At Least 1 Dead in Shooting at Texas Church

SmarterthanYou said:
i find it very laughable that you, someone who is ridiculously fanatic about something NOT being in the constitution, then it doesn't matter, would try to use something madison wrote, but then later discarded, as the true intent of the 2nd Amendment. what does that mean to YOU, moron?
Click to expand...

:lolup:

I see you failed, once again, to grasp the concept.

:rofl2:
 
The shooter was advancing toward the front of the Church and fired off a shot toward the people in front/person on stage just as he was hit in the head by the good guy’s bullet. thanks to the quick action and skill of the good guy with gun MANY MANY lives saved

He shot the perp with in 10 seconds, cops would have been at least 5 mins away

This would have been a blood bath if not for good guy with gun
 
The perp with the black coat, black hood - reeks of Antifa “odd” that the name hasn’t been released yet. Scrubbing his socialist networking profile first
 
looked like about 6 good guys with guns pulled guns

i thought the left said many people would be killed in the cross fire of Rambo's with guns

didn't happen did it u stupid fucks
 
archives said:
Tough, of course, what is worth doing that isn't tough, and 30,000+ dead Americans every year make it worth doing

No one has to change the Constitution, no Constitutional right is absolute, even Scalia in his wacky "orginailaism" theory conceded regulation was Constitutional

You don't have to eliminate all existing guns, an impossible task, but rather make access to guns more difficult, when a high school kid or a person on a terror watch list legally has access to assault weapons something isn't right

And having to work to keep guns out isn't a justification for not addressing the problem, should we give up drug enforcement cause it is too much of a task?
Click to expand...

So, your solution is to try the same logic as the failed War on Drugs.
 
archives said:
I don't know, in a similar attack yesterday based upon religion in New York, a State with strong gun regulations, a knife had to be employed, now if that was Texas the pert could have mowed down the entire gathering in minutes
Click to expand...

Unless the gathering was armed....
 
archives said:
Tough, of course, what is worth doing that isn't tough, and 30,000+ dead Americans every year make it worth doing

No one has to change the Constitution, no Constitutional right is absolute, even Scalia in his wacky "orginailaism" theory conceded regulation was Constitutional

You don't have to eliminate all existing guns, an impossible task, but rather make access to guns more difficult, when a high school kid or a person on a terror watch list legally has access to assault weapons something isn't right

And having to work to keep guns out isn't a justification for not addressing the problem, should we give up drug enforcement cause it is too much of a task?
Click to expand...

Citation needed.
 
archives said:
Make it more difficult for anyone to get guns, as is often the case, it is a "good guy" with a gun who does the shooting, Stephen Paddock wasn't a criminal till the moment he opened fire
Click to expand...

Chicago has tried that route. It doesn't work so well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top