Bernie wins New Hampshire!

Cinnabar said:
You would actually appreciate living in an authoritarian state wouldn't you? Well I live in NYC and I don't! And wtf makes your link more accurate than what I posted? Because it supports your narrative? The Post is a rag btw.

We Were Wrong about Stop-and-Frisk
Click to expand...

The Washington Post is a rag?

I think you're on the rag.

Permanently.
 
evince said:
they wont

they are being influenced by the Russians just like you are

you wont help us
Click to expand...

OK, but the question remains...you're going to need to increase turnout to around 60% if you want to have any hope of beating Trump.

So how are you going to get turnout up to 60% with a moderate candidate?
 
Cinnabar said:
The party has lost its principles, abandoned its roots and is corporate owned and deserves to implode. The future of the party is with the Progressives who are embracing their FDR roots...full stop.
Click to expand...

Exactly.

AOC, Omar, Pressly, Haaland, Khanna...all these young Democrats, who are the future of the party, are New Deal Democrats, not triangulated plutocrats.
 
evince said:
you sure seem to think she hates the Democratic party as much as you and bernie do
Click to expand...

It's interesting how you respond to criticism by taking it as hatred.

If the Democratic Party is so perfect, how come it lost 900 seats during Obama, lost the House in 2010, the Senate in 2014, and the White House in 2016?
 
Guest Post: Stop-and-frisk can be an effective crime-fighting tool, at the right time and place

Two social scientists say the controversial tactic may have had a positive impact in the high-crime 1990s

The police practice of “stop, question and frisk,” or “stop-and-frisk” — randomly checking citizens for drugs or guns — was used heavily by New York City police starting in the 1990s to deter or stop crime from happening. A combination of court rulings and the end of the tenure of Mayor Mike Bloomberg saw the number of stops plummet from nearly 700,000 in 2011 to about 10,000 in 2017. Bloomberg is now being criticized by some for supporting the practice, which many feel was racially biased. But two professors in public policy, Charles F. Manski of Northwestern University and Daniel S. Nagin of Carnegie Mellon University, argue here that the tactic may have been the right answer for crime in the 1990s, but less so in an era of greatly reduced crime.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/crime...ht-time-place/




and all the studies found it was the increase in officers and not the evil SnF part


read your won shit dude
 
two fuckers say what?


its not two studies


its two professors and it wont let me read it


the vast majority of studies on SnF said it fucked police relations with the honest people in the sectors of town


but MORE FEET ON THE BEAT reduced the crime
 
LV426 said:
So the Democrats didn't lose 900 seats during Obama?




What happened to those moderate Dems? Oh right, they all lost.

Do you...do you think Democrats gained seats from 2009-2016?
Click to expand...

THE REPUBLICANS CHEATED IN ELECTIONS DUDE


are you now going to defend republican cheating?
 
evince said:
Guest Post: Stop-and-frisk can be an effective crime-fighting tool, at the right time and place

Two social scientists say the controversial tactic may have had a positive impact in the high-crime 1990s

The police practice of “stop, question and frisk,” or “stop-and-frisk” — randomly checking citizens for drugs or guns — was used heavily by New York City police starting in the 1990s to deter or stop crime from happening. A combination of court rulings and the end of the tenure of Mayor Mike Bloomberg saw the number of stops plummet from nearly 700,000 in 2011 to about 10,000 in 2017. Bloomberg is now being criticized by some for supporting the practice, which many feel was racially biased. But two professors in public policy, Charles F. Manski of Northwestern University and Daniel S. Nagin of Carnegie Mellon University, argue here that the tactic may have been the right answer for crime in the 1990s, but less so in an era of greatly reduced crime.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/crime...ht-time-place/




and all the studies found it was the increase in officers and not the evil SnF part


read your won shit dude
Click to expand...

FOR FUCK'S SAKE..

The Obama Administration sued the policy in court and won, with the court saying the policy is unconstitutional.

Enough.

Any Democrat defending the Republican mayor's racist and unconstitutional program isn't a real Democrat.
 
LV426 said:
Exactly.

AOC, Omar, Pressly, Haaland, Khanna...all these young Democrats, who are the future of the party, are New Deal Democrats, not triangulated plutocrats.
Click to expand...

And more new wonderful Progressives coming in. Many incumbent establishment Dems are going to be facing tough primaries. Time to clean house.
 
evince said:
Guest Post: Stop-and-frisk can be an effective crime-fighting tool, at the right time and place

Two social scientists say the controversial tactic may have had a positive impact in the high-crime 1990s

The police practice of “stop, question and frisk,” or “stop-and-frisk” — randomly checking citizens for drugs or guns — was used heavily by New York City police starting in the 1990s to deter or stop crime from happening. A combination of court rulings and the end of the tenure of Mayor Mike Bloomberg saw the number of stops plummet from nearly 700,000 in 2011 to about 10,000 in 2017. Bloomberg is now being criticized by some for supporting the practice, which many feel was racially biased. But two professors in public policy, Charles F. Manski of Northwestern University and Daniel S. Nagin of Carnegie Mellon University, argue here that the tactic may have been the right answer for crime in the 1990s, but less so in an era of greatly reduced crime.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/crime...ht-time-place/




and all the studies found it was the increase in officers and not the evil SnF part


read your won shit dude
Click to expand...

I read it

Youre a lying bitch
 
Nomad said:
I read it

Youre a lying bitch
Click to expand...

IT WONT LET ME READ IT


you are being an idiot


it names two guys from the little it will allow me to see without signing up


post the part of it that proves what you claim or get another source ass crack
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top