Liberals threaten to kill little girl known as ''mini AOC''

https://www.foxnews.com/entertainme...-receiving-death-threats-harassment-from-left

Alec Baldwin can appear on network television every week and make fun of President Trump. No problem.
An 8 year old girl appears on the internet making fun of AOC and liberals have silenced her, by threatening to kill her.

You liberals are so tolerant. If you can't kill them in the womb, kill them any other way you can.

You conservatives are so misguided. Ask yourself why a parent would exploit their child this way and leave them open to the hell hole of anonymous Youtube comments.
 
'MINI AOC' TWITTER ACCOUNT PULLED AFTER FAMILY CLAIMS TO RECEIVE DEATH THREATS OVER PHOTOS MOCKING ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ

https://www.newsweek.com/mini-aoc-twitter-pulled-mocking-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-1447506


So yes its a-ok for everyone under the sun to mock Trump who is a public figure...but AOC a public figure its not funny and the 8 yo must be killed!

From your link: "While Schacter did not explicitly say what contents the messages contained, he said they were "increasingly personal, dark and dangerous."

Why wouldn't he explicitly say?
 
You conservatives are so misguided. Ask yourself why a parent would exploit their child this way and leave them open to the hell hole of anonymous Youtube comments.

Blame the victim!!

But u have no problem with a parent dressing a 7 year old boy as a girl ...and leave them open to verbal abuse etc!
 
From your link: "While Schacter did not explicitly say what contents the messages contained, he said they were "increasingly personal, dark and dangerous."

Why wouldn't he explicitly say?

Uh, possibly because they were...wait for it... explicit?
 
From your link: "While Schacter did not explicitly say what contents the messages contained, he said they were "increasingly personal, dark and dangerous."

Why wouldn't he explicitly say?

Did u ask the same with the Ford threats? They did explicitly say what contents the death threats contained or said!

Why wouldn't they explicitly say?...IDIOT
 
Blame the victim!!

But u have no problem with a parent dressing a 7 year old boy as a girl ...and leave them open to verbal abuse etc!

I'm not blaming the victim, dummy. I'm blaming the victim's parents. Can't you read?

Your second sentence makes no sense. Post my comment so I can see what you're talking about.
 
Did u ask the same with the Ford threats? They did explicitly say what contents the death threats contained or said!

Why wouldn't thee explicitly say?...IDIOT

Go back and read my comments on the Ford threats. People posted her personal info on the internet, where was your outrage then?

“I have been called the most vile and hateful names imaginable,” she said in her Senate testimony. People have posted my personal information on the Internet. This has resulted in additional emails, calls, and threats. My family and I were forced to move out of our home. ... My family and I have been living in various secure locales, with guards."

One of the messages reportedly said that Ford had “6 months to live, you disgusting slime.”
 
Go back and read my comments on the Ford threats. People posted her personal info on the internet, where was your outrage then?

“I have been called the most vile and hateful names imaginable,” she said in her Senate testimony. People have posted my personal information on the Internet. This has resulted in additional emails, calls, and threats. My family and I were forced to move out of our home. ... My family and I have been living in various secure locales, with guards."

One of the messages reportedly said that Ford had “6 months to live, you disgusting slime.”

People (Spike Lee) posted Zimmerman personal info on the internet, where was your outrage then?

Elderly Couple Flees Home, Hires Lawyer After Spike Lee Retweets Wrong Zimmerman Address


Link to your outrage
 
Last edited:
Go back and read my comments on the Ford threats. People posted her personal info on the internet, where was your outrage then?

“I have been called the most vile and hateful names imaginable,” she said in her Senate testimony. People have posted my personal information on the Internet. This has resulted in additional emails, calls, and threats. My family and I were forced to move out of our home. ... My family and I have been living in various secure locales, with guards."

One of the messages reportedly said that Ford had “6 months to live, you disgusting slime.”

According to Democrats all that information was going to be protected by the committee. She was promised anonymity backed up the word of the Democrats. Everyone should know by now you cannot trust a Democrat.
 
Go back and read my comments on the Ford threats. People posted her personal info on the internet, where was your outrage then?

“I have been called the most vile and hateful names imaginable,” she said in her Senate testimony. People have posted my personal information on the Internet. This has resulted in additional emails, calls, and threats. My family and I were forced to move out of our home. ... My family and I have been living in various secure locales, with guards."

One of the messages reportedly said that Ford had “6 months to live, you disgusting slime.”

New York Times responds to criticism about Darren Wilson’s address

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...address/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.a91a7c605c4f

Where was your outrage then?
 
According to Democrats all that information was going to be protected by the committee. She was promised anonymity backed up the word of the Democrats. Everyone should know by now you cannot trust a Democrat.

:rolleyes: Anyone with a computer could google her name, credentials and address from the internet. What were Democrats supposed to do, close down the internet until her info was scrubbed?
 
People (Spike Lee) posted Zimmerman personal info on the internet, where was your outrage then?

Elderly Couple Flees Home, Hires Lawyer After Spike Lee Retweets Wrong Zimmerman Address

Link to your outrage

What's the difference between someone being investigated for a crime and someone giving testimony before a committee, hotshot?

I don't know what it's like where you live but when someone is accused of a crime here, their details are made public.
 
:rolleyes: Anyone with a computer could google her name, credentials and address from the internet. What were Democrats supposed to do, close down the internet until her info was scrubbed?

Those were leaked. By Democrats. The only reason she agreed to come forward was under the condition of complete anonymity, which was promised by Feinstein and the Democrat Committee. Obviously that information became public thanks to the Democrats she trusted.
 
Those were leaked. By Democrats. The only reason she agreed to come forward was under the condition of complete anonymity, which was promised by Feinstein and the Democrat Committee. Obviously that information became public thanks to the Democrats she trusted.

I know you hate Democrats but this doesn't even make sense. She wasn't testifying anonymously. There was no way she could testify under her real name and not be found on the internet. And you haven't even considered the fact that O'Kavanaugh's supporters could have leaked her info.
 
I know you hate Democrats but this doesn't even make sense. She wasn't testifying anonymously. There was no way she could testify under her real name and not be found on the internet. And you haven't even considered the fact that O'Kavanaugh's supporters could have leaked her info.

Look it up. It was all over the news. That is the reason she almost did not testify at all. Democrats fed her to the wolves for perceived political gain.
 
Back
Top