Bernie wins New Hampshire!

It doesn't fucking matter. They called Obama a socialist too. They're going to call anyone we nominate that.

My point is [B]who gives a shit about what those fuckers are going to call us?[/B]

I don't fucking care, and I think it's weird that you do.




Well, they did the same thing to Obama and he won.

Why do you care so much what a bunch of stupid fascist assholes calls us?

Who cares?

hey're not the people we are trying to reach, so why are we concerned with what they call us?

Why are you so consumed with it?

STANDING OVATION!!!!!!!!!
 
YUP right wing for sure.....only a right wing idiot would think she's kicing his ass.......LMAPOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

His????

LV426 is a HE????

I would have sworn that hysterical screeching twat was a she.

Whatever "he" and "she" even mean among progressives nowadays... :dunno:
 
Do you think that fucking matters? They still call him a Socialist, and he's not even President anymore.

Why do you care so much about what Conservatives think and say? Do you think they are more influential than you? Do you think they are of higher status? Do you think they are smarter? OF COURSE NOT! So why do you care what they say? Why don't you just ignore it?




Embrace Democratic Socialism, as he did on stage last night by invoking all the socialism we already have and are already comfortable with, including socialism for people like Bloomberg.




No, I want it to be rebuilt into a party that represents working people instead of billionaires, special interests, and lobbyists.

And I think it's disappointing you don't feel the same.

You're in denial.

The Democratic Party is fragile simply because of its pivot to moderation and special interests.

compromising and catering to the racist right......it's the dems problem.
 
see you both don't want the Democratic party to come together
pretty stupid

Why can't it come together around Bernie?

Why must we come together around a candidate that got fewer votes, has a smaller donor base, and doesn't have the same level of enthusiasm or excitement among their supporters?

The Democratic Party does need to come together, but not around plutocrats or technocrats; it needs to come together around working class and poor people who vastly outnumber the wealthy.
 
How so? What do you mean?




It's naive to think they wouldn't have then turned and harmed Bernie if he was the nominee instead of her.




How? He campaigned 37 times for her after her nomination.

She only campaigned 8 times for Obama after he beat her in 2008.


Stop.




That's a stretch.

I don't blame Clinton for losing in 2016; I blame the people who voted for Trump. I also blame the 95 million people who didn't vote.

Personally, I think it would be much easier to get one of the 95 million people who didn't vote in 2016, to vote for Sanders than it is to convince one of the 62 million who voted for Trump to vote for a "moderate".

ouch............
 
LOL!

Look man, you asked for it, and I gave it to you.

Instead of reconciling it, you search for any excuse to dismiss it.

I have news for you; Sanders' support is only growing; it's not diminishing.

The time is going to come when it is clear that he has a path to the nomination, and when that time comes, I expect you to fall in line just like we had to fall in line behind Clinton in 2016.

They are going to ban you soon if you keep speaking the truth.........

It's about time someone does. .........
 
Why can't it come together around Bernie?

Why must we come together around a candidate that got fewer votes, has a smaller donor base, and doesn't have the same level of enthusiasm or excitement among their supporters?

The Democratic Party does need to come together, but not around plutocrats or technocrats; it needs to come together around working class and poor people who vastly outnumber the wealthy.

BECAUSE BERNIE IS A RUSSIAN ASSET!

the most votes out of 6 people is not the MOST VOTES huh
 
They just don't want to admit that the conventional wisdom that they've used to guide their political decision-making has been a giant miscalculation.

They just don't want to admit that the conventional wisdom that they've used to guide their political decision-making has been a giant INTENTIONAL LIE.

There fixed it.
 
They are going to ban you soon if you keep speaking the truth.........

It's about time someone does. .........

They're such spoiled brats; they got their way throughout Obama's term and have nothing to show for it other than losing 900 elected seats over 8 years.

It took progressives like AOC, Tlaib, Omar, and Khanna to regain control of the House after moderates lost it in 2010 and couldn't win it back.

It's obvious who the future of the Democratic Party is, and it's not a future where white complacent moderates enjoy outsized influence relative to their shit performance at the polls.
 
LOL!

Look man, you asked for it, and I gave it to you.

Instead of reconciling it, you search for any excuse to dismiss it.

I have news for you; Sanders' support is only growing; it's not diminishing.

The time is going to come when it is clear that he has a path to the nomination, and when that time comes, I expect you to fall in line just like we had to fall in line behind Clinton in 2016.

see


you call voting for some one other than BERNIE "falling in line"


you don't believe in Democracy

you believe is Burnocracy only


Bernie is NOT winning he is benifiting from more people running


you supporters of his HATE my party and its members
 
BECAUSE BERNIE IS A RUSSIAN ASSET!

No, he's not.

If he is, then what is the kompromat they have on him? Care to venture a guess? We know Trump is a Russian asset because of the paper trail connecting him directly to Trump Tower Moscow and the letter of intent he signed. So what is that kompromat Putin has on Bernie?


the most votes out of 6 people is not the MOST VOTES huh

Yes it is. And I showed you yesterday how Bernie beats every single other candidate in head-to-head. You were so arrogantly insistent that I provide you with that poll, and after doing so four times, you didn't even read it, and sought to dismiss it as irrelevant.

If you hate the electoral college, then you cannot support brokering nominations in backrooms during the convention.

You just can't unless you don't care that you look like a flaming hypocrite.
 
They're such spoiled brats; they got their way throughout Obama's term and have nothing to show for it other than losing 900 elected seats over 8 years.

It took progressives like AOC, Tlaib, Omar, and Khanna to regain control of the House after moderates lost it in 2010 and couldn't win it back.

It's obvious who the future of the Democratic Party is, and it's not a future where white complacent moderates enjoy outsized influence relative to their shit performance at the polls.

:hand::hand::hand:
 
you call voting for some one other than BERNIE "falling in line"

Exactly. Vote blue no matter who, right? Well, we voted for your candidate in 2016, even when we told you that she had less of a chance to win than Bernie, but you persisted, she persisted, and what was the result? A narrow electoral college loss. An electoral college you have personally said you wanted to get rid of yourself on these boards.

Now fast forward just 4 years and here you are, arguing for a version of the electoral college to broker a nominee at the convention other than the one who got the most votes.

So how does that not make you look like a fucking hypocrite? (<- not a rhetorical question)
 
you fools spew HATE at me and my party

You hate us for not bowing to Bernie as some fucking god


YOU spew hate on Warren because she is NOT BERNIE


she got more done in congress in a few years than Bernie did in decades


You spit on her and me Because we love the Democratic PARTY


AND THEN YOU EXPECT US TO BE YOUR BUDDIES ?


Bernie took Russian help last time and then LIED about it and TRASHED Hilary as if it was her fault he got taken by the Russians


your guy is a fucking liar
 
you don't believe in Democracy
you believe is Burnocracy only

You're the one saying that the candidate with the most votes shouldn't be the nominee and you accuse me of not believing in Democracy?

FFS. Is this just performance art right now? Is this a joke? Are you one of Colbert's writers and you're just testing bits of shameless hypocrisy on low-view message boards?
 
Exactly. Vote blue no matter who, right? Well, we voted for your candidate in 2016, even when we told you that she had less of a chance to win than Bernie, but you persisted, she persisted, and what was the result? A narrow electoral college loss. An electoral college you have personally said you wanted to get rid of yourself on these boards.

Now fast forward just 4 years and here you are, arguing for a version of the electoral college to broker a nominee at the convention other than the one who got the most votes.

So how does that not make you look like a fucking hypocrite? (<- not a rhetorical question)

NO BERNIE PEOPLE DIDNT ASSHOLE


THEY DIDNT VOTE
 
Back
Top