OK Boomer

100% That is simply a logical example.

No one has called for 100% taxation and you said before that you document your facts, so here's your chance...document the "fact" that we are calling for 100% taxation.

If you can't, that means you were lying.

I'll wait.
 
When its documented and proven that a 100% tax rate will not and cannot sustain all the SOCIAL PROGRAMS promised by the leftist politician.....what makes you declare LESS than 100% will work?

Really? Where's that documented? Nowhere because it's a load of horseshit.

GDP is $21T...our current federal spending is just $4T.

So there's plenty of cash to pay for things.

Why are you lying?
 
Where was the doom and gloom?

Because all I remember were Conservatives like Julie Boonstra who lied about their health care because they wanted to fool people into opposing Obama.

Obama in his, "I am a failure", Joblessness is the future of America speech in 2010, admits to being the doom and gloom socialist ...

"we (I) stopped paying attention to the fact that, yeah, leadership isn't just legislation, that it's a matter of persuading people and giving them confidence and bringing them together, and setting a tone.

"We (I) haven't always been successful at that, and I take personal responsibility for that."

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wo...s-of-unemployment-being-new-normal-in-US.html
 
Look at you dropping some knowledge this morning. You hit on the fundamental point (which is bigger than the usual 'vote Democrat' or 'vote Republican') about what drives politicians (and voters who don't hold politicians responsible thus enabling the behavior).

I'll offer a local example but there are hundreds of them. Homelessness in San Francisco. We all want to help. Local government tells us we need more money to deal with the problem We have ballot measures that pass to raise taxes for more money to spend on the homeless. Yet over time the problem continues to get worse. Then politicians then say we need even more money... At a certain point the issue is more than funding.

That example applies to many other government programs. When they don't function how we would like we instantly call for more money instead of asking how can we better run this program? What changes can we make?

On a separate point remember the income tax was sold at the time as something that would only apply to the uber rich? We see how that ended up. Similar to what they are doing today with the wealth tax.

Exactly, my friend. Governments receive revenue from taxes. They have no incentive to work efficiently or frugally. If they spend too much, they just raise taxes to make up the difference. It's up to the people to reign their frivolous, irresponsible spending.
 
Obama in his, "I am a failure", Joblessness is the future of America speech in 2010, admits to being the doom and gloom socialist ...

"we (I) stopped paying attention to the fact that, yeah, leadership isn't just legislation, that it's a matter of persuading people and giving them confidence and bringing them together, and setting a tone.

"We (I) haven't always been successful at that, and I take personal responsibility for that."

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wo...s-of-unemployment-being-new-normal-in-US.html

Right, and starting March 2010, Obama presided over the longest period of job creation ever, and by the end of 2010, we were out of the recession your policies during Bush the Dumber caused.

So, you said it was 8 years of doom and gloom, but the best you could do is post a half-quote from 2010.
 
Exactly, my friend. Governments receive revenue from taxes. They have no incentive to work efficiently or frugally. If they spend too much, they just raise taxes to make up the difference. It's up to the people to reign their frivolous, irresponsible spending.

Medicare for All is wasteful spending, but a $30M golden parachute for a CEO who broke his own company's rules about sexual relationships isn't.
 
So far, I've only met six other Americans who I'd consider both Social Democrat and Ethnic Nationalist. However, in Europe, this is quickly becoming the norm. In Europe, the Right is actually very liberal. European Righties will often say things like, Europe needs to stay white so we can keep our welfare states and have rights for women and gays.

You just failed geography. The United States isn't in Europe.
 
Medicare for All is wasteful spending, but a $30M golden parachute for a CEO who broke his own company's rules about sexual relationships isn't, according to the guy who says all rich people work hard and follow the rules...like the McDonald's CEO who didn't follow the rules, but walked away with $30M.

 
not buying all this LV

I raged against the machine until around 30, full-blown counter culture/hippie, when had to make some money to raise a Gen Xer. So that means I sold younger generations out, took all the money and ran, right?

you're coming off very angry and lashing out, blaming the older generation for all the evils of the world

that's the same thing the boomers were doing in the 60's, 70's, and into the 80's

direct your rage directly where it belongs, the Elite Class

It's not Boomers. It's Boomers on weed.
 
:) After WW2, the US was the Industrial Base to the World. Most High School Graduates could find a good paying Factory Job. College was cheap and affordable. After Bretton Woods, the US Dollar was the World Reserve Currency, effectively making the US #1 in the New World Order. We were handed EVERYTHING.
The Boomers took on War, Racial Strife, Woman's Equality, Drugs, Free Speech, and a Social Awareness. They did fairly well as Youth. As they aged, they lost their edge, became complacent, got fat, got lazy, and somehow ... watched Gore NOT win ... and then watched Hillary NOT win ... and now ... we sit here, sucking our thumbs, watching Trump shit on the Flag.
(scratching head) I'm not real sure how it happened, but we sure have let down the next generation.

Not all Boomers. Just the ones on weed.
 
Love it...

"Capitalism doesn't require any central planning or distribution of resources and personnel..."

Except that is exactly the job description of COO at any business.
 
Truth: Any of you Social Justice Warriors on the left. "Feel" free to present documentable, reproducible facts in evidence to refute this truth. You will not....because you cannot. Why? You have been indoctrinated into the BIG LIE. Capitalism is about Greed and Socialism is about Need......that is an inverted projected lie by those who teach theory vs. working in the REAL WORLD. How many of the democrats running for POTUS have EVER actually worked in the REAL WORLD? Yeah.....slinging drinks to drunks certainly qualifies someone to make economic policy for the entire REPUBLIC. :bigthink:

https://www.prageru.com/video/capitalism-vs-socialism/
 
Last edited:
Truth: Any of you Social Justice Warriors on the left. "Feel" free to present documentable, reproducible facts in evidence to refute this truth. You will not....because you cannot. Why? You have been indoctrinated into the BIG LIE. Capitalism is about Greed and Socialism is about Need......that is an inverted projected lie by those who teach theory vs. working in the REAL WORLD. How many of the democrats running for POTUS have EVER actually worked in the REAL WORLD? Yeah.....slinging drinks to drunks certainly qualifies someone to make economic policy for the entire REPUBLIC. :bigthink:

https://www.prageu.com/video/capitalism-vs-socialism/

PragerU, short for Prager University, is an American non-profit organization co-founded by talk show host and writer Dennis Prager that creates videos on various political, economic and philosophical topics from a conservative or right-wing perspective.

Is that where your degree is from?
 
PragerU, short for Prager University, is an American non-profit organization co-founded by talk show host and writer Dennis Prager that creates videos on various political, economic and philosophical topics from a conservative or right-wing perspective.

Is that where your degree is from?

Yeah....I've "heard of SPEED READING"....but never of SPEED VIEWING a 5 min. video in seconds. Yeah.....typical of a leftist. You can't refute the truth...so you deflect by attempting to KILL THE MESSENGER without even addressing the FACTS presented.

But...you don't deal in ad hominem EMTIONALILSM. Yeah...…..:bigthink:

FYI: Just what stops a PERSPECTIVE from being correct and truthful? You must prosecute YOUR OPINION and provide FACTS that refutes the perspective.....having a POSITION/PERSPECTIVE does not make that position FALSE. I wonder why you offered nothing to refute that perspective? :laugh: Better yet.....I wonder why you have provided NO FACTS in evidence in this entire thread:readit::dunno:
 
Last edited:
Back
Top