Robdawg invited to a GAY wedding in Connecticut!!!

R

Robdawg

Junior Member
2 of my very good friends, upon hearing the news of the legalization of gay marriage in CT have decided to get married. The wedding is dec6th...


shit i have to buy a gift
 
I'm shocked that you know gay people...

;)

Very cool. Watch out, people try to find their own spouse in such circumstances.
 
ib1yysguy said:
Since this is a message board, I assume I'm "talking" to whomever is reading, buttsteak.
Click to expand...

So what did you tell them exactly? I think most sane people understand the difference in logic between a judge ruling from a bench and two gay people marrying at an alter. You didn't explain how the logic is flawed, how it's stupid, or how it is hilarious. It's basically just a smart ass comment that doesn't make logical sense. I think you should get some mental help... it would be better than chortling to yourself on a message board.

Again... to Rob, Congrats to your friends, I hope you enjoy the wedding. Sorry dickbrain intruded on your celebratory thread with his insanity.
 
It's obvious how it's flawed. It doesn't follow. It needs no explanation to anyone not trying to scurry away from their own words (in this case, that's you).
 
dixie, I know how you operate. You're going to try your best to get me to detail for you very specifically why your logic is retarded. Then you're going to take one word from it and find a way to spin it so you can confuse the issue and change the subject.

I trust that most people here are smart enough to know why this is retarded:

ib1yysguy: And remember, gay marriage doesn't threaten traditional marriage. (and you claim you nor anyone you ever knew has ever argued that gay marriage threatens traditional marriage). Activist judges who may give gays the right to marry threaten traditional marriages!

dixie: Exactly!
 
ib1yysguy said:
dixie, I know how you operate. You're going to try your best to get me to detail for you very specifically why your logic is retarded. Then you're going to take one word from it and find a way to spin it so you can confuse the issue and change the subject.

I trust that most people here are smart enough to know why this is retarded:

ib1yysguy: And remember, gay marriage doesn't threaten traditional marriage. (and you claim you nor anyone you ever knew has ever argued that gay marriage threatens traditional marriage). Activist judges who may give gays the right to marry threaten traditional marriages!

dixie: Exactly!
Click to expand...

Gay Marriage, Gay Weddings, Animal/Human Weddings, People Marrying Mailboxes... do not threaten, change, endanger, alter, diminish, depreciate, or render meaningless, ANY "traditional" marriage. Do you follow that retard???? GOOD!!

Activist Judges who make law from the bench, against the will of the people, which redefines an age-old religious tradition and custom, and base it on sexual behavior and preference, does indeed "threaten" said religious tradition and custom. The custom is sacred and fundamental to the religious beliefs and practices of certain individuals, so it is a direct encroachment on the 1st Amendment rights of those who hold the tradition in sanctity as a vital part of their religious practice.

Providing you understand the difference between a judge and a gay couple, I don't see how you can derive any flaw in logic of what I have said. If you want to snicker and chortle your little stupidities on this subject, please start a new thread, Robdawg deserves the dignity and respect of keeping this thread clear of your idiotic chortles.
 
How many sides does your mouth have Dix?

Gay marriage doesn't threaten traditional marriage, but the judge that ruled on it does?

Okay, way to render yourself retarded, yet again, for the 111th time, in as many days.

Why don't you just spit it out Dix?

You don't want gay marriage because...........

(Put on your thinking cap! You can do it!)
 
Why the FUCK do you people insist on turning this thread into yet ANOTHER debate on Gay Marriage? Is it too fucking hard for you to respond to one of the 5,000 other threads on that subject? Do you have to ruin Rob's celebration thread for his friends? Why can't you just come here, post your congrats to Rob, and wish him well?
 
Dixie said:
I just explained it to the other retard Beefy, try reading it.
Click to expand...

Your explanation is " it doesn't threaten traditional marriage you pinhead, because it DOES threaten it you pinhead!"

You're once again, talking out both sides of your mouth.
 
Beefy said:
Your explanation is " it doesn't threaten traditional marriage you pinhead, because it DOES threaten it you pinhead!"

You're once again, talking out both sides of your mouth.
Click to expand...

Nope, I'm not. Apparently you have a reading comprehension problem. Either that, or you think "Judicial Activist" = "Homosexual Couple"--They certainly don't appear synonymous to me, but maybe you have some twisted way of making those two things come out to be the same? I swear, trying to communicate with you retarded people is almost impossible sometimes.

Perhaps it would help if you thought about what judges do, that gay couples don't do. Maybe you should also ponder this... If a gay man marries a gay woman, is that not a "traditional marriage?" Also, are all "traditional marriages" sanctified by the Church and held sacred as a part of the fundamental religious beliefs of the Church?

You see... maybe I am odd, but I can see a distinct difference in what judges do and what gay couples do. I can also see a distinct difference between a "traditional" marriage, and a marriage ordained and sanctified by the church, and regarded as a fundamental part of their religious faith. In fact, in the other very lengthy thread on this topic, Sochead informed me how he and his wife were 'traditionally' married, although he is an Atheist.

Now, Beefhead, I realize you are fat and lazy as fuck, and don't have the courtesy to post in the appropriate threads about various topics, but I am done debating this here. If you need further schooling, you will have to either start a new thread or go to the old thread and post, because I will not respond to this anymore here. Again, Rob, I apologize for these rude people trashing your thread with their stupidity and ignorance.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top