Jim Jordan rips Dems Star witness to shreds!

I understand that Wiki might be a viable citation in Alabama, but here in the real world, only an inbred fool would offer it for anything other than a very general source of information.

The Ukrainian people were going to tar and feather him, along with Yanukovych. They both fled Ukraine, having stolen some $40 billion
^^^^^^^
Lying sack of shit.

"Zlochevsky returned to Ukraine in February 2018 after investigations into his Burisma Holdings had been completed in December 2017 with no charges filed against him."

From the same wiki link ... which I use because, while it still leans left, it is the most neutral source I can find.
 
^^^^^^^
Lying sack of shit.

"Zlochevsky returned to Ukraine in February 2018 after investigations into his Burisma Holdings had been completed in December 2017 with no charges filed against him."

From the same wiki link ... which I use because it is the most neutral source I can find.

Good point. I have compared wiki to other non partisan sources. They usually match right up. Smart man.
 
Good point. I have compared wiki to other non partisan sources. They usually match right up. Smart man.

Yeah, and if he doesn't like that source, Sailor, there''s always the NYT 2015 article.




" Biden has faced scrutiny since December 2015, when the New York Times published a story https://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/09/w...iden-ties.html
noting that Burisma hired Hunter Biden just weeks after the vice president was asked by President Obama to oversee U.S.-Ukraine relations. That story also alerted Biden’s office that Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin had an active investigation of Burisma and its founder."
 
Yeah, and if he doesn't like that source, Sailor, there''s always the NYT 2015 article.




" Biden has faced scrutiny since December 2015, when the New York Times published a story https://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/09/w...iden-ties.html
noting that Burisma hired Hunter Biden just weeks after the vice president was asked by President Obama to oversee U.S.-Ukraine relations. That story also alerted Biden’s office that Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin had an active investigation of Burisma and its founder."

The NYT is like crack to liberals!!!!!!!!!!!
 
^^^^^^^
Lying sack of shit.

"Zlochevsky returned to Ukraine in February 2018 after investigations into his Burisma Holdings had been completed in December 2017 with no charges filed against him."

From the same wiki link ... which I use because, while it still leans left, it is the most neutral source I can find.
Investigations were closed before that, and are now reopened. He fled with other oligarchs when the regime was toppled, and he was in danger. Sure...there was supposed to be an investigation.

None ever took place in Ukraine.

Until Biden demanded one.
 
Investigations were closed before that, and are now reopened. He fled with other oligarchs when the regime was toppled, and he was in danger. Sure...there was supposed to be an investigation.

None ever took place in Ukraine.

Until Biden demanded one.

:lolup:

:rofl2:
 
Yeah, and if he doesn't like that source, Sailor, there''s always the NYT 2015 article.




" Biden has faced scrutiny since December 2015, when the New York Times published a story https://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/09/w...iden-ties.html
noting that Burisma hired Hunter Biden just weeks after the vice president was asked by President Obama to oversee U.S.-Ukraine relations. That story also alerted Biden’s office that Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin had an active investigation of Burisma and its founder."

Says nothing.
 
Says nothing.

Yes, well of course. All liberals see just a blank page.

Any facts that contradict liberal mythology are invisible to you and your kind. :dunno:

It is a condition often referred to as "liberal blinders".
 
Yes, well of course. All liberals see just a blank page.

Any facts that contradict liberal mythology are invisible to you and your kind. :dunno:

It is a condition often referred to as "liberal blinders".

Says nothing. You haven’t even looked at the article, have you?
 
Says nothing. You haven’t even looked at the article, have you?

Obciously, you haven't. :palm:

And then there is Politifact ...

" Biden’s Burisma directorship attracted attention because Burisma was owned by Mykola Zlochevsky, a minister under Russia-friendly President Viktor F. Yanukovych who subsequently went into exile after a popular revolution. After Yanukovych was ousted, Zlochevsky faced a variety of corruption-related investigations involving his business.

In 2015, Ukraine’s newly appointed prosecutor general Viktor Shokin inherited some of the investigations into Zlochevsky and his company. (Zlochevsky and the company have denied the allegations.) Shokin was ousted as prosecutor in 2016. "


https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-...-checking-joe-biden-hunter-biden-and-ukraine/
 
Obciously, you haven't. :palm:

And then there is Politifact ...

" Biden’s Burisma directorship attracted attention because Burisma was owned by Mykola Zlochevsky, a minister under Russia-friendly President Viktor F. Yanukovych who subsequently went into exile after a popular revolution. After Yanukovych was ousted, Zlochevsky faced a variety of corruption-related investigations involving his business.

In 2015, Ukraine’s newly appointed prosecutor general Viktor Shokin inherited some of the investigations into Zlochevsky and his company. (Zlochevsky and the company have denied the allegations.) Shokin was ousted as prosecutor in 2016. "


https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-...-checking-joe-biden-hunter-biden-and-ukraine/

Says nothing except exonerates both Bidens.

“The viral image said that when Hunter Biden was serving as "a director to Ukraine’s largest private gas producer," his father "threatened to withhold $1 BILLION in U.S. aid to Ukraine if they didn’t fire a prosecutor looking into" the gas company.

The image gets individual pieces of this assertion right -- Hunter Biden was a director of the company, and Joe Biden did leverage U.S. aid to fire a prosecutor. But it overreaches by assuming that Joe Biden acted to protect the company his son was affiliated with. In reality, there was widespread agreement in the West that the existing prosecutor had to go, and it’s not clear that the company would have benefited from his ouster anyway, given evidence that its cases had long been dormant.”
 
Last edited:
Obciously, you haven't. :palm:

And then there is Politifact ...

" Biden’s Burisma directorship attracted attention because Burisma was owned by Mykola Zlochevsky, a minister under Russia-friendly President Viktor F. Yanukovych who subsequently went into exile after a popular revolution. After Yanukovych was ousted, Zlochevsky faced a variety of corruption-related investigations involving his business.

In 2015, Ukraine’s newly appointed prosecutor general Viktor Shokin inherited some of the investigations into Zlochevsky and his company. (Zlochevsky and the company have denied the allegations.) Shokin was ousted as prosecutor in 2016. "


https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-...-checking-joe-biden-hunter-biden-and-ukraine/

Like they said in testimony today. There are many, many questionable companies in Ukraine. If they have done corrupt practices, it does not mean a lobbyist they brought in is immediately corrupt. Is everyone working at the California energy company responsible for the fires? You have to find a crime before you can accuse Hunter.
It seems corruption is how businesses worked in Ukraine.
 
Says nothing except exonerates both Bidens.

“The viral image said that when Hunter Biden was serving as "a director to Ukraine’s largest private gas producer," his father "threatened to withhold $1 BILLION in U.S. aid to Ukraine if they didn’t fire a prosecutor looking into" the gas company.

The image gets individual pieces of this assertion right -- Hunter Biden was a director of the company, and Joe Biden did leverage U.S. aid to fire a prosecutor. But it overreaches by assuming that Joe Biden acted to protect the company his son was affiliated with. In reality, there was widespread agreement in the West that the existing prosecutor had to go, and it’s not clear that the company would have benefited from his ouster anyway, given evidence that its cases had long been dormant.”

And that is the cover story :dunno: Which contradicts the ORIGINAL 2015 NYT story and Shokin's recent testimony.

And the timeline blows up Al the A's fake news narrative.
 
Like they said in testimony today. There are many, many questionable companies in Ukraine. If they have done corrupt practices, it does not mean a lobbyist they brought in is immediately corrupt. Is everyone working at the California energy company responsible for the fires? You have to find a crime before you can accuse Hunter.
It seems corruption is how businesses worked in Ukraine.

Nonsensical babbling liberal :palm:

It was obvious to everyone, even the NYT, that the appearances of the Biden/Burisma deal were unethical from the start.
 
And that is the cover story :dunno: Which contradicts the ORIGINAL 2015 NYT story and Shokin's recent testimony.

And the timeline blows up Al the A's fake news narrative.

You never read the original NYT story, bitch, so you have no idea what it says.

Your reference exonerates them, moron.

Fucking Appalachian idiot.
 
A couple more Gym Nasium Jordan gems. What a fucking clown. But then again, he did get laughed at, just like any clown wants.

“I’ve always said that if you’re not being impeached then you’re not really doing your job.”

“We’ve got six people having four conversations in one sentence, and you just told me this is where you got your ‘clear understanding’ that the president had linked security assistance to investigations.”

“There were some people on a train. Nineteen people get off the train at the first stop. Seventeen people get on the train. Now there are 63 people on the train. How many people were on the train to begin with?”

Fucking hilarious.

Then, he goes into this diatribe to apologize for the Ohio State shit.

:rofl2:

Wow. Some liberals laughed at the guy. Big whoop. You still have nothing lol.
 
Let's see.

Got laughed at by the entire audience by putting his foot in his mouth

Went on the rambling diatribe about the shit at Ohio State when he looked the other way on molestation.

Here' some more laughable bullshit:

“I’ve always said that if you’re not being impeached then you’re not really doing your job.”
“We’ve got six people having four conversations in one sentence, and you just told me this is where you got your ‘clear understanding’ that the president had linked security assistance to investigations.”
“There were some people on a train. Nineteen people get off the train at the first stop. Seventeen people get on the train. Now there are 63 people on the train. How many people were on the train to begin with?”

A clown. Yes. You AND Gym Jordan.

:rofl2:

Wow. Some liberals laughed. So you have zero zilch nada lol.
 
Back
Top