What do we tell the children?

I don’t care how many marriages they have had, how many prostitutes they have slept with, how many kids out of wedlock...

Until they attack someone else’s marriage

Rush Limbaugh! TRUMPPERS!!!
 
CFM said:
No, proof of hypocrisy by those that lie about Trump but give Bill a pass.

Still waiting on the conviction date of Trump for rape. Do you have it or are you going to continue to troll and make up lies?
Click to expand...

Just because he wasn't convicted, doesn't mean he didn't do it. He's been accused of sexual assault by around 200 women, so it's more than likely that he assaulted at least one of them.
Clinton wasn't convicted. Do you still think he's a rapist?
 
CFM said:
That's why the "two consenting adults wanting to get married" defense is invalid. There are many that argued same sex couples should be able to get married because both were adults, they loved each other and both consented. Pose the option of two adults that love each other with both consenting that happen to be related and those using the two consenting adults argument run the other way in defending it. Also, pose the same argument when it happen to be a polygamous lifestyle and the same happens.

What that means is the two consenting adults argument for homos is nothing but one of special treatment.

For the record, I don't support incestuous marriages or polygamy but those using the consenting adults argument should if that is their true stance. According to the scenario in your post, if both are consenting, why would the same sex marriage supporters oppose it?
Click to expand...

Because of poly-phobia lol?

You’re right: once the door was opened to give gays *more rights* than polygamists—any argument against polygamy went out the window.

And it’s just a matter of time before it comes up. Surprised it hasn’t already.
 
Jarod said:
Remember when they used to claim they cared about the sanctity of marriage.
Click to expand...

Sanctity of the *institution*.

Not whether given individuals respect marriage. The institution was formerly one man one woman. But we crossed the Rubicon for gays and yeah.
 
CFM said:
That's why the "two consenting adults wanting to get married" defense is invalid. There are many that argued same sex couples should be able to get married because both were adults, they loved each other and both consented. Pose the option of two adults that love each other with both consenting that happen to be related and those using the two consenting adults argument run the other way in defending it. Also, pose the same argument when it happen to be a polygamous lifestyle and the same happens.
Click to expand...

Failed logic. Do two consenting same-sex adults result in offsprings? No? Then your comparison is retarded.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top