MAGA MAN
Let's go Brandon!
The pudding, cunt. Watch it and you’ll get the proof.
CHECKMATE.
LOL. Thanks for confirming again that you have nothing.
Looks like you're triggered as well, with the Schifty Circus not going as you expected...
The pudding, cunt. Watch it and you’ll get the proof.
CHECKMATE.
you wouldn't know a checkmate puzzle if you fell over it. more bullshit
Probably because he is.Jordan has come across as desperate and unhinged.
LOL. Thanks for confirming again that you have nothing.
Looks like you're triggered as well, with the Schifty Circus not going as you expected...
So how did Jordan do today!!!!!
Then why did Zlochevsky flee?
Zlochevsky expanded Burisma at the same time when he was Ukraine's environment minister, whose duties included issuing drilling licenses. After the bloody revolution on Kyiv's streets five years ago, Zlochevsky — like disgraced President Viktor Yanukovych — fled Ukraine.
Let me know if there's anything else I canZlochevsky expanded Burisma at the same time when he was Ukraine's environment minister, whose duties included issuing drilling licenses. After the bloody revolution on Kyiv's streets five years ago, Zlochevsky — like disgraced President Viktor Yanukovych — fled Ukraine.
Now you know why, you inbred foolI already know when he left, lying nazi socialist fucking pig
Now you know why, you inbred fool

LMAO. Sure he was.I already know why, dipshit motherfucker. He was being investigated.![]()
In fact, Burisma and its owner, Mykola Zlochevsky, did not get any exceptional treatment. The prosecutor Biden singled out in 2016, Viktor Shokin, failed to make any high-level corruption convictions — as did Yuriy Lutsenko, his successor. At the time, Ukrainian anti-corruption activists and other Western governments joined Biden in his criticism of Shokin, and Ukrainian prosecutors have said there is no indication that Hunter Biden did anything wrong.
On Friday,Ruslan Ryaboshapka, Ukraine's newly appointed chief prosecutor, told reporters his office will review all investigations shelved by his predecessors, including those involving Burisma and Zlochevsky. Those investigations were into activities that took place before Hunter Biden joined the board in 2014.
LMAO. Sure he was.
Jim Jordan was laughed at by the audience in one of his rants.
"Only Chairman Schif knows who the WB is." LIE
"They understand the facts support the President." LIE
Jordan claimed that in "not one" of the interactions between American and Ukranian officials was military aid linked to an investigation of Burisma, the company that paid Hunter Biden, the VP's son, to sit on it's board." LIE BY OMISSION. The aid was linked to Biden himself. The investigation of Burisma was complete and dormant.
CHECKMATE, cunt.
I understand that Wiki might be a viable citation in Alabama, but here in the real world, only an inbred fool would offer it for anything other than a very general source of information.Shokin was investigating the Ukrainian oligarch that owns Burisma and Joe Biden.
"At the end of 2014, Zlochevsky fled Ukraine amid allegations of unlawful self enrichment and legalization of funds"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mykola_Zlochevsky
You attacking the messenger isn't proof of anything, especially since Jordan isn't being impeached...
LOL, yup, you have nothing nada zero.

If this sham Democrat circus had anyone of integrity (they do not or are afraid), there would be a notice of termination, a summary judgement and there would be an apology forthcoming from these fanatics (which includes most of the radical, Socialist Democrat party) to President Trump who has now been cleared by the Ukrainian Foreign Minister, Vadym Pyrstaiko.
Don’t hold your breath.
Summary Judgement:
“A court order ruling that no factual issues remain to be tried and therefore a cause of action or all causes of action in a complaint can be decided upon certain facts without trial. A summary judgment is based upon a motion by one of the parties that contends that all necessary factual issues are settled or so one-sided they need not be tried. The motion is supported by declarations under oath, excerpts from depositions which are under oath, admissions of fact and other discovery, as well as a legal argument (points and authorities), that argue that there are no triable issues of fact and that the settled facts require a summary judgment for the moving party. The opposing party will respond by counter-declarations and legal arguments attempting to show that there are "triable issues of fact." If it is unclear whether there is a triable issue of fact in any cause of action, then summary judgment must be denied as to that cause of action. The theory behind the summary judgment process is to eliminate the need to try settled factual issues and to decide without trial one or more causes of action in the complaint. The pleading procedures are extremely technical and complicated and are particularly dangerous to the party against whom the motion is made.”
dictionary.law.com

Try to explain it in your own words. I'll understand if you cant lol
