Where is Trump's Beautiful Healthcare Plan? Here's Warren's...

There was a change in 2005. It made no significant difference.

In 2003, the Bush Administration opposed GSE reform, pulling the bill from the committees, surprising even Republican Mike Oxley.

Oxley pulls bill under fire from Bush
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/oxley-pulls-fannie-freddie-bill-under-heat-from-bush

By 2005, it didn't matter what was done because by that point, Conservatives had already reduced lending standards for subprimes.


No, that happened in 2007-2008, after housing prices started dropping

The only reason housing prices started dropping was because of delinquent subprime mortgages issued just a couple years prior.

Untitled.jpg
 
Today, administration officials say there is substantial evidence to conclude that Bush's home ownership push backfired and it caused the 2008 Great Recession.

Not only that, but the Bush Tax Cuts were also responsible for the economic collapse, as Bush tied his tax cuts to the housing market as he was campaigning in 2004:

Bush Ties Policy to Record Home Ownership
Touting his tax cuts as the economy's savior — and pointing to the strong housing market as proof — Bush said "more people own their own home now than ever."
https://www.foxnews.com/story/bush-ties-policy-to-record-home-ownership

So Bush tied his tax cuts to the housing market that would collapse just three years later.

So remember that whenever anyone tries to say that Bush's tax cuts had nothing to do with the collapse.

The reason Conservatives inflated a housing market in 2004 was because their tax cut failed to deliver on any of the promises made of them, and they had to give the impression the economy was growing as a result of the tax cuts when it was actually growing as a result of debt.
 
Read it and weep, sucker. You're timeline is all wrong. The mortgage crisis happened shortly after Bush Jr signed this into law, not 1995: On December 16, 2003, President George W. Bush signed into law the American Dream Downpayment Initiative, which was aimed at helping approximately "40,000 families a year" with their down payment and closing costs.

Now, here's the thing...the American Dream Downpayment Act wasn't actually responsible for the decline in lending standards for subprime loans.

None of the mortgage in the ADDI were subprime loans. Instead, the ADDI provided qualifying, low-income applicants with assistance funds in the form of a forgivable, soft second mortgage, up to six percent of the sale price, not to exceed $10,000. These funds can be used to cover some or all of the downpayment and closing costs. You could only use it towards home purchases that were FHA-backed. And the FHA didn't touch subprimes because of how risky and toxic they are.

In fact, mortgages issued as part of the ADDI had lower delinquency rates than mortgages that weren't part of the ADDI.

Also, it didn't end up being 40,000 families. It ended up being about 4,000.

The ADDI itself isn't bad policy...it's good policy.

The crisis was rooted in the performance of private subprime loans issued between 2004-2007 that had "dramatically weakened" lending standards.

That's why this chart shows massive spikes for subprime delinquencies for loans issued from 2005-2007, but that same spike doesn't appear for subprimes issued in 2002:

Untitled.jpg
 
Now, here's the thing...the American Dream Downpayment Act wasn't actually responsible for the decline in lending standards for subprime loans.

None of the mortgage in the ADDI were subprime loans. Instead, the ADDI provided qualifying, low-income applicants with assistance funds in the form of a forgivable, soft second mortgage, up to six percent of the sale price, not to exceed $10,000. These funds can be used to cover some or all of the downpayment and closing costs. You could only use it towards home purchases that were FHA-backed. And the FHA didn't touch subprimes because of how risky and toxic they are.

In fact, mortgages issued as part of the ADDI had lower delinquency rates than mortgages that weren't part of the ADDI.

Also, it didn't end up being 40,000 families. It ended up being about 4,000.

The ADDI itself isn't bad policy...it's good policy.

The crisis was rooted in the performance of private subprime loans issued between 2004-2007 that had "dramatically weakened" lending standards.

That's why this chart shows massive spikes for subprime delinquencies for loans issued from 2005-2007, but that same spike doesn't appear for subprimes issued in 2002:

View attachment 12479

I guess Into-The-Night is a Bush jr apologist as well as a Trump dick sucker.
 
Not only that, but the Bush Tax Cuts were also responsible for the economic collapse, as Bush tied his tax cuts to the housing market as he was campaigning in 2004:

Bush Ties Policy to Record Home Ownership
Touting his tax cuts as the economy's savior — and pointing to the strong housing market as proof — Bush said "more people own their own home now than ever."
https://www.foxnews.com/story/bush-ties-policy-to-record-home-ownership

So Bush tied his tax cuts to the housing market that would collapse just three years later.

So remember that whenever anyone tries to say that Bush's tax cuts had nothing to do with the collapse.

The reason Conservatives inflated a housing market in 2004 was because their tax cut failed to deliver on any of the promises made of them, and they had to give the impression the economy was growing as a result of the tax cuts when it was actually growing as a result of debt.

Then they blamed the housing crash on Black who they say really "didn't qualify" for loans.

They blame Blacks for everything.
 
Then they blamed the housing crash on Black who they say really "didn't qualify" for loans. They blame Blacks for everything.

Yes they do.

The people who really tanked the housing market were those who went on home buying/flipping frenzies from 2005-2007. Most of those people? White.
 
Bush drive for home ownership fueled housing bubble

WASHINGTON — "We can put light where there's darkness, and hope where there's despondency in this country. And part of it is working together as a nation to encourage folks to own their own home."

- President George W. Bush, Oct. 15, 2002

The global financial system was teetering on the edge of collapse when Bush and his economics team huddled in the Roosevelt Room of the White House for a briefing that, in the words of one participant, "scared the hell out of everybody."

It was Sept. 18. Lehman Brothers had just gone belly-up, overwhelmed by toxic mortgages. Bank of America had swallowed Merrill Lynch in a hastily arranged sale. Two days earlier, Bush had agreed to pump $85 billion into the failing insurance giant American International Group.

The president listened as Ben Bernanke, chairman of the Federal Reserve, laid out the latest terrifying news: The credit markets, gripped by panic, had frozen overnight, and banks were refusing to lend money.

Then his Treasury secretary, Henry Paulson Jr., told him that to stave off disaster, he would have to sign off on the biggest government bailout in history. Bush, according to several people in the room, paused for a single, stunned moment to take it all in.

"How," he wondered aloud, "did we get here?"

Eight years after arriving in Washington vowing to spread the dream of home ownership, Bush is leaving office, as he himself said recently, "faced with the prospect of a global meltdown" with roots in the housing sector he so ardently championed.

But the story of how the United States got here is solely one of Bush's own making, according to a review of his tenure that included interviews with dozens of current and former administration officials.

From his earliest days in office, Bush paired his belief that Americans do best when they own their own homes with his conviction that markets do best when left alone. Bush pushed hard to expand home ownership, especially among minority groups, an initiative that dovetailed with both his ambition to expand Republican appeal and the business interests of some of his biggest donors. But his housing policies and hands-off approach to regulation encouraged lax lending standards.

"There is no question we did not recognize the severity of the problems," said Al Hubbard, Bush's former chief economic adviser, who left the White House in December 2007.

And both Paulson and his predecessor, John Snow, say the housing push went too far.

"The Bush administration took a lot of pride that home ownership had reached historic highs," Snow said during an interview. "But what we forgot in the process was that it has to be done in the context of people being able to afford their house. We now realize there was a high cost."

Lawrence Lindsay, Bush's first chief economic adviser, said there was little impetus to raise alarms about the proliferation of easy credit that was helping Bush meet housing goals.

"No one wanted to stop that bubble," Lindsay said. "It would have conflicted with the president's own policies."

Today, millions of Americans are facing foreclosure, home ownership rates are virtually no higher than when Bush took office, Fannie and Freddie are in a government conservatorship, and the bailout cost to taxpayers could run in the trillions of dollars.

As the economy has shed jobs - 533,000 last month alone - and his party has been punished by irate voters, the weakened president has granted his Treasury secretary extraordinary leeway in managing the crisis.

In recent weeks Bush has shared his views of how the nation came to the brink of economic disaster. He cites corporate greed and market excesses fueled by a flood of foreign cash - "Wall Street got drunk," he has said - and the policies of past administrations. He blames Congress for failing to reform Fannie and Freddie.

Last week, Fox News asked Bush if he was worried about being the Herbert Hoover of the 21st century. "No," Bush replied. "I will be known as somebody who saw a problem and put the chips on the table to prevent the economy from collapsing."

Darrin West could not believe it. The president of the United States was standing in his living room. It was June 17, 2002, a day West recalls as "the highlight of my life." Bush, in Atlanta to introduce a plan to increase the number of minority homeowners by 5.5 million, was touring Park Place South, a development of starter homes in a neighborhood once marked by blight and crime.

"Part of economic security," Bush declared that day, "is owning your own home."

So Bush had to, in his words, "use the mighty muscle of the federal government" to meet his goal. He proposed affordable housing tax incentives. He insisted that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac meet ambitious new goals for low-income lending.

Concerned that down payments were a barrier, Bush persuaded Congress to spend as much as $200 million a year to help first-time buyers with down payments and closing costs.

And he pushed to allow first-time buyers to qualify for government insured mortgages with no money down. Republican congressional leaders and some housing advocates balked, arguing that homeowners with no stake in their investments would be more prone to walk away, as West did. Many economic experts, including some in the White House, now share that view.


The president also leaned on mortgage brokers and lenders to devise their own innovations. "Corporate America," he said, "has a responsibility to work to make America a compassionate place."

And corporate America, eyeing a lucrative market, delivered in ways Bush might not have expected, with a proliferation of too-good-to-be-true teaser rates and interest-only loans that were sold to investors in a loosely regulated environment. But Bush populated the financial system's alphabet soup of oversight agencies with people who, like him, wanted fewer rules, not more.

The president's first chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission promised a "kinder, gentler" agency. The second was pushed out amid industry complaints that he was too aggressive. Under its current leader, the agency failed to police the catastrophic decisions that toppled the investment bank Bear Stearns and contributed to the current crisis, according to a recent inspector general's report.

As for Bush's banking regulators, they once brandished a chain saw over a 9,000-page pile of regulations as they promised to ease burdens on the industry. When states tried to use consumer protection laws to crack down on predatory lending, the comptroller of the currency blocked the effort, asserting that states had no authority over national banks.

The administration won that fight at the Supreme Court. But Roy Cooper, North Carolina's attorney general, said, "They took 50 sheriffs off the beat at a time when lending was becoming the Wild West."

The president did push rules aimed at requiring lenders to explain loan terms more clearly. But the White House shelved them in 2004, after industry-friendly members of Congress threatened to block confirmation of his new housing secretary.

In the 2004 election cycle, mortgage bankers and brokers poured nearly $847,000 into Bush's re-election campaign, more than triple their contributions in 2000, according to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics. The administration did not complete the new rules until last month.

Today, administration officials say there is substantial evidence to conclude that Bush's home ownership push backfired and it caused the 2008 Great Recession.


tenor.gif

Told ya..........Blame Blacks.
 
I'm sure they'll be back under a different ID that just argues all the same stupid shit from before.

I know this Bush Mortgage Bubble stuff inside and out.

Yeah, and you know after it happened the Bush Spin Team led by Karl Rove put their damage control plan to work and put the blame on something Clinton did ten years earlier. And their right wing minions swallowed it hook, line and sinker.
 
Read it and weep, sucker. You're timeline is all wrong. The mortgage crisis happened shortly after Bush Jr signed this into law, not 1995:
On December 16, 2003, President George W. Bush signed into law the American Dream Downpayment Initiative, which was aimed at helping approximately "40,000 families a year" with their down payment and closing costs.


Bush drive for home ownership fueled housing bubble

WASHINGTON — "We can put light where there's darkness, and hope where there's despondency in this country. And part of it is working together as a nation to encourage folks to own their own home."

- President George W. Bush, Oct. 15, 2002

The global financial system was teetering on the edge of collapse when Bush and his economics team huddled in the Roosevelt Room of the White House for a briefing that, in the words of one participant, "scared the hell out of everybody."

It was Sept. 18. Lehman Brothers had just gone belly-up, overwhelmed by toxic mortgages. Bank of America had swallowed Merrill Lynch in a hastily arranged sale. Two days earlier, Bush had agreed to pump $85 billion into the failing insurance giant American International Group.

The president listened as Ben Bernanke, chairman of the Federal Reserve, laid out the latest terrifying news: The credit markets, gripped by panic, had frozen overnight, and banks were refusing to lend money.

Then his Treasury secretary, Henry Paulson Jr., told him that to stave off disaster, he would have to sign off on the biggest government bailout in history. Bush, according to several people in the room, paused for a single, stunned moment to take it all in.

"How," he wondered aloud, "did we get here?"

Eight years after arriving in Washington vowing to spread the dream of home ownership, Bush is leaving office, as he himself said recently, "faced with the prospect of a global meltdown" with roots in the housing sector he so ardently championed.

But the story of how the United States got here is solely one of Bush's own making, according to a review of his tenure that included interviews with dozens of current and former administration officials.

From his earliest days in office, Bush paired his belief that Americans do best when they own their own homes with his conviction that markets do best when left alone. Bush pushed hard to expand home ownership, especially among minority groups, an initiative that dovetailed with both his ambition to expand Republican appeal and the business interests of some of his biggest donors. But his housing policies and hands-off approach to regulation encouraged lax lending standards.

"There is no question we did not recognize the severity of the problems," said Al Hubbard, Bush's former chief economic adviser, who left the White House in December 2007.

And both Paulson and his predecessor, John Snow, say the housing push went too far.

"The Bush administration took a lot of pride that home ownership had reached historic highs," Snow said during an interview. "But what we forgot in the process was that it has to be done in the context of people being able to afford their house. We now realize there was a high cost."

Lawrence Lindsay, Bush's first chief economic adviser, said there was little impetus to raise alarms about the proliferation of easy credit that was helping Bush meet housing goals.

"No one wanted to stop that bubble," Lindsay said. "It would have conflicted with the president's own policies."

Today, millions of Americans are facing foreclosure, home ownership rates are virtually no higher than when Bush took office, Fannie and Freddie are in a government conservatorship, and the bailout cost to taxpayers could run in the trillions of dollars.

As the economy has shed jobs - 533,000 last month alone - and his party has been punished by irate voters, the weakened president has granted his Treasury secretary extraordinary leeway in managing the crisis.

In recent weeks Bush has shared his views of how the nation came to the brink of economic disaster. He cites corporate greed and market excesses fueled by a flood of foreign cash - "Wall Street got drunk," he has said - and the policies of past administrations. He blames Congress for failing to reform Fannie and Freddie.

Last week, Fox News asked Bush if he was worried about being the Herbert Hoover of the 21st century. "No," Bush replied. "I will be known as somebody who saw a problem and put the chips on the table to prevent the economy from collapsing."

Darrin West could not believe it. The president of the United States was standing in his living room. It was June 17, 2002, a day West recalls as "the highlight of my life." Bush, in Atlanta to introduce a plan to increase the number of minority homeowners by 5.5 million, was touring Park Place South, a development of starter homes in a neighborhood once marked by blight and crime.

"Part of economic security," Bush declared that day, "is owning your own home."

So Bush had to, in his words, "use the mighty muscle of the federal government" to meet his goal. He proposed affordable housing tax incentives. He insisted that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac meet ambitious new goals for low-income lending.

Concerned that down payments were a barrier, Bush persuaded Congress to spend as much as $200 million a year to help first-time buyers with down payments and closing costs.

And he pushed to allow first-time buyers to qualify for government insured mortgages with no money down. Republican congressional leaders and some housing advocates balked, arguing that homeowners with no stake in their investments would be more prone to walk away, as West did. Many economic experts, including some in the White House, now share that view.


The president also leaned on mortgage brokers and lenders to devise their own innovations. "Corporate America," he said, "has a responsibility to work to make America a compassionate place."

And corporate America, eyeing a lucrative market, delivered in ways Bush might not have expected, with a proliferation of too-good-to-be-true teaser rates and interest-only loans that were sold to investors in a loosely regulated environment. But Bush populated the financial system's alphabet soup of oversight agencies with people who, like him, wanted fewer rules, not more.

The president's first chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission promised a "kinder, gentler" agency. The second was pushed out amid industry complaints that he was too aggressive. Under its current leader, the agency failed to police the catastrophic decisions that toppled the investment bank Bear Stearns and contributed to the current crisis, according to a recent inspector general's report.

As for Bush's banking regulators, they once brandished a chain saw over a 9,000-page pile of regulations as they promised to ease burdens on the industry. When states tried to use consumer protection laws to crack down on predatory lending, the comptroller of the currency blocked the effort, asserting that states had no authority over national banks.

The administration won that fight at the Supreme Court. But Roy Cooper, North Carolina's attorney general, said, "They took 50 sheriffs off the beat at a time when lending was becoming the Wild West."

The president did push rules aimed at requiring lenders to explain loan terms more clearly. But the White House shelved them in 2004, after industry-friendly members of Congress threatened to block confirmation of his new housing secretary.

In the 2004 election cycle, mortgage bankers and brokers poured nearly $847,000 into Bush's re-election campaign, more than triple their contributions in 2000, according to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics. The administration did not complete the new rules until last month.

Today, administration officials say there is substantial evidence to conclude that Bush's home ownership push backfired and it caused the 2008 Great Recession.

Nope. The conditions for the 2007 crash were set up in 1995. BTW, those conditions are still there, and will cause another crash in the same way, given time.
 
the 2007 crash was all on ted Kennedy and the gay nut**bag from Massachusetts Barney Frank
"Every American deserves a house even if he cant make his mortgage payment"

trump is trying to set up a long term barrier, #MAGA
and with a little help he can do it

Democrats are going to lose the house in 2020
then he can
 
Nope. The conditions for the 2007 crash were set up in 1995. BTW, those conditions are still there, and will cause another crash in the same way, given time.

Nope, apparently you didn't read all the details of my posted article or you're blinded by the right. If the conditions of the crash were set up in 1995, the crash would've happened shortly thereafter. Not ten years later. Bush Jr's American Dream Downpayment Act was signed into law in 2002. The bubble started in 2004 and the crash in 2008. There's your timeline. Are you old enough to remember in 2004 when everybody was buying homes and it was the biggest buyer's market in decades? I remember when my brother-in-law who is a Real Estate Broker said in 2004, "Everyone is buying a home. Even those who can't afford the downpayment. This isn't going to end well". He could see what was happening because of Bush Jr's American Dream Downpayment Act of 2002.

And Bush Jr pushed to allow first-time buyers to qualify for government insured mortgages with no money down. Republican congressional leaders and some housing advocates balked, arguing that homeowners with no stake in their investments would be more prone to walk away, as West did. Many economic experts, including some in the White House, now share that view.

People who bought houses with no money down walked away from their mortgages and stuck the banks with the bill. That's how the mortgage crisis happened.
But hey, you're doing pretty good damage control for your buddy Bush Jr. Are you his wife?

tenor.gif
 
the 2007 crash was all on ted Kennedy and the gay nut**bag from Massachusetts Barney Frank
"Every American deserves a house even if he cant make his mortgage payment"

trump is trying to set up a long term barrier, #MAGA
and with a little help he can do it

Democrats are going to lose the house in 2020
then he can

And then you can continue to suck Trump's dick.

funny_redneck_crazy_face_animated_gif_by_bensib-d4is1um.gif
 
Nope, apparently you didn't read all the details of my posted article or you're blinded by the right. If the conditions of the crash were set up in 1995, the crash would've happened shortly thereafter. Not ten years later.
WRONG. Crashes can easily take 10 or even 20 years to materialize.
Bush Jr's American Dream Downpayment Act was signed into law in 2002. The bubble started in 2004 and the crash in 2008. There's your timeline.
This act didn't help, but the initial conditions occurred in 1995.
Are you old enough to remember in 2004 when everybody was buying homes and it was the biggest buyer's market in decades?
Much older.
I remember when my brother-in-law who is a Real Estate Broker said in 2004, "Everyone is buying a home. Even those who can't afford the downpayment. This isn't going to end well".
He was right, too.
He could see what was happening because of Bush Jr's American Dream Downpayment Act of 2002.
Again, this act didn't help, but the initial conditions were set up in 1995.
And Bush Jr pushed to allow first-time buyers to qualify for government insured mortgages with no money down.

No, the BANKS did. You seem to forget the part about the credit cards and other loans.
Republican congressional leaders and some housing advocates balked, arguing that homeowners with no stake in their investments would be more prone to walk away, as West did. Many economic experts, including some in the White House, now share that view.
No. People walk away because their investment went bad. Housing prices dropped. That's what triggered the crash.
People who bought houses with no money down walked away from their mortgages and stuck the banks with the bill.
No, the housing prices dropped.
That's how the mortgage crisis happened.
No, the housing prices dropped.
 
That's just not true, dude. How would you know that? How many tax forms have you looked at of wealthy people? Or is that what Bernie Sanders told you?

It's the old scripture from that liberal chant, designed to get you to hate wealthy people.

I am wealthy. I pay a considerable amount of taxes because of it.
 
WRONG. Crashes can easily take 10 or even 20 years to materialize.

This act didn't help, but the initial conditions occurred in 1995.

Much older.

He was right, too.

Again, this act didn't help, but the initial conditions were set up in 1995.

No, the BANKS did. You seem to forget the part about the credit cards and other loans.

No. People walk away because their investment went bad. Housing prices dropped. That's what triggered the crash.

No, the housing prices dropped.

No, the housing prices dropped.

Sorry, but you offer zero proof that "initial conditions were set up in 1995".
And your comment "Crashes can easily take 10 or even 20 years to materialize" may be true in some cases...but not this one. Again, no proof, just sold speculation.

"People walk away because their investment went bad". Really? How could you possibly know that? Fact is, you don't. Their investment went bad (housing prices dropped) because people walked away from their mortgages because they couldn't afford the monthly payments. People don't walk away from their homes because they've lost value. Are you kidding? Think about what you're saying. If someone bought a house for $500.000 and the value drops to $400.000, why would they default on their mortgage, ruin their credit, disrupt their lives, uproot their family all because their house temporarily lost value? It's a lame excuse as are all your others.

You seem to desperately want to believe that Clinton shoulders the blame for some strange reason. Are you sure you're not Laura Bush?
 
Back
Top