PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
I want to know why he said he didn't know who the whistleblower was when his staff set the whole thing up.........
Voters are demanding that McConnell hold a real trial, with witnesses
- Thread starter floridafan
- Start date
I want to know why he said he didn't know who the whistleblower was when his staff set the whole thing up.........
floridafan
Verified User
He didn't. His staff set nothing up, you are just parroting more fascist talking points.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
and now more people do NOT want Trump impeached and removed that those who do.....
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/public_approval_of_the_impeachment_and_removal_of_president_trump-6957.html
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
there is nothing in the constitution or any other law that says congress can issue subpoenas to "non-investigations"......
floridafan
Verified User
Thats a very high percentage, prior to a senate trial. Much much higher than in the Clinton impeachment.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
I'm not aware there's been a decision yet........you Nazi charlatan......
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
but you don't want anyone to ask him that under oath......I get it.......
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
really?.......you have a link to a poll taken before the Clinton trial about who should testify?........or are you just pulling feathers out of your ass.......
floridafan
Verified User
Stick your links up your fascist ass. If you want info- google.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
sorry if I angered you, you mindless cunt........nothing personal, you know.......its simply a matter of you lacking any credibility.......
Who cares, what's that have to do with Nancy not handing over the articles
Same rules as the house. No demonrat witnesses allowed. Fair is fair.
floridafan
Verified User
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Seriously you really do need to shut that massive great trap of yours, your ignorance is truly astonishing.
https://www.manhattancontrarian.com/blog/2019-12-20-whither-impeachment
Because the logical answer to all the questions is this is a politically motivated attack on our president by the demonrats to interfere with the 2020 election that they have admitted they cannot win without impeachment.
He released the transcript of what he said. It didnt jive with the statement put out by the second hand whistleblowers second hand account. Witnesses said what trump said BUT they added what they THOUGHT he meant when he said it. That's OPINION not fact.
You had your trial and even with no republican witnesses being allowed it proved only that trump has rat bastard two face turncoat pieces of shat working for him. Transcript says it all. They add their own bias anti trump slant to it and jump in bed with the traitors working to sway the 2020 election. All should be hung for treason.
Typical liberal garbage. Work for a man. Smile to his face and pretent to support his agenda. Then knife him in his back because you dont agree with his agenda like it was you that got elected.
Such an impressive rebuttal, which ended (as always) in your defeat. At the end you realized that you lost so you had to toss in the ad hominem. Bye, Felicia!
It ended with no rebuttal or response to my question. Typical libtard tactic. Ignore the question that proves this is purely political and instead attack with smart ass drivel.
Yes you win alright lol.
Republicans were denied witnesses. Other witnesses were stopped from answering questions. Trump would be stupid to show up in this bias setting.
Or in reality the prosecution proves its case. Quid pro quo was the charge and obstruction was the impeachment. Seems even they knew how stupid you are.