shaky voice, nervous stutters - and they would not inspire the slighest confidence.
 
Me too
I do not actually think Donald Trump could say anything Intelligent about US foreign policy in Africa if he was asked off the cuff to talk about it with no notes or preparation. I doubt the Donald could even name ten subsaharan African countries.

I am positive Joe Biden could off the cuff natter on competently about African policy for 30 minutes if he had to
Biden doesn't even know Where the fuck he is half the time!

he dissembles and his sentences trail off and has trouble completing his thoughts -i'dlove to hear him defend Libya.
It would be some hackneyed garbage like "liberation" -while ignoring the permanent damage Obama and Hillary did facilitating the creation of a failed terrorist ridden state
 
But, that would show his ignorance, well, to everyone not a Trumpcultist, who think he’s brilliant.
The cultists, like trump, would claim that the moderator was 'being mean to him'.

The Independents who took a chance on trump in '16, would shake their heads and question their vote. As they have since his inauguration
 
I'm so red pilled that I'm nearly black pilled.
No, they don't hate Trump. Why would they? He's made them richer. Trump is unique in that we've never had a president this dumb, but his policies are pretty standard.
they hate him they obfuscate any successes, and politicize anything they possible can, then spin it and wash out any criticism of Pelosi or Shumer's inability to get things done
Sure it sells papers -and they like that -but they are much more interested in spreading liberal dogma then reportage
 
The cultists, like trump, would claim that the moderator was 'being mean to him'.

The Independents who took a chance on trump in '16, would shake their heads and question their vote. As they have since his inauguration
well see soon enough. The debates are gonna be fun. Assuming Biden can find out which city to go to of course.

Besides Trump has a successful track record -Biden can't point to much of anything except unemployment and Trump got that even lower
 
Ok, I actually agree with that.

The establishment/media loathes Trump but they don’t ‘fear’ him. They can put up with him if they are forced to. But they don’t fear Trump will turn the country into Venezuela [you probably don’t agree with that but that’s what fear about Bernie].

Using Venezuela as an example if perfect. The reason Socialism failed there is because America did what it always does when a country tries Socialism. They hit Venezuela with heavy sanctions and worked with Venezuelan Capitalists to sabotage the economy.
Now Bernie doesn't want the kind of Socialism Venezuela tried, he wants more of a mixed economy. But like with Venezuela, the American establishment is afraid this is going to work, so they sabotaged him.

So the establishment/media looks at Trump as the lesser of two evils but they clearly don’t ‘want’ either one of them. The only evidence you need to see is how the media props-up a candidate like Joe Biden. If there was an alternative to Biden [besides Bernie] the establishment media would Me2 him in a New York minute.

Why wouldn't the media want Trump? He's done everything the establishment wants. Maybe now they're pissed at him for causing a pandemic, but this will pass, and he'll go back to making the rich richer.
 
they hate him they obfuscate any successes, and politicize anything they possible can, then spin it and wash out any criticism of Pelosi or Shumer's inability to get things done
Sure it sells papers -and they like that -but they are much more interested in spreading liberal dogma then reportage

Stop watching Fox.
 
Everyone has to make their own choices in an election. I guess i am proud of every vote I have cast in the last 30 years.

Some people told me that Al Gore was basically no better than George Dumbya Bush, that John Kerry was not much better than Bush, and that Hillary Clinton was more corrupt than Donald Trump.

But the weird thing is, if my preferred candidates in those cases had won, I am convinced the nation would be substantially better off
Agreed people have to choose. Although I think being "proud" of doing one's civic duty is setting a low bar, one should definitely be ashamed of not voting.

Yes, all candidates will have their critics but there's a difference between "better than" and "unfit to serve".

I have no doubt the US would have been better off if GHW Bush had won reelection in 1992.
 
Back
Top