No, they dont. Nature of government.
"Sanders is right: Republican tax cuts cost more than forgiving student debt"
- Thread starter archives
- Start date
No, they dont. Nature of government.
Isn't it funny how Dems can't add or subtract? Look no further than the cities they run, and they want to be president?
Close the border.
Yes...and to forgive their debt so they can spend in the economy instead of paying usury to debt-holders.
That's how you stimulate an economy.
countryboy
Verified User
Lol, you realize it's 2019, right? It's true that corporate Revenue took a slight dip in 2018, as Illustrated in the numbers you just posted, but it has rebounded, and we are at record Revenue levels. Nice try.
In other words, reward those that promised to do something because now they don't like having to live up to their word.
cawacko
Well-known member
We as voters don't demand it though. Let's face it, regardless of one's politics most don't support changes to entitlement programs.
It's like a typical freeloader agreeing to pay back a student loan then whining when it comes time to do what he/she said. No surprise you support them backing out. Irresponsibility is you all day long.
I support getting rid of them. They serve no purpose. They create freeloaders that think something is owed to them.
You could attain changes to entitlement programs, it has been done before, but in the current political environment, it ain't going happen, and Trump shares the blame for a lot of that
So far, your tax cuts have expanded the deficit by 25% this year, after expanding it 39% last year.
No we aren't. Show your work.
No it wouldn't be cheaper. Encouraging someone to be irresponsible has a much higher price tag. If you enable it and encourage it, it's never ending.
countryboy
Verified User
Spending is expanding the deficit, not record increased revenues. Look it up dumbass, it ain't my job to educate your stupid ass.
cawacko
Well-known member
Archives, you're suffering from serious TDS my man. The world and all of these issues existed prior to 2016. We didn't run up 22 trillion in debt (or whatever the number is now) in two years. Hell just go back a decade to Paul Ryan and his proposed changes to entitlement programs and the ads that following showing Republicans pushing Grandma off a cliff. Go back to W's proposed changes to S.S. in 2005/2006. There have been bi-partisan commissions discussing this and they've put out recommendations but nothing has been done.
Voters don't want entitlement programs touched no matter how much they complain about government spending.
No, fiscal terrorism is.
You deliberately fly planes of tax cuts into the budget, resulting in massive deficits that you fake concern over and use as an excuse to exact punitive harm on those you sanctimoniously judge by cutting spending on programs to which you are ideologically opposed, but lack the courage, support, and will to repeal through conventional legislation.
So you deliberately create a problem in order to advance your unpopular agenda.
You're a fiscal terrorist.
Conservatives deliberately create deficits with their tax cuts and then cry fake tears over the resulting deficits and posture that to bring those under control, we have to cut the spending to which they're already ideologically opposed.
So you deliberately wreck the budget to advance your unpopular agenda.
That's terrorism, and you're on record supporting it.
You won't show your work because you didn't do the work.
Be honest; you're just a lazy slob.