2nd AMEMDMENT:Fearing Her Husband, She Took His Guns To Police. They Arrested Her.

[gfm7175]

He was violating a court order and a convicted abuser.

Not a jury in the world that will convict her. If it even gets that far.

Got that cock out of your rectum yet, groaner?

If the testimony were accurate, I sure as hell would convict her for thievery.

 

[gfm7175]

I seriously doubt that she’ll ever be charged by the prosecutor.

Self defense all the way.

There’s also the lack of criminal intent.

Theft IS a crime. That IS criminal intent.

 

[gfm7175]

Yes. He's always believed that.

They both should be in jail. her for theft, him for assault.

Precisely this. If the story is accurate, then they both committed crimes and they both should be thrown in jail for those crimes.

 

[gfm7175]

Since dumbass domer thinks it's ok for this woman to take the law into her own hands to enforce a court order about her husband not having guns...

I wonder if he thinks US citizens should be able to round up and remove illegals who have court orders for deportation.

Good question. I have a hunch that he won't be okay with that example of yours, but I'll let him speak for himself.

 

[RB 60]

Reasonable action is.

He was charged with aggravated battery with a deadly weapon, stupid fuck. In addition to domestic abuse.

Yeah, dumbfuck, he IS part of the discussion. Without him and his abusive and life threatening actions, her response doesn’t happen.

I can’t fix your massive stupidity, idiot.

Her action was unreasonable. Breaking and entering and theft is against the law, simple as that.

Who cares what he was charged with. Innocent until proven guilty. If the charges warranted him giving up his weapons, the court would have said so at his arraignment.

No dickhead, he had nothing to do with her breaking the law, simple as that.

Your massive ignorance is beyond fixing. You will always remain stupid.

 

[domer76]

Her action was unreasonable. Breaking and entering and theft is against the law, simple as that.

Who cares what he was charged with. Innocent until proven guilty. If the charges warranted him giving up his weapons, the court would have said so at his arraignment.

No dickhead, he had nothing to do with her breaking the law, simple as that.

Your massive ignorance is beyond fixing. You will always remain stupid.

Sure as shit wasn’t unreasonable. Being proactive to protect you and your family from imminent danger? VERY reasonable. It’s called self defense.

Who cares what he was charged with? lol. What a fucking idiot! He had restraining orders you fucking moron. And two felony arrests sufficient for the judge to deny him access to firearms

How did she break the law? I thought you just said innocent until proven guilty. Stupid fuck.

Wanna bet who goes to jail and who doesn’t, shitstain?

What a fucking ignorant moron.

 

[Sirthinksalot]

Since dumbass domer thinks it's ok for this woman to take the law into her own hands to enforce a court order about her husband not having guns...

I wonder if he thinks US citizens should be able to round up and remove illegals who have court orders for deportation.

What do you say, pally boy?

 

[Into the Night]

Sure as shit wasn’t unreasonable.

Yes it was.

Being proactive to protect you and your family from imminent danger? VERY reasonable. It’s called self defense.

You call this self defense? Okay. I'll shoot you because you MIGHT go out and buy a gun and shoot me. Self defense.

Who cares what he was charged with? lol. What a fucking idiot! He had restraining orders you fucking moron. And two felony arrests sufficient for the judge to deny him access to firearms

Bu they didn't.

How did she break the law? I thought you just said innocent until proven guilty. Stupid fuck.

Did you know that theft is against the law?

Wanna bet who goes to jail and who doesn’t, shitstain?

They could very well BOTH go to jail. They can finish up their divorce proceedings from there.

What a fucking ignorant moron.

Oooh. You are showing anger. I had better shoot you again. Self defense!

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Sure as shit wasn’t unreasonable. Being proactive to protect you and your family from imminent danger? VERY reasonable. It’s called self defense.

Who cares what he was charged with? lol. What a fucking idiot! He had restraining orders you fucking moron. And two felony arrests sufficient for the judge to deny him access to firearms

How did she break the law? I thought you just said innocent until proven guilty. Stupid fuck.

Wanna bet who goes to jail and who doesn’t, shitstain?

What a fucking ignorant moron.

She ADMITTED TO BREAKING AND ENTERING AND THEFT.

Why was she jailed for 6 days and him for 1 DAY??

 

[RB 60]

Sure as shit wasn’t unreasonable. Being proactive to protect you and your family from imminent danger? VERY reasonable. It’s called self defense.

Who cares what he was charged with? lol. What a fucking idiot! He had restraining orders you fucking moron. And two felony arrests sufficient for the judge to deny him access to firearms

How did she break the law? I thought you just said innocent until proven guilty. Stupid fuck.

Wanna bet who goes to jail and who doesn’t, shitstain?

What a fucking ignorant moron.

Grow up, dickhead. If the authorities wanted his firearms, they'd go get them themselves, or he'd have to prove he no longer possesses them.

She was charged with those crimes and she'll be tried for them (unless she pleads them out).

How? She broke into his house, you pathetic reject.

I hope she gets 5 yrs. for her crime.

How about I break into your house and take your computer because I'm "offended" cause you're a stupid incoherent insulting asshole? You know, the same as those snowflakes at G.W. HS.?

Kill yourself.

 

[gfm7175]

Sure as shit wasn’t unreasonable.

Yes, it was. Theft is not reasonable. Theft is a crime.

Being proactive to protect you and your family from imminent danger? VERY reasonable. It’s called self defense.

Being proactive is one thing, self defense is one thing... Theft is another thing.

Who cares what he was charged with? lol. What a fucking idiot! He had restraining orders you fucking moron. And two felony arrests sufficient for the judge to deny him access to firearms

Your anger is coming out in full force again.

How did she break the law?

Theft is a crime.

I thought you just said innocent until proven guilty. Stupid fuck.

More insults.

Wanna bet who goes to jail and who doesn’t, shitstain?

More insults. And they both very well could end up in jail. If the accounts are accurate, they both committed crimes, after all...

What a fucking ignorant moron.

More insults. Obviously you still haven't gotten a grip on your anger issues. Why are you so angry all the time? I most definitely would not want to be this angry...

 

[domer76]

Grow up, dickhead. If the authorities wanted his firearms, they'd go get them themselves, or he'd have to prove he no longer possesses them.

She was charged with those crimes and she'll be tried for them (unless she pleads them out).

How? She broke into his house, you pathetic reject.

I hope she gets 5 yrs. for her crime.

How about I break into your house and take your computer because I'm "offended" cause you're a stupid incoherent insulting asshole? You know, the same as those snowflakes at G.W. HS.?

Kill yourself.

Just like the rest of you ignorant cocksuckers, offering an irrelevant and absurd analogy. She wasn’t “offended”, cunt. She perceived imminent danger for her life and her family’s life. What a laughable and lame comparison.

Pathetic fucking moron.

 

[domer76]

What do you say, pally boy?

Self defense, cunt. 100%. She merely did not have to use force.

Prove criminal intent, cunt.

 

[christiefan915]

Alleged: Declared but not proven. Why read any more than the first 2 words of this article when you know the rest is nothing but conjecture, opinion and BULLSHIT?

FYI: Stealing is still stealing regardless of any attempt to justify that theft. This "female" was not protected via a marriage vow after she engaged in the process of divorce. The law must treat her as any other citizen. No citizen has the right to self declare "vigilante" justice. She was not a representative of the court nor any law enforcement agency. Regardless of any court order or conditions established via the court.....when she confessed to going TO THE RESIDENCE OF HER HUSBAND (estranged by that time)….and taking private property, SHE COMMITTED A CRIME.

Anyone can see why this marriage did not work out.....and I am of the opinion that it had nothing to do with spousal abuse.

It's people like you who show why victims of domestic abuse often don't report it.

Irby abused his wife and tried to kill or hurt her in her car; he's also had more than one protective order against him. Mrs. Irby's crime was taking two guns to the police station without getting his permission.

He gets freed after an overnight stay in jail; she gets five nights and six days in the slammer. The system sucks and so do the men of the Lakeland police force. I sure hope we don't read that she was a homicide victim after the husband got access to his guns again.

 

[christiefan915]

She has crazy-eyes. I don't trust her.

If she were wearing a MAGA hat you''d love her eyes.

 

[Gonzomin]

Good question. I have a hunch that he won't be okay with that example of yours, but I'll let him speak for himself.

When you are the one threatened, you tend to take it personally. The guns are a direct threat to her. If she can get his illegal guns taken away, she wins.

 

[domer76]

Since dumbass domer thinks it's ok for this woman to take the law into her own hands to enforce a court order about her husband not having guns...

I wonder if he thinks US citizens should be able to round up and remove illegals who have court orders for deportation.

It’s just fucking hilarious watching you stupid fucks grasping for some sort of analogy and failing miserably at it.

Based on his past history of domestic abuse, aggravated battery with a deadly weapon and violation of protective orders, she reasonably perceived an imminent threat to her life and her family’s life. Self defense. No criminal intent.

I will love to hear her testimony in any trial that she may face, which is highly doubtful. When she describes the incidents of abuse and the fear it instilled, when she describes her car being rammed by him and the fear it instilled, when she describes the violation of protection orders and the fear it instilled, there is no jury in the world that will convict her for being proactive to protect her life and her family’s lives.

I will love to hear that same testimony at his trials. He’s fucking toast. Best for him to cop a plea.

Her fate? Not guilty and freedom.
His fate? Guilty and in jail.

Bet on it bitch.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

It's people like you who show why victims of domestic abuse often don't report it.

Irby abused his wife and tried to kill or hurt her in her car; he's also had more than one protective order against him. Mrs. Irby's crime was taking two guns to the police station without getting his permission.

He gets freed after an overnight stay in jail; she gets five nights and six days in the slammer. The system sucks and so do the men of the Lakeland police force. I sure hope we don't read that she was a homicide victim after the husband got access to his guns again.

Now you're just flat out lying; because her crime was breaking and entering, plus theft and probably a few more charges.

They both deserve jail time.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

It’s just fucking hilarious watching you stupid fucks grasping for some sort of analogy and failing miserably at it.

Based on his past history of domestic abuse, aggravated battery with a deadly weapon and violation of protective orders, she reasonably perceived an imminent threat to her life and her family’s life. Self defense. No criminal intent.

I will love to hear her testimony in any trial that she may face, which is highly doubtful. When she describes the incidents of abuse and the fear it instilled, when she describes her car being rammed by him and the fear it instilled, when she describes the violation of protection orders and the fear it instilled, there is no jury in the world that will convict her for being proactive to protect her life and her family’s lives.

I will love to hear that same testimony at his trials. He’s fucking toast. Best for him to cop a plea.

Her fate? Not guilty and freedom.
His fate? Guilty and in jail.

Bet on it bitch.

How was he an "imminent threat", when he was in jail at the time of her break in and theft??

 

[Sirthinksalot]

Self defense, cunt. 100%. She merely did not have to use force.

Prove criminal intent, cunt.

That wasn't even a good deflection, you laughable cunt. You claimed she was justified in burglarizing her estranged husband's home and stealing his property because there was a court order that he not possess said property. If people are entitled to take the law into their own hands because a court order has been issued, should citizens be empowered to detain and remove illegal aliens who are subject to court orders of deportation? It's a straightforward question and a perfectly relevant analogy, pally boy. I don't expect you to answer of course. Pussy.