If anyone wants to know why Nancy Pelosi hasn't called a vote to impeach

Into the Night said:
No one spun the Mueller report except the Democrats.
Click to expand...

That is not true, billy barr got out in front of the report, framing what surely was a White House narrative that they could sell, and they did, they knew no one was going to read the report, see the one hundred plus contacts with Russians, comprehend Mueller's full explanation of defining collusion, but they will remember billy barr's characterization. "no collusion, no obstruction"
 
reagansghost said:
I channel surfed by Fox yesterday and watched a bit of Cucker's shithow………….ALL he did was whine about Nancy NOT impeaching Trump????

what the fuck is the right wing's hurry?

can one you Ruskie trolls NOT on my ignore list please answer?
Click to expand...

Can one of you left wing nls not run and hide behind the ignore list.
 
archives said:
That is not true, billy barr got out in front of the report, framing what surely was a White House narrative that they could sell, and they did, they knew no one was going to read the report, see the one hundred plus contacts with Russians, comprehend Mueller's full explanation of defining collusion, but they will remember billy barr's characterization. "no collusion, no obstruction"
Click to expand...


There was no collusion and no obstruction.
 
CFM
Verified User
This message is hidden because CFM is on your ignore list.
Today, 01:52 PM
CFM
Verified User
This message is hidden because CFM is on your ignore list.
Today, 01:53 PM
Into the Night
Verified User
This message is hidden because Into the Night is on your ignore list.
 
CFM said:
Democrats were talking about impeachment before Trump was inaugurated. If she was going to call for it, she would have already. Gutless bitch.
Click to expand...

Well, first off, the Democrats have only had control of the House for ten months now, so I don't know how she would call for impeachment before that, and why should she do it now, as I said, she has Trump and the White House on the ropes, slowly lesser subordinates are defying Trump, constructing a case, could only be a matter of time before one of the others gets nervous and comes forward, she is in no hurry
 
CFM said:
There was no collusion and no obstruction.
Click to expand...

According to billy barr, as I noted, he framed the interpretation, which is exactly why Trump appointed him, but even billy barr can't help Trump now especially when billy barr might be part of the inquiry
 
Originally Posted by CFM
Democrats were talking about impeachment before Trump was inaugurated. If she was going to call for it, she would have already. Gutless bitch.
Click to expand...

why the hurry for a vote?

I don't get it
 
archives said:
She doesn't have to have a full House vote to commence an inquiry, which she has done,
Click to expand...
Yes she does. The House can do NOTHING without a vote of the entire House. Nancy is not the Queen.
archives said:
to actually impeach she needs a full House vote
Click to expand...
Also true.
archives said:
And you people are kidding yourself, if she wanted the full House vote she could get it tomorrow,
Click to expand...
Apparently not. She so far has not done it.
archives said:
but why when she has Trump and the White House on the ropes collecting damaging information by the day
Click to expand...
They are not 'on the ropes'. They are going about their jobs, unlike Democrats in the House.
 
archives said:
Well, first off, the Democrats have only had control of the House for ten months now, so I don't know how she would call for impeachment before that, and why should she do it now, as I said, she has Trump and the White House on the ropes, slowly lesser subordinates are defying Trump, constructing a case, could only be a matter of time before one of the others gets nervous and comes forward, she is in no hurry
Click to expand...

I didn't say call for it. I said they were talking about impeachment before he was inaugurated.

She's in no hurry because she knows she has nothing.
 
archives said:
According to billy barr, as I noted, he framed the interpretation, which is exactly why Trump appointed him, but even billy barr can't help Trump now especially when billy barr might be part of the inquiry
Click to expand...

According to the facts, or lack thereof to be precise, there was no collusion and no obstruction.

Why are you still so mad your bitch got her ass kicked in 2016?
 
CFM said:
I didn't say call for it. I said they were talking about impeachment before he was inaugurated.

She's in no hurry because she knows she has nothing.
Click to expand...

Some Republicans called for Obama's impeachment nearly the entire eight years he was in office, says nothing, there is always a few with the quick rhetoric

And I told you why she isn't in any hurry, the dominoes are falling with each day's testimony, now she has Gov't officials past and present defying Trump's no cooperation order and appearing, so why should she stop now, every day becomes another concern for the White House
 
CFM said:
According to the facts, or lack thereof to be precise, there was no collusion and no obstruction.

Why are you still so mad your bitch got her ass kicked in 2016?
Click to expand...

Ah, no, Mueller himself laid out what he interpreted legally as collusion, and concluded was it too complex to proceed along those lines, but he did document the one hundred contacts with Russians, if you read it, which I'm sure you didn't, it seemed the Russians did everything but park cars

And I don't care either way about 2016, I had hoped Clinton got elected for the sake of the country, inwhich I was right, but if she had we would have missed all the endless entertainment Trump supplies plus witnessing how some of his supporters gulliblely will swallow anything to defend him
 
archives said:
Ah, no, Mueller himself laid out what he interpreted legally as collusion, and concluded was it too complex to proceed along those lines, but he did document the one hundred contacts with Russians, if you read it, which I'm sure you didn't, it seemed the Russians did everything but park cars

And I don't care either way about 2016, I had hoped Clinton got elected for the sake of the country, inwhich I was right, but if she had we would have missed all the endless entertainment Trump supplies plus witnessing how some of his supporters gulliblely will swallow anything to defend him
Click to expand...
cmon.. "No sufficient evidence of cordination" by Trump or ANY American. It was all the Russian hoax
 
reagansghost said:
wow, right wingers are sure in a HURRY to get Trump impeached by the House

wonder why that is?
Click to expand...

Because I know you don’t have the votes

Too many democrats in Trump districts.

If Nancy wants to lose her speakership then go for it

All I am asking is to vote on impeachment inquiry. Not on articles of impeachment. What’s the farm in voting on inquiry
 
Trump is like a pink slime burger on a red hot grill sizzling away

the longer he stays right where he is the more well-done he's gonna be
 
QuidProJoe said:
Because I know you don’t have the votes

Too many democrats in Trump districts.

If Nancy wants to lose her speakership then go for it

All I am asking is to vote on impeachment inquiry. Not on articles of impeachment. What’s the farm in voting on inquiry
Click to expand...

there's already 228 Dems for impeachment, what are you talking about?

Nancy doesn't need a vote for an inquiry, as Speaker of the House that's well within her power

y'all be desperate
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top