Are violent depictions against a Republican President okay with all liberals?

[domer76]

Yet you ignore 40,000 auto deaths a year. And 70,000 drug overdose deaths a year. SCOTUS has basically ignored the 2nd for the last 200+ years. You are obsessed with gun deaths, as if that's the only way to really die. Your reference to "modern cultures" is yet another admission that factors other than gun control laws are of primary importance.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

For the zillionth time, autos are necessary in a modern society. Other modern societies do very well without being saturated in guns. A false equivalency.

Obsessed with gun deaths? Hardly. Just pointing out the reality. Have you been around many gun deaths? Probably not. You should get up close and personal with a few before you spout off from ignorance.

Modern society, pal, means countries other than Honduras, El Salvadore, Zambia or other third world countries.

I thought that was clear to everyone. Obviously not.

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

It's amusing how some are always so deluded about the past. They just have the good old days skipping like a record in their heads, or something. I've seen Republicans complain about stuff like crazy, and ignore their past, or present. Republicans are a screwy brand, that more times then not don't seem to carry a proper standard anymore. It's more just what they feel at the time. Well that's the nice way of thinking. It just seems they have set standards for everyone, but themselves.

At the time, when these things about Obama were happening, we'd see Righties cry "Well, *some* ppl are racists but most of us aren't like that!" and want us to believe that. Forward a few years and suddenly *all* lefties are "violent" Antifa members.

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

Yet you ignore 40,000 auto deaths a year.

Wrong. Vehicles have gotten safer and safer over the years, due to -- wait for it -- regulations demanding it.

And 70,000 drug overdose deaths a year.

Who is ignoring that? Certainly not society, law enforcement, the medical community, etc. Even the WH resident has mentioned the opioid epidemic.

SCOTUS has basically ignored the 2nd for the last 200+ years. You are obsessed with gun deaths, as if that's the only way to really die. Your reference to "modern cultures" is yet another admission that factors other than gun control laws are of primary importance.

Preventable deaths should be prevented. Joe Six-Pack's right to own an arsenal that isn't secured does not trump *my* right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

 

[Celticguy]

Am I the only one that has noticed that liberals are very violent people?

After 8 years of Obama's racist policies, Trump has been a champion on bringing blacks to the table of acceptance.

Let's not let all of this effort go to wait by electing another racist Democrat.

Blacks, women, hispanics and everyone else BECAUSE he didnt play favorites or hamper anyone. Reminds me of a dream a black pastor once spoke of.

 

[Guno צְבִי]

Am I the only one that has noticed that liberals are very violent people?

After 8 years of Obama's racist policies, Trump has been a champion on bringing blacks to the table of acceptance.

Let's not let all of this effort go to wait by electing another racist Democrat.

Yea, that's why white christ-stained terrorists are the greatest danger to America today, because of libs

 

[Guno צְבִי]

Blacks, women, hispanics and everyone else BECAUSE he didnt play favorites or hamper anyone. Reminds me of a dream a black pastor once spoke of.

white trash goyim will get treated as they treated minorities

 

[rjhenn]

We had assault weapons banned through most of the Clinton years. So I don't even have crocodile tears worth giving to the crazies, that say doing that is infringement.

And that ban accomplished absolutely nothing, like every other gun control law ever.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[rjhenn]

Wrong. Vehicles have gotten safer and safer over the years, due to -- wait for it -- regulations demanding it.



Who is ignoring that? Certainly not society, law enforcement, the medical community, etc. Even the WH resident has mentioned the opioid epidemic.



Preventable deaths should be prevented. Joe Six-Pack's right to own an arsenal that isn't secured does not trump *my* right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Gun control laws are based on the presumption that you don't have a right to life.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[rjhenn]

For the zillionth time, autos are necessary in a modern society. Other modern societies do very well without being saturated in guns. A false equivalency.

Obsessed with gun deaths? [emoji38]up: Hardly. Just pointing out the reality. Have you been around many gun deaths? Probably not. You should get up close and personal with a few before you spout off from ignorance.

Modern society, pal, means countries other than Honduras, El Salvadore, Zambia or other third world countries.

I thought that was clear to everyone. Obviously not.

The usual delusions. The only measure that you can contemplate is abolition. Yes, you are obsessed with gun deaths. Your experience with them has driven you insane. What third world countries tell us is that gun control laws are ineffectual. What first world countries tell us is that gun control laws only 'work' if there was no need for them in the first place. Factors other than gun control laws have far more influence, something you continue to ignore in your wishful thinking. We would be far better off putting gun safety education in all public schools. Knowledge is superior to ignorance, but knowledge is anathema to the control freaks.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[rjhenn]

Am I the only one that has noticed that liberals are very violent people?

After 8 years of Obama's racist policies, Trump has been a champion on bringing blacks to the table of acceptance.

Let's not let all of this effort go to wait by electing another racist Democrat.

The usual delusions about Obama and Trump. Clearly suffering from both ODS and TDS.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[rjhenn]

Again. I read and understand quite well.
As I've said, that asshole has been pissing himself for years.
Now can you understand that?

It's clear that you have trouble understanding plain English.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[StoneByStone]

Gun control laws are based on the presumption that you don't have a right to life.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

It's actually on the presumption that you do have a right to life and should be protected from people who want to take that right away.

 

[RB 60]

It's clear that you have trouble understanding plain English.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Uh, no.

 

[Jade Dragon]

And that ban accomplished absolutely nothing, like every other gun control law ever.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

School shootings were unheard of up until Columbine. Then they didn't happen for a good while again. They refused to reinstate gun laws, and now school shootings are dime a dozen. I'm literally barely effected by them. I hear there's a school shooting and just shrug. Well who would have thought?

 

[RB 60]

Preventable deaths should be prevented. Joe Six-Pack's right to own an arsenal that isn't secured does not trump *my* right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Of course preventable deaths should be prevented. Infringing on my constitutional right isn't the way to do it. Try education, it worked for my, and previous generations.

Haven't you claimed to own, in your own words, a "lil arsenal" some time back? Didn't you also say you "shot up" a case of pineapples because you're allergic to them (not the best target or reason to shoot pineapples in the first place)?

As much as I think shooting pineapples is irresponsible, it does not affect *my* right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

Gun control laws are based on the presumption that you don't have a right to life.

That statement has no meaning. Did you mean to say "the lack of gun control laws"?

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

Of course preventable deaths should be prevented. Infringing on my constitutional right isn't the way to do it. Try education, it worked for my, and previous generations.

Re-read my statement, please. Notice that I qualified the arsenal with "not secured." In other words, Joe Six-Pack's weapons are not locked up and easily available to his disturbed teenage son, any burglar who happens to break in, or his wife who just found out that he's been boinking her sisters. Don't you agree that it is reasonable to require that firearms be kept locked up or otherwise secured when not being used, for the safety of the rest of the community?

 

[domer76]

The usual delusions. The only measure that you can contemplate is abolition. Yes, you are obsessed with gun deaths. Your experience with them has driven you insane. What third world countries tell us is that gun control laws are ineffectual. What first world countries tell us is that gun control laws only 'work' if there was no need for them in the first place. Factors other than gun control laws have far more influence, something you continue to ignore in your wishful thinking. We would be far better off putting gun safety education in all public schools. Knowledge is superior to ignorance, but knowledge is anathema to the control freaks.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Sorry, I can’t fix your willful ignorance on this one.

Thanks for admitting, though, your lack of personal experience with gun violence.

 

[domer76]

Gun control laws are based on the presumption that you don't have a right to life.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

People in Japan, UK, Australia, etc. don’t have a right to life?

 

[domer76]

Of course preventable deaths should be prevented. Infringing on my constitutional right isn't the way to do it. Try education, it worked for my, and previous generations.

Haven't you claimed to own, in your own words, a "lil arsenal" some time back? Didn't you also say you "shot up" a case of pineapples because you're allergic to them (not the best target or reason to shoot pineapples in the first place)?

As much as I think shooting pineapples is irresponsible, it does not affect *my* right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

The “right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness”?

In the Declaration, not the Bill of Rights, those were lies before the ink was dry.