“John Bolton put me through hell,”

[archives]

I think everyone is getting out ahead on Bolton, obvious he is selling books, and if he is called as a witnesses, just like Mueller, he will deliver a nebulous type testimomy that will leave both sides enough to peddle their cases. He may have a grudge against Trump, but he is a staunch conservative

 

[archives]

read it again. Bolton was rogue, the harassment was part of his modus operandi. hes a warmongering prick

As it was Trump's, you can't call a fat sixty year old man who talks about grabbing young women's pussies as anything but a dirty old man, which makes it kinda hypocritical to personally attack another for the same behavior

 

[anatta]

I have no idea what point you are making.

Let me make this crystal clear to you: it is obvious now that you never were a former Barack Obama supporter like you attempted to claim.

You insulted my intelligence trying to posture as one, and I have zero tolerance for using my time to accommodate and engage deceivers and willful message board liars.

You may continue reading my posts and composing responses to me, but there is small probability I will ever read them.

for that matter I supported Obama in '08 - i supported Hillary as well.
-all before Libya

 

[Jarod]

it was a bad appointment..happens..doesn't excuse Bolton from his book

Ha, Trump only hires the best....

 

[Stretch]

Trump Picked Bolten

And, now YOU want him. LOL

 

[anatta]

As it was Trump's, you can't call a fat sixty year old man who talks about grabbing young women's pussies as anything but a dirty old man, which makes it kinda hypocritical to personally attack another for the same behavior

nothing I haven't heard before when a couple guys get raunchy. doesn't mean it's acceptable,but it's far from any sexual harassment act

 

[archives]

it was a bad appointment..happens..doesn't excuse Bolton from his book

Based upon the comings and goings, seems Trump made a lot of those bad appointments

And you better brace yourself, as soon as Trump leaves the White House, you are going to see a siege of tell all books from prior Trump appointees, Bolton was not the only one who was taken back on what he saw in the Trump Admistrarion

 

[CFM]

Yes! Taylor as well, excellent witnesses.

You find anything claimed that is anti Trump as excellent regardless of how untruthful it is.

Anyone that thought a black BOY was qualified to be President because of skin color is liable to believe anything.

 

[archives]

nothing I haven't heard before when a couple guys get raunchy. doesn't mean it's acceptable,but it's far from any sexual harassment act

You heard a lot of married sixty year olds proudly narrating how they trying to nail married women? Love to grab young women pussies? It is not the level of harassment that matters, rather the fact that it is present

 

[anatta]

You heard a lot of married sixty year olds proudly narrating how they trying to nail married women? Love to grab young women pussies? It is not the level of harassment that matters, rather the fact that it is present

no. it's the LEVEL OF HARASSMENT THAT MATTERS - the damage done

yes it's shocking but i've heard men talk about fooling around outside marriage

 

[anatta]

Based upon the comings and goings, seems Trump made a lot of those bad appointments

And you better brace yourself, as soon as Trump leaves the White House, you are going to see a siege of tell all books from prior Trump appointees, Bolton was not the only one who was taken back on what he saw in the Trump Admistrarion

after he leaves WH isn't a problem, undercutting a sitting POTUS is

 

[Saudade]

Only to Trump and his mindless, brainwashed sycophants.

His reputation says otherwise.

He has a mixed reputation. He advocated for the invasion of Iraq, but he also advocated for the end of the Iran nuclear deal.

If you're saying that he's a very honest man, then that is an interesting assessment to come from the left, seeing as how the left has said that the Iraq War and the opposition to the Iran nuclear deal were built on lies.

Personally, I think he was right on the Iran deal and wrong on the Iraq War.

 

[Saudade]

So as far as you're concerned, anyone who worked for him but refused to be complicit in his criminal activity or to remain silent about it, were a mistake?

I guess having such gutter level or non-existent standards makes life a lot easier than having them as high as normal people's.



.

No, the reason Sessions was a mistake is because his policy stances were very big government. He was supportive of civil asset forfeiture, for example.

The reason Bolton was a mistake is because he's a war hawk. In short, Trump shouldn't be appointing neocons or statists.

 

[Freddy Figbottom]

What horrible people trump has surrounded himself with. It is sad that the only way the Alt Right has left to defend trump is to agree with everyone else that his entire cabinet is made up of pathetic criminals.

its sad that all dem hopes rest on john bolton, psychotic warhawk.

 

[Irish]

Shut the fuck up you mentally challenged hypocrite.

Last year you were Volton's biggest cheerleader. What a disgusting drizzling shit stain you are.

Who's Volton?

 

[Saudade]

You Sir are an outright liar.
Even Dems think Bolton is honest.

They didn't think that when Bolton was working for Bush. They also didn't think that when he was supporting ending the Iran nuclear deal.

The liars involved here are the liberals that try to build up the reputation of anyone that opposes Trump. They did the same thing with McCain. After hating McCain when he ran against Obama, they suddenly thought he was a war hero when he voiced some opposition to Trump.

 

[Saudade]

I have no idea what point you are making.

Let me make this crystal clear to you: it is obvious now that you never were a former Barack Obama supporter like you attempted to claim.

You insulted my intelligence trying to posture as one, and I have zero tolerance for using my time to accommodate and engage deceivers and willful message board liars.

You may continue reading my posts and composing responses to me, but there is small probability I will ever read them.

So you think it's impossible for someone to vote for Obama but despise Hillary?

That kind of binary thinking is exactly why the Democrats have been ineffective at bringing in moderates oftentimes.

Believe what you want, but here's how I voted for president over the last several elections: 2004 - Kerry, 2008 - Obama, 2012 - no one (I lost faith in Obama and saw Romney as virtually the same as him), 2016 - Trump.

I'm definitely not the only person to move from Democrat to Republican over time. It was the Obama era in which Democrats devolved into the party of identity politics.

 

[Saudade]

for that matter I supported Obama in '08 - i supported Hillary as well.
-all before Libya

Cypress finds it impossible to believe that people evolve in their views, likely because he hasn't evolved in his.

 

[ziggy]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1222636252962467841

 

[Nomad]

He has a mixed reputation. He advocated for the invasion of Iraq, but he also advocated for the end of the Iran nuclear deal.

If you're saying that he's a very honest man, then that is an interesting assessment to come from the left, seeing as how the left has said that the Iraq War and the opposition to the Iran nuclear deal were built on lies.

Personally, I think he was right on the Iran deal and wrong on the Iraq War.

The lies the Iraq invasion were based on weren't his lies.

They came out of the mouths of Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld.

I never said I agreed with his foreign policy ideas.

But he has a reputation for being a straight shooter.

If he says Trump knowingly did what he's accused of, most people, myself included, will believe him.

Trump is crapping in his expensive monogrammed shorts right now.