Assange was offered US pardon if he cleared Russia

Cinnabar

Verified User
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange plans to claim during an extradition hearing that the Trump administration offered him a pardon if he agreed to say Russia was not involved in leaking Democratic National Committee emails during the 2016 U.S. election campaign, a lawyer for Assange said Wednesday.

At a preliminary hearing held Wednesday in London, lawyer Edward Fitzgerald said that now-former Republican congressman, Dana Rohrabacher, visited Assange at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London in August 2017.

Fitzgerald said a statement from another Assange lawyer, Jennifer Robinson, recounted "Mr. Rohrabacher going to see Mr. Assange and saying, on instructions from the president, he was offering a pardon or some other way out, if Mr. Assange ... said Russia had nothing to do with the DNC leaks.”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/worl...he-cleared-russia/ar-BB10aj3d?ocid=spartandhp

Filthy corrupt criminal sock-cuckers!
 
Responding to the the lawyer's claims, White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham said, "This is absolutely and completely false."

U.S. President Donald Trump “barely knows Dana Rohrabacher other than he’s an ex-congressman. He’s never spoken to him on this subject or almost any subject," Grisham said. "It is a complete fabrication and a total lie. This is probably another never-ending hoax and total lie from the DNC.”

however Assange DID SAY it wasn't "state actors" = da Russians :rolleyes:
 
Filthy corrupt criminal sock-cuckers!

MORE LIES FROM THE FAKE NEWS, AND RUSSIANISTAS....PATHETIC...THEY JUSRT CANNOT GET THEIR MINDS AROUND IT!




2wwgis.jpg
 
Sounds like our guy.

Always some kind of angle.

Just like a mobster.

They got Capone on taxes.

I wonder why Potus won't show his?

Why did he lie?
 
Sounds like our guy.

Always some kind of angle.

Just like a mobster.

They got Capone on taxes.

I wonder why Potus won't show his?

Why did he lie?

The only ones who are supporting this POS other than trolls, birthers, tools and nitwits are fellow sociopathic criminals. We likely have some on here posting from prison.
 
I was skeptical when I read this story in the Seattle Times, but now we know for sure it's true. Check out the bolded part especially. The louder the screeching denial, the closer to the truth it is. Time for Impeachment v2.

""At a preliminary hearing held Wednesday in London, lawyer Edward Fitzgerald said that now-former Republican congressman, Dana Rohrabacher, visited Assange at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London in August 2017.

"Fitzgerald said a statement from another Assange lawyer, Jennifer Robinson, recounted “Mr. Rohrabacher going to see Mr. Assange and saying, on instructions from the president, he was offering a pardon or some other way out, if Mr. Assange … said Russia had nothing to do with the DNC leaks.”

"Responding to the the lawyer’s claims, White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham said, “This is absolutely and completely false.”

"U.S. President Donald Trump “barely knows Dana Rohrabacher other than he’s an ex-congressman. He’s never spoken to him on this subject or almost any subject,” Grisham said. “It is a complete fabrication and a total lie. This is probably another never-ending hoax and total lie from the DNC.”"


https://www.seattletimes.com/nation...e-was-offered-us-pardon-if-he-cleared-russia/
 
however Assange DID SAY it wasn't "state actors" = da Russians :rolleyes:

How many times have we heard this one, "President Donald Trump barely knows .....," or, "he's never spoken to him," and then a mountain of evidence surfaces proving the contrary
 
How many times have we heard this one, "President Donald Trump barely knows .....," or, "he's never spoken to him," and then a mountain of evidence surfaces proving the contrary

Assange claims it was a leak and not a hack.

Aren’t you interested if he has evidence to back his claim? Why didn’t Mullet interview him?
 
Hello ThatOwlWoman,

I was skeptical when I read this story in the Seattle Times, but now we know for sure it's true. Check out the bolded part especially. The louder the screeching denial, the closer to the truth it is. Time for Impeachment v2.

""At a preliminary hearing held Wednesday in London, lawyer Edward Fitzgerald said that now-former Republican congressman, Dana Rohrabacher, visited Assange at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London in August 2017.

"Fitzgerald said a statement from another Assange lawyer, Jennifer Robinson, recounted “Mr. Rohrabacher going to see Mr. Assange and saying, on instructions from the president, he was offering a pardon or some other way out, if Mr. Assange … said Russia had nothing to do with the DNC leaks.”

"Responding to the the lawyer’s claims, White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham said, “This is absolutely and completely false.”

"U.S. President Donald Trump “barely knows Dana Rohrabacher other than he’s an ex-congressman. He’s never spoken to him on this subject or almost any subject,” Grisham said. “It is a complete fabrication and a total lie. This is probably another never-ending hoax and total lie from the DNC.”"


https://www.seattletimes.com/nation...e-was-offered-us-pardon-if-he-cleared-russia/

Seems like every time he 'hardly knew' or 'barely knows' somebody, it's a coverup. More respectful Potus' have not had this problem where they keep having to deny they know somebody or had anything to do with somebody, etc. This Potus is not a victim. He creates it. He has this black cloud of suspicion that follows him everywhere he goes. Why is he always suspected of something immoral and then has to claim: "Oh, not him, he didn't do it." Quacks like a duck, guess what it is.
 
Trump didn't ask Asange to lie and say that it wasn't the Russians.....he asked him to tell the truth and say it wasn't the Russians.........demmycunts don't understand the difference.........
 
Hello archives,

Wait a minute, your rebutal is something the White House said, for real?

Trump and his White House does not have a record of ever telling the truth on anything and now you are seriously using them as a source? Might as well quote your barber

That would undoubtedly be a more reliable source of information.
 
Time for Impeachment v2.
:palm:
Dana Rohrabacher, visited Assange at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London in August 2017.

"Fitzgerald said a statement from another Assange lawyer, Jennifer Robinson, recounted “Mr. Rohrabacher going to see Mr. Assange and saying, on instructions from the president, he was offering a pardon or some other way out, if Mr. Assange … said Russia had nothing to do with the DNC leaks.”
so why wouldn't Assange SAY THAT? he already CLAIMED it wasn't "da Russians ( state actors)
and he was living in a cramped Embassy facing extradition.

he would have had every reason to go along with the "request" -but he chose not to?
That's100% illogical
 
well that was quick. Were back to russia already.

Makes sense since the economy is so good that obama wants to take credit for it.
 
Back
Top