Nadler: 'Personally, I think the President ought to be impeached'

Phantasmal said:
Another Alice who hasn’t read the report.
Click to expand...

I have, what part do you have trouble with Phanny?

Mueller Report; Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.

Barr: Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.

Mueller Report; Page 182 V II:

I. CONCLUSION

Accordingly, ….. this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime…...
 
It is rather amusing, but sad, how delusional the left is regarding Trump and the PHONY Mueller investigation. But let's not fool ourselves; they know they are delusional. It doesn't matter to them that they are pathological liars. The only thing that matters is giving people the PERCEPTION that Trump is a clueless criminal. Facts don't matter.

This is why Americans need to wake up and ensure that these Fascistic Partisan morons in the Party of the Jackass remain marginalized away from the halls of power.
 
Hello deadcatbounce,

deadcatbounce said:
https://edition.cnn.com/2019/09/16/politics/jerry-nadler-impeachment-remarks/index.html

This is why this impeachment exercise will back fire on Democrats. It is not about facts, it is about feelings and personal opinion. Nadler is an idiot. He should be removed from office.

"Nadler acknowledged that the House should not go forward with impeachment unless it has the public's support — not just because the public would view it as undemocratic and it would "tear the country apart," but also because the votes won't be there without public support."
Click to expand...

Nadler is correct. You have not shown that his view is based on feelings rather than knowledge. Nadler is in a position to have detailed information on the subject. His view is thus more valuable than yours or mine. He is better informed.

deadcatbounce, I have reviewed your brief posting history in order to gain some insight on making a decision of whether or not I want to talk to you. Immediately, I don't like your posting name nor your avatar, which reflect cruelty and lack of compassion. Secondly, I have noted that you have a weakness for ad hominems. I suspect we won't be talking long. If you treat me the way you have treated others you will be in violation of my PIP and go on my permanent Ignore List.

I am only talking to you initially on a probationary basis. If you can rise to a basic mutual respect with me and engage in truly civil discourse you may be able to move beyond probationary status with me. If you attack me in any way, and that is totally your prerogative, it will only be once. You will then be placed on Ignore and I will never respond to you again after that.

I do appreciate that you keep your speech clean. That is commendable. And I would be quite happy to dispute policy, ideas, events with you on any issue. Feel completely free to attack my ideas and posts. I welcome any sincere but respectful criticism. But the moment you begin talking about me? We will be done. From the looks of your posts you don't appear able to resist. Prove me wrong and we might have some interesting discussions. Otherwise I hope you go off on me quickly resulting in a minimal waste of time.

I have a lot of friends here on both sides of the isle. But I don't have any hard right friends. They all seem to be unable to move beyond name-calling, put-downs, stereotyping and blaming. None of which I am interested in. Such negativity. If you can rise above that I would be proud to add your name to my friend list. There's always hope. Maybe you're the one. The best case would be you prove me wrong on my initial impression. Good luck.
 
PoliTalker said:
Hello deadcatbounce,



Nadler is correct. You have not shown that his view is based on feelings rather than knowledge. Nadler is in a position to have detailed information on the subject. His view is thus more valuable than yours or mine. He is better informed.

deadcatbounce, I have reviewed your brief posting history in order to gain some insight on making a decision of whether or not I want to talk to you. Immediately, I don't like your posting name nor your avatar, which reflect cruelty and lack of compassion. Secondly, I have noted that you have a weakness for ad hominems. I suspect we won't be talking long. If you treat me the way you have treated others you will be in violation of my PIP and go on my permanent Ignore List.

I am only talking to you initially on a probationary basis. If you can rise to a basic mutual respect with me and engage in truly civil discourse you may be able to move beyond probationary status with me. If you attack me in any way, and that is totally your prerogative, it will only be once. You will then be placed on Ignore and I will never respond to you again after that.

I do appreciate that you keep your speech clean. That is commendable. And I would be quite happy to dispute policy, ideas, events with you on any issue. Feel completely free to attack my ideas and posts. I welcome any sincere but respectful criticism. But the moment you begin talking about me? We will be done. From the looks of your posts you don't appear able to resist. Prove me wrong and we might have some interesting discussions. Otherwise I hope you go off on me quickly resulting in a minimal waste of time.

I have a lot of friends here on both sides of the isle. But I don't have any hard right friends. They all seem to be unable to move beyond name-calling, put-downs, stereotyping and blaming. None of which I am interested in. Such negativity. If you can rise above that I would be proud to add your name to my friend list. There's always hope. Maybe you're the one. The best case would be you prove me wrong on my initial impression. Good luck.
Click to expand...
The American people are in a position to know the facts. They are in the Mueller Report and Barr’s summation of that report.

No collusion and insufficient evidence to pursue obstruction.

I doubt that most Conservatives give a rat’s culo about your cowardly standards about which posters you will choose to ignore, Snowflake. I certainly don’t.
 
Nadler, el sapo (the frog) is re-litigating the Mueller Report.

He needs to return to the pond that he came from.
 
PoliTalker said:
Hello deadcatbounce,



Nadler is correct. You have not shown that his view is based on feelings rather than knowledge. Nadler is in a position to have detailed information on the subject. His view is thus more valuable than yours or mine. He is better informed.

deadcatbounce, I have reviewed your brief posting history in order to gain some insight on making a decision of whether or not I want to talk to you. Immediately, I don't like your posting name nor your avatar, which reflect cruelty and lack of compassion. Secondly, I have noted that you have a weakness for ad hominems. I suspect we won't be talking long. If you treat me the way you have treated others you will be in violation of my PIP and go on my permanent Ignore List.

I am only talking to you initially on a probationary basis. If you can rise to a basic mutual respect with me and engage in truly civil discourse you may be able to move beyond probationary status with me. If you attack me in any way, and that is totally your prerogative, it will only be once. You will then be placed on Ignore and I will never respond to you again after that.

I do appreciate that you keep your speech clean. That is commendable. And I would be quite happy to dispute policy, ideas, events with you on any issue. Feel completely free to attack my ideas and posts. I welcome any sincere but respectful criticism. But the moment you begin talking about me? We will be done. From the looks of your posts you don't appear able to resist. Prove me wrong and we might have some interesting discussions. Otherwise I hope you go off on me quickly resulting in a minimal waste of time.

I have a lot of friends here on both sides of the isle. But I don't have any hard right friends. They all seem to be unable to move beyond name-calling, put-downs, stereotyping and blaming. None of which I am interested in. Such negativity. If you can rise above that I would be proud to add your name to my friend list. There's always hope. Maybe you're the one. The best case would be you prove me wrong on my initial impression. Good luck.
Click to expand...

An eternal optomist...^^^LOL. Reminds me of Peter Sellers to George C Scott. "There is nothign to discuss, the man is obviously a psychotic"

He is a troll. That's what he is. Haters hate, trolls troll, ducks quack. He cannot meet your terms of service anymore than I can resist saying fuck you to Trumptards.
 
CharacterAssassin said:
^^^ LOL! Somebody must have learned a new word today!

No, sugartits, he's not re-litigating it.
Click to expand...

The bible : Do good.

Man does good.

Stop relitigating the bible!

The Mueller report TOLD us to impeach the criminal

Sorry "Earl", we are dismembering your insect. Manible torn off first, rip his thorax off SLOWLY, stick pins in his abdomen, and finally a merciful alcohol ctton ball before
pinning him in my cigar box for display.

I TOLD you years ago that was the plan. You are evil. We will destroy you by a million cuts. It's working.

NEVER do this to our America the beautiful again. Ever!
Never elect a gameshow host clown conman crimnal asshole. Just don't do it. Guess what.
We won't do this. You asked for it, you get it. Extreme wrath. Now choke and die.
 
PoliTalker said:
Hello deadcatbounce,



Nadler is correct. You have not shown that his view is based on feelings rather than knowledge. Nadler is in a position to have detailed information on the subject. His view is thus more valuable than yours or mine. He is better informed.

deadcatbounce, I have reviewed your brief posting history in order to gain some insight on making a decision of whether or not I want to talk to you. Immediately, I don't like your posting name nor your avatar, which reflect cruelty and lack of compassion. Secondly, I have noted that you have a weakness for ad hominems. I suspect we won't be talking long. If you treat me the way you have treated others you will be in violation of my PIP and go on my permanent Ignore List.

I am only talking to you initially on a probationary basis. If you can rise to a basic mutual respect with me and engage in truly civil discourse you may be able to move beyond probationary status with me. If you attack me in any way, and that is totally your prerogative, it will only be once. You will then be placed on Ignore and I will never respond to you again after that.

I do appreciate that you keep your speech clean. That is commendable. And I would be quite happy to dispute policy, ideas, events with you on any issue. Feel completely free to attack my ideas and posts. I welcome any sincere but respectful criticism. But the moment you begin talking about me? We will be done. From the looks of your posts you don't appear able to resist. Prove me wrong and we might have some interesting discussions. Otherwise I hope you go off on me quickly resulting in a minimal waste of time.

I have a lot of friends here on both sides of the isle. But I don't have any hard right friends. They all seem to be unable to move beyond name-calling, put-downs, stereotyping and blaming. None of which I am interested in. Such negativity. If you can rise above that I would be proud to add your name to my friend list. There's always hope. Maybe you're the one. The best case would be you prove me wrong on my initial impression. Good luck.
Click to expand...

You sound like whiny bitch. Please, do not bother wasting my time. Not only are you obviously arrogant for no reason, you seem to be lacking common sense and education. Good day.
 
Micawber said:
An eternal optomist...^^^LOL. Reminds me of Peter Sellers to George C Scott. "There is nothign to discuss, the man is obviously a psychotic"

He is a troll. That's what he is. Haters hate, trolls troll, ducks quack. He cannot meet your terms of service anymore than I can resist saying fuck you to Trumptards.
Click to expand...

Still drooling all over yourself.
 
deadcatbounce said:
https://edition.cnn.com/2019/09/16/politics/jerry-nadler-impeachment-remarks/index.html

This is why this impeachment exercise will back fire on Democrats. It is not about facts, it is about feelings and personal opinion. Nadler is an idiot. He should be removed from office.

"Nadler acknowledged that the House should not go forward with impeachment unless it has the public's support — not just because the public would view it as undemocratic and it would "tear the country apart," but also because the votes won't be there without public support."
Click to expand...

No shit? Nadler wants Mr. Trump impeached before he can take down the deep state criminals? I am enjoying the SHOW.....hell, they cannot even document just why our POTUS needs to be impeached...they just know he needs to be impeached because their corrupt empire is falling apart before their very eyes. Trump is dismantling the SWAMP one Lilly Pad at a time. First the over regulated non represented federal departments of fascism...like the EPA, Dept. of Education...etc., Then making the US energy independent (eliminating the need for perpetual warfare)…...placing over 150 new judges at the federal level to include placing conservatives on the 9th circuit (no legislation from the bench)….gaining control of SCOTUS. Taking on the Fed and the Central banks....and most important....INVESTIGATING THE INVERSTGATORS.

The left is in a state of panic....drip, drip, drip....the pain is being induced and turned up a little at a time...thus the BUM'S RUSH to remove Mr. Trump....but nothing is working.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top