Question for JPP Climate Enthusiasts

So that is your long-winded way of saying that >>

You have no training or expertise in atmospheric science.
You do not have a Ph.D in atmospheric science.
You do not conduct original research in climate science.
You have no peer reviewed publications in science journal.
At best, you have read some blog articles about climate.

That's all I needed to know. You do not have the training, expertise, or knowledge for me to put the slightest weight on anything you say about this topic. And therefore, a complete waste of my time to indulge your assertions, claims, and postulations.

Maybe I have a better grasp of basic science than you lol, but I find it very difficult to ‘not be skeptical’ of global warming based on what I *know* to be true.
 
So that is your long-winded way of saying that >>

You have no training or expertise in atmospheric science.
You do not have a Ph.D in atmospheric science.
You do not conduct original research in climate science.
You have no peer reviewed publications in science journal.
At best, you have read some blog articles about climate.

That's all I needed to know. You do not have the training, expertise, or knowledge for me to put the slightest weight on anything you say about this topic. And therefore, a complete waste of my time to indulge your assertions, claims, and postulations.

And since you also:

Have no training or expertise in atmospheric science.
Do not have a Ph.D in atmospheric science.
Do not conduct original research in climate science.
Have no peer reviewed publications in science journal.
And, at best, have read some blog articles about climate.

You should also stick go cyber-stalking your next female victim and STFU and STFD. :good4u:
 
Yes you can lol.

Blankets work for a reason: they *slow* the transfer of heat from a warm body to a cold body. Water vapor in the atmosphere slows the loss of heat from the warm body [earth] to the cold body [space] based on the same principle.

The reason daytime temps in the desert can reach a 100 degrees but fall drastically at night is because the air is so dry. But when it’s that hot in Atlanta during the day, the nights are miserable on account of the humidity [water vapor] in the air. It slows the transfer of heat to space.

You’re not conceding anything to the Climate Enthusiasts by allowing for the existence of Green House gases. Carbon dioxide just isn’t a climatologically important constituent of the atmosphere no matter how desperately they try and make it one. Carbon dioxide IS biologically important though: life couldn’t exist without it.


While I have a preference for terms/concepts the common man understands, technically, blankets slow convection currents.

And I'm guessing Into the Night prefers the technically correct terms "reflect" or "radiate" over "trap". He likes to be precise.
 
Last edited:
There are no climate enthusiasts. The future is grim with people like Trump in power and that does not create enthusiasm. It does give some people resolve to try and fix the problem before it fixes us.
 
Carbon dioxide just isn’t a climatologically important constituent of the atmosphere no matter how desperately they try and make it one. Carbon dioxide IS biologically important though: life couldn’t exist without it.

Correct; and the fact that urban development constitutes a mere 3% of the planet, the whole CO2 argument is lame and moronic.
 
There are no climate enthusiasts. The future is grim with people like Trump in power and that does not create enthusiasm. It does give some people resolve to try and fix the problem before it fixes us.

giphy.gif
 
No one said the earth is going to end in 12 years idiot!.

You are a boldface liar!

"The Doomsday Clock, the symbolic countdown to humanity’s end, remained stuck on the brink of the apocalypse for a second year on Tuesday, because of the continued existential threats posed by nuclear war and climate change.

The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, the group which created the clock in 1947, said it was keeping the clock hands set at three minutes to midnight – the closest the clock has come to destruction since the throes of the cold war in 1984."



You might as well kiss your sorry ass goodbye now, Hitler.

https://www.theguardian.com/environ...inutes-to-midnight-climate-change-nuclear-war
 
There are no climate enthusiasts. The future is grim with people like Trump in power and that does not create enthusiasm. It does give some people resolve to try and fix the problem before it fixes us.

You and yours should hang your heads in shame over the fact there are young people literally struggling with depression over this crap.
 
While I have a preference for terms/concepts the common man understands, technically, blankets slow convection currents.

And I'm guessing Into the Night prefers the technically correct terms "reflect" or "radiate" over "trap". He likes to be precise.

I admit to being stronger in biology than physics lol.

Finer points aside, are you and Into suggesting there’s no such things as a greenhouse gas?
 
"The Doomsday Clock, the symbolic countdown to humanity’s end, remained stuck on the brink of the apocalypse for a second year on Tuesday, because of the continued existential threats posed by nuclear war and climate change.

The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, the group which created the clock in 1947, said it was keeping the clock hands set at three minutes to midnight – the closest the clock has come to destruction since the throes of the cold war in 1984."



You might as well kiss your sorry ass goodbye now, Hitler.

https://www.theguardian.com/environ...inutes-to-midnight-climate-change-nuclear-war

Oh my God! No! Tell me you were not one of the idiots that filled his storm shelter with 100 bags of Cheetos and 20 cases of Dr. Pepper and expected the world to come to an end on New Years Eve Y2K.

I thought you were smarter than that Bigdog!

Jesus Christ son!
 
I admit to being stronger in biology than physics lol.

Finer points aside, are you and Into suggesting there’s no such things as a greenhouse gas?

No, I am not.

I can't speak for him on that.
 
Last edited:
Oh my God! No! Tell me you were not one of the idiots that filled his storm shelter with 100 bags of Cheetos and 20 cases of D., Pepper and expected the world to come to an end on New Years Eve Y2K.

I thought you were smarter than that Bigdog!

Jesus Christ son!

Hahaha ... AOC really did say 12 years ... and then Beto had to one-up her and said 10 years. These two are the top tier of liberal intelligentsia. :palm:
 
Hahaha ... AOC really did say 12 years ... and then Beto had to one-up her and said 10 years. These two are the top tier of liberal intelligentsia. :palm:

If they truly said that then they are stupid and careless for saying it.

I bet they were taken out of context though, by the sources that were quoted.

What I have heard some candidates say is we better start making changes now, because in 12 years or so, it may be too late to turn things back!
 
Back
Top