areyou clueless about everything? asking Zelensky for a favor to investigate corruption is perfectly fine
Yes, Gonzo is clueless about everything and a pathological lying buffoon.
areyou clueless about everything? asking Zelensky for a favor to investigate corruption is perfectly fine
areyou clueless about everything? asking Zelensky for a favor to investigate corruption is perfectly fine
You Trumperoos are such fibbers.
You still think what Trump gives you is the truth? LMAO
And other information was left out. What was released is damning enough; what are you afraid of -- even more damning information?
Can you point to where in the transcript the Toddler Tyrant asked about investigating corruption? Or are we to pretend that that's what he was talking about when he mentioned the Bidens and only the Bidens?
Nope, it's around the neck of the Betrayer-in-Chief.
This is the most transparent setup I have ever seen. Trump may be guilty of some charges but it is laughable that the star witnesses just happen to have ties to Biden and are registered Democrats. I honestly think the ass party will pay a price next year.
gonna be hilarious watching the wingers hurl Soviet propaganda and squirm like toads during these PUBLIC hearings, just like comrade annie is doing already
MUCH more entertaining than Watergate
Vlad's dream come true of installing Trump as POTUS has morphed into a nightmare, will dash his hopes of Making America Communist
House Minority Whip Steve Scalise addressed today what he called an unfair and politically motivated “Soviet-style” impeachment process.
This is the most transparent setup I have ever seen. Trump may be guilty of some charges but it is laughable that the star witnesses just happen to have ties to Biden and are registered Democrats. I honestly think the ass party will pay a price next year.
President Betrayer is going down. You all are just going to have to deal with that.
Last night Colbert mocked Steve Scalise's moronic comment...
Colbert pointed out that like Stalin...Soviet style impeachment means they died.
And you know this how? So you don't think that a fellow veteran could be honorable or honest unless he votes (R)? And isn't this exactly the same thing said about the unknown whistleblower?
![]()
Lol, yes, he wanted what was omitted placed back in. He also objected to them putting it in the classified server. He objected to what the WH lawyers omitted, imagine that. He wanted the truth.
I think you're grasping at straws. There's no proof of these witnesses' "ties to Biden" nor any of their voting record. Transparent, eh? What happened to all the crying from the RWers about "secret hearings" and "we want transparency"? So now you got it, and you're STILL crying.
President Betrayer is going down. You all are just going to have to deal with that.
Owl you are wearing blinders. Look beyond MSNBC's biased reporting. It is a matter of record that Vindman worked for Biden!
I have to question how sincere you are about your fealty to the Buddhist tenets of integrity, honesty, and acting in good faith.areyou clueless about everything? asking Zelensky for a favor toinvestigate corruptiondig up dirt on Trump's 2020 domestic political opponent is perfectly fine
Yesterday, Lt Col Alexander Vindman, a member of the National Security Council, testified in Adam Schiff’s kangaroo court in the basement of the Capitol Building…the coup continues.
Several things became readily apparent:
1) NSC members are not supposed to wear their uniforms (the theatrical presence), and
2) Adam Schiff shut down ANY Republican questions, only allowing Democrats to question the witness, 3) Vindman admitted attempting to alter the President’s transcript of the Ukraine call but was unsuccessful in two cases,
4) Vindman admitted attempting to share the President’s classified call to other operatives.
Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, told House impeachment investigators on Tuesday that the White House transcript of a July call between President Trump and Ukraine’s president omitted crucial words and phrases, and that his attempts to include them failed, according to three people familiar with the testimony https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...ft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/
Vindman claimed that there were at least two omissions in the White House transcript, so he set about to alter it to put the omissions back.
But the left wing NYT said that even with the phrases gone, the understanding of the transcript wasn’t changed.
But of course, the left is seizing on the transcript not being “exact” and shrieking that it was not a true transcript.
Vindman believes that if the Ukraine pursued the investigation of Hunter Biden, they would lose bipartisan support. So the coup continues again.
We have undue influence or crimes possibly committed by an American connected to a high government official that may have caused serious national security issues and he didn’t want the US or the Ukraine to investigate it. What are his connections to Biden and the Democrats?
We have the possibility that this Lt Col violated US code 18 USC 798 in sharing a classified call with others.
~~
When Rep Jordan attempted to ask Vindman who he shared the information with, Adam Schiff shut down the question.
Vindman’s testimony causes serious problems for the President, even though it is fraught with the admission of leaking, altering a document, etc. If arrogance was against the US Code, we could probably prosecute Vindman for that.
Don't try to put words in my mouth. Do a bio on Vindman and you will see he is a registered Democrat (no big deal) but then you find that he worked directly for Biden and as an higher ranking officer I would have expected him to remain neutral and only come forward if he had witnessed illegal activity, which has not been proven happened at this point. Thus far I have yet to see a real smoking gun. The only info we get is biased for and against. Now that this kangaroo court has been brought into the light we may finally start getting some real answers.
Vindman claims he voiced his concerns to his superiors and they did nothing. Are you suggesting these people most likely veterans also aren't honest? That is what you are saying about me.
Now I put it to you if a person running for office has committed or abetted in shall we say devious dealings and his opponent believes it may have happened isn't that person bound to bring that to light?
WTF?
The dude admitted to trying to alter the transcript??