Teflon Don
I'm back baby
I am open to suggestions. I am supremely confident that Trump will not be impeached. You are whistling past the graveyard
Now they admit to a Quid Pro Quo...
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
I am open to suggestions. I am supremely confident that Trump will not be impeached. You are whistling past the graveyard
Okay, if there is a full house vote on impeachment before Trump's presidency is over, you get to pick my profile photo, if not I get to pick yours for two weeks. If Trump resigns all bets are off.
canceled.2021.3
Former Vice President
We are getting closer
1) impeachment vote by Thanksgiving
2) profile pictures and name
3) three months needs to have teeth
No, I doubt they will get it in by Thanksgiving. I’ll agree to two and three.
canceled.2021.3
Former Vice President
Christmas
Truth: The Trump administration can admit to a thousand supposed left wing violations.....and this bat shit crazy congress does not have the power to remove him from office through impeachment, as its the Senate that conducts a REAL INVESTIGATION and LEGAL HEARING....not congress who is constitutionally limited to political posturing moves only.
As Hillary endorsed, "If the impeachment provision in the Constitution of the United States will not reach the offenses charged here, then perhaps the 18th century Constitution should be abandoned to a 20th century paper shredder."
Why did she endorse such an outrageous position? She knows the procedure going on in congress right now is nothing but hubris GUM FLAPPING....and holds only political posturing with no method of actually removing the POTUS who is protected from any overreach by a co-equal branch of government.
How do WE THE PEOPLE know that SHITLESS and AA NANCY know this already? How many indictments have resulted for failure to appear based upon the power of their supposed SUBPONEAS?
-0-
Its nothing but another left wing propaganda dog and phony show.
Last edited:
Truth: The Trump administration can admit to a thousand supposed left wing violations.....and this bat shit crazy congress does not have the power to remove him from office through impeachment, as its the Senate that conducts a REAL INVESTIGATION and LEGAL HEARING....not congress who is constitutionally limited to political posturing moves only.
The Senate won’t investigate... only take the results of the House investigation and have a trial.
No, sorry you claimed they won’t vote, I say they will. It might be well after the new year. How about before Election Day 2020?
So you are declaring that the ASSUSED does not have the constitutional authority to defend themselves in a legal hearing.....no discovery, no subpoena power of their own, no investigative authority? Dumb ASS. And no.....your conclusion is just as bat shit crazy as Shitless and AA NANCY.....its takes more than a house investigation to authorize an impeachment hearing in the senate...it actually takes a formal on the record UP/DOWN vote by the congressional representative(s)….not a simple vote of any committee, especially when the judicial committee has not conducted the supposed legal investigation.
This would be tossed out before the ink was dry.....why? Even the POTUS is protected via the Bill of Rights and the US Constitution. No committee has the authority to deny DUE PROCESS in the form of the 4th, 5th, the 14th, amendments.
Here is a list of constitutional violations that Shitless and AA NANACY are violating as we speak.....under the articles of DUE PROCESS as stated in the Constitution and following amendments.
1. The right to a speedy and UNBIASED (a joke...right...err...left, Shitforbraines and Fancy are UNBIASED?) hearing/trial
2. The right to be provided with notice of criminal charges (Yeah....Shitless sure provided notice to the other side that he had spoken with and was preparing CRIMAINL CHARGES with a supposed whistle blower...no?) OR....civil actions involved in legal charges being actionable
3. The right to present REASON why such charges should not be taken
4. The right to present evidence and call witnesses
5. The right of discovery.....the right to know ahead of time the evidence held by those who are attempting to PROSECUTE those charges.
6. The right to cross examine any hostile witness
7. The right of representation via a qualified lawyer of choice
8. THE REQUIREMENT that the court or OTHER TRIBUNAL (the wink, wink, special impeachment non impeachment hearing
) prepare a written record of the existing evidence and prepared testimony of said evidence. Not hold a hearing to go fishing for evidence to charge someone of a crime....which is unconstitutional as hell. 9. And...the requirement that the court or OTHER TRIBUNAL present a written record of existing facts to the accused.
Yeah...…...legal as hell...……..NOT!
The SCOTUS would never allow such a travesty to remove a duly elected POTUS...especially a SCOTUS loaded with constitutional originalists.
Last edited:
So you are declaring that the ASSUSED does not have the constitutional authority to defend themselves in a legal hearing.....no discovery, no subpoena power of their own, no investigative authority? Dumb ASS. And no.....your conclusion is just as bat shit crazy as Shitless and AA NANCY.....its takes more than a house investigation to authorize an impeachment hearing in the senate...it actually takes a formal on the record UP/DOWN vote by the congressional representative(s)….not a simple vote of any committee, especially when the judicial committee has not conducted the supposed legal investigation.
This would be tossed out before the ink was dry.....why? Even the POTUS is protected via the Bill of Rights and the US Constitution. No committee has the authority to deny DUE PROCESS in the form of the 4th, 5th, the 14th, amendments.
Here is a list of constitutional violations that Shitless and AA NANACY are violating as we speak.....under the articles of DUE PROCESS as stated in the Constitution and following amendments.
1. The right to a speedy and UNBIASED (a joke...right...err...left, Shitforbraines and Fancy are UNBIASED?) hearing/trial
2. The right to be provided with notice of criminal charges (Yeah....Shitless sure provided notice to the other side that he spoken with and was preparing CRIMAINL CHARGES with a supposed whistle blower...no?) OR....civil actions involved in legal charges being actionable
3. The right to present REASON why such charges should not be taken
4. The right to present evidence and call witnesses
5. The right of discovery.....the right to know ahead of time the evidence held by those who are attempting to PROSECUTE those charges.
6. The right to cross examine any hostile witness
7. The right of representation via a qualified lawyer of choice
8. THE REQUIREMENT that the court or OTHER TRIBUNAL (the wink, wink, special impeachment non impeachment hearing
9. And...the requirement that the court or OTHER TRIBUNAL present a written record of existing facts to the accused.
Yeah...…...legal as hell...……..NOT!
Its not a legal hearing, but the Republicans will have the right to cross-examine witnesses and subpoena witnesses, The president always as every right to investigate anything he wants to investigate in any legal way he chooses.
canceled.2021.3
Former Vice President
canceled.2021.3
Former Vice President
Not according to you. You are trying to impeach him for it
Apparently you can commit crimes and just run for President and get off the hook if you are a democrat
Exactly: Finally an admission of stupidity....its not a legal hearing until it is prosecuted by THE SENATE, thus its all bluster, as you have about as much chance of removing this POTUS as you do of throwing a snowball through hell. But...even through the impeachment proceedings are not a Trial....they are considered a TRIBUNAL....a political tribunal....as an impeachment must by constitutional decree involve a judicial authority. That's the reason their piece of shit papers are not legal SUBPONEAS. They were not issued through the judicial authority of congress. Who ever heard of a hidden COVERT (intel committee) impeachment investigation?
When is that?
It is not a legal hearing, it is a constitutional hearing. It will not take place in a courtroom and the Rules of Evidence will not necessarily apply. The process in the Senate is what ever the Senators decide it is.
Even when prosecuted in the Senate is is a political process, not a legal one. The rules are whatever the Senate decides are the rules.
Yeah....show this conclusion to me IN THE CONSTITUTION.
The rules of impeachment are whatever the politicians decide they are? Really?
The Constitution, Article I, Section 3:
The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.
Judgment in Cases of Impeachments shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust, or Profit under the United States, but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment, and Punishmnet, according to Law.
AKA, as long as the Senate follows these rules they can do what they want as it relates to impeachment. They gave the power to the Senate not the Judiciary.
The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.
Judgment in Cases of Impeachments shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust, or Profit under the United States, but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment, and Punishmnet, according to Law.
AKA, as long as the Senate follows these rules they can do what they want as it relates to impeachment. They gave the power to the Senate not the Judiciary.
Plugs admitted it too.....to the world...smiling and laughing...got the prosecutor fired in exchange for the money..."go ask Obama".
Yeah.....Plugs said Bama was fine with it, too.
Grow up. Ukraine has a history of some corruption...we want some assurances before we hand over U.S. money.
Grow up.
Who is plugs and what did he admit to?