White Libs send Cory Booker packing - off to the fields to pick cotton

I’m White you moron. I’m not sorry you weren’t promoted because a very qualified black man got your job.

I'm sorry you're stupid enough to think a black is qualified because he/she is black.

BTW, what you say didn't happen. It may make you feel better thinking it did but I've yet to see one that is what you say.
 
I'm sorry you're stupid enough to think a black is qualified because he/she is black.

BTW, what you say didn't happen. It may make you feel better thinking it did but I've yet to see one that is what you say.
You’re a liar and a racist
 
I’m White you moron. I’m not sorry you weren’t promoted because a very qualified black man got your job.

You have to wonder why he's here since even a bunch of the conservatives tear his nonsense apart. I think he's here just to act tough with his bigotry and challenge people like a wannabe big shot. Otherwise, he'd be on Stormfront or something like that. As if anyone would take up a meet and settle things challenge from an off-radar keyboard jockey that probably lives several hundreds of miles away.
 
then shut the fuck up and accept that most black humans are better than you at everything

I guess that's why they need special consideration based on race and I qualify based on skills. Strange how you think skin color is a qualification and having skills is not.

If they were, you wouldn't be screaming about blacks needing special treatment to get things like voter IDs, something white people have no problem getting.
 
You want to give the Black man the almost powerless VP slot because he is Black. :palm:

If Democrats have not nominated a black to be President, then BigBitch has a point. If they have(Obama), then we have to wonder if BigBitch is lying about everything else.
 
Why do you White libs NOT support Booker for prez?

Many white liberals do support Booker for President. Others support someone else more. I cannot imagine almost any white liberals voting against Booker if he gets the nomination.

The Alt Right claimed that the only reason people voted for Obama was he was black. There are millions of other blacks, so there really must be more to selecting Obama than he was black. Now they say if we do not elect Booker, we are racists. We are not required to vote for Booker just because he is black.

Booker would probably make an excellent President. He would definitely be far better than trump. But Booker is still young, and does not have as much experience as I would like to see.
 
If Democrats have not nominated a black to be President, then BigBitch has a point. If they have(Obama), then we have to wonder if BigBitch is lying about everything else.

There was nothing great or special about Obama. :dunno:
 
Many white liberals do support Booker for President. Others support someone else more. I cannot imagine almost any white liberals voting against Booker if he gets the nomination.

The Alt Right claimed that the only reason people voted for Obama was he was black. There are millions of other blacks, so there really must be more to selecting Obama than he was black. Now they say if we do not elect Booker, we are racists. We are not required to vote for Booker just because he is black.

Booker would probably make an excellent President. He would definitely be far better than trump. But Booker is still young, and does not have as much experience as I would like to see.

That's what makes this OP so ridiculous. When white Liberals supported Obama, they were SJW cucks who were only supporting Obama because he's black. Now white Liberals are supporting Sanders, so they're racists who won't support a black candidate. This just shows that white Liberals are judging the individual, not the race.
 
That's what makes this OP so ridiculous. When white Liberals supported Obama, they were SJW cucks who were only supporting Obama because he's black. Now white Liberals are supporting Sanders, so they're racists who won't support a black candidate. This just shows that white Liberals are judging the individual, not the race.

What is the difference between Booker and Sanders, politically. :dunno:
 
Booker wants medicare for who wants it, while Sanders wants medicare for all.


https://www.cnn.com/www.cnn.com › 2019/05/05 › politics › cory-booker-medicare-for-all
Booker doubles down on support of both 'Medicare for All' and ...
May 5, 2019 - Cory Booker doubled down on his decision to support a "Medicare for All" bill that would effectively eliminate private insurance plans while also ...
 
You cut the quote short because it goes on to say he's supporting both medicare for all and private insurance. This is "medicare for who wants it" and is different from what Sanders wants, which is to put everyone on medicare.

https://www.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com › 2019/03/23 › health › private-health-insurance-me...
Medicare for All Would Abolish Private Insurance. 'There's No ...
Mar 23, 2019 - The private health insurance business employs at least a half a million ... Mr. Sanders, independent of Vermont, ran on the idea in his 2016 ..."

:dunno:
 
Poor Cory. :palm:

Fox News
Cory Booker suspends 2020 presidential campaign
New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker on Monday suspended his campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination after struggling since the start to break into the ...
1 hour ago

Damn are you a bigot and proud of it. He did not make the donation and polling requirements. If he made them, he would still be there.
 
Damn are you a bigot and proud of it. He did not make the donation and polling requirements. If he made them, he would still be there.

Democrats scream that diversity is their party's number one plank. Yet, like the white Hollywood Oscars, they have no Black nominees. :dunno:
 
Apology accepted.

Oh pleez, the only difference between the two candidates is one is a young Black male ... and the other is an angry old white man.

Heck, Biden doesn't even want "Medicare for all", like Booker does. :dunno:
 
Back
Top