Still ATTACKING 16yr old KIDS on JPP! Talk about, "scared of girls"

FastLane said:
We should only critique 16 year olds that continue to inject their opinion into politics. If they want to play in an adult arena then they are fair game.
Click to expand...

That's fair -- so please stick with attacking her ideas. You might have noticed that very little of that happens on these GretaScareMeSoHard threads. Nope, they go after her parents, her autism, what she eats, what means of transportation she uses, her speech, her demeanor, etc.
 
Havana Moon said:
Ok that's another 12b ffs, when is this cunt going to disappear?
Click to expand...

Havana Moon has a very strange interpretation of the rules. He seems to think that Alt Right posters have an a right to make sexually explicit verbal attacks on a child without anyone being allowed to call them out on it.

So if I say trump probably has a small penis to go with his small hands, Havana Moon can scream that I should not say that about the president. But when Alt Right posters say makes sexualized attacks on a 16 year old child, Havana Moon says no one is allowed to defend her, because she is a child.

It is a double standard in the opposite way then we should have the double standard. I can understand MORE protections for children, but not LESS protections for children.
 
Walt said:
Havana Moon has a very strange interpretation of the rules. He seems to think that Alt Right posters have an a right to make sexually explicit verbal attacks on a child without anyone being allowed to call them out on it.

So if I say trump probably has a small penis to go with his small hands, Havana Moon can scream that I should not say that about the president. But when Alt Right posters say makes sexualized attacks on a 16 year old child, Havana Moon says no one is allowed to defend her, because she is a child.

It is a double standard in the opposite way then we should have the double standard. I can understand MORE protections for children, but not LESS protections for children.
Click to expand...
Walter, you don’t even know that there is no school on Saturday.

Why should we have confidence in anything you post?
 
Walt said:
Havana Moon has a very strange interpretation of the rules. He seems to think that Alt Right posters have an a right to make sexually explicit verbal attacks on a child without anyone being allowed to call them out on it.

So if I say trump probably has a small penis to go with his small hands, Havana Moon can scream that I should not say that about the president. But when Alt Right posters say makes sexualized attacks on a 16 year old child, Havana Moon says no one is allowed to defend her, because she is a child.

It is a double standard in the opposite way then we should have the double standard. I can understand MORE protections for children, but not LESS protections for children.
Click to expand...

Rule 12b refers specifically to posters calling, implicitly or explicitly, other posters paedophiles. I suggest you read the rules and stop talking out of your arse.
 
Last edited:
Centerleftfl said:
Seriously? Is the paradigm, SHE's a CHILD, a girl, a girl who even has a disability? Toooo easy. Low hanging fruit? How DARE the little bitch speak.

Grown men, on ANOTHER continent feel the right to call her any names they want to.

Too bad she did she wasn't HOT and had really big tits, they might at least listen first.
Click to expand...

Kind of like when Leftists attacked the AOC impersonator girl? Sent her and her family death threats, for daring to mock the great AOCkkkkhhhh
 
Havana Moon said:
Rule 12b refers specifically to posters calling, implicitly or explicitly, other posters paedophiles. I suggest you read the rules and stop talking out of your arse.
Click to expand...

I am just saying that allowing sexual comments about children, but banning the complaining about sexual comments about children is just plain odd.
 
Walt said:
I am just saying that allowing sexual comments about children, but banning the complaining about sexual comments about children is just plain odd.
Click to expand...

They are the rules, whether you like it or not. I might also point out that Katzshit has just been banned, so I would nail my colours to another mast if I were you!
 
Centerleftfl said:
Seriously? Is the paradigm, SHE's a CHILD, a girl, a girl who even has a disability? Toooo easy. Low hanging fruit? How DARE the little bitch speak.

Grown men, on ANOTHER continent feel the right to call her any names they want to.

Too bad she did she wasn't HOT and had really big tits, they might at least listen first.
Click to expand...

She is a child used by the left.....and this is not the first time that the left has used Retarded kids to push an agenda. They pushed out crippled kids in wheels chairs when Stem Cell research was the goal.to use human children as lab rats.....and should we forget the kid form Cuba....how about the 90s when they used another child much like the retarded Greta Thunberg....to push a left wing agenda. The left often use children to scare other children and many adults with the mentality of a child....as evidenced in this thread. :bigthink:
 
Havana Moon said:
A seventeen year old is not a child.
Click to expand...

Isn't it amazing how quickly that goes back and forth. When you need her to be a child to get someone banned, she is a child. When you need her to not be a child not to get banned yourself, she is an adult.
 
Walt said:
Isn't it amazing how quickly that goes back and forth. When you need her to be a child to get someone banned, she is a child. When you need her to not be a child not to get banned yourself, she is an adult.
Click to expand...

Write a book about it, I suggest that your nom de plume could be Walt Shitman.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top