Drumbeat, drumbeat...BOLTON WANTS WAR with IRAN, TRUMP NEEDS A WAR (ANY)

The "folks" (the fcktards) who fell for the WMD lies will believe any lie, no matter how blatant, to start a war against perceived Semites who don't hate Jesus.

Democrat quotes on WMDs

Saddam Hussein has spent the better part of this decade and much of his nation's wealth not on providing for the Iraqi people but on developing nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them."
-- President Bill Clinton (State of the Union Address), Jan. 27, 1998

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"No one has done what Saddam Hussein has done, or is thinking of doing. He is producing weapons of mass destruction, and he is qualitatively and quantitatively different from other dictators.""Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

"I mean, we have three different countries that, while they all present serious problems for the United States -- they're dictatorships, they're involved in the development and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction -- you know, the most imminent, clear and present threat to our country is not the same from those three countries. I think Iraq is the most serious and imminent threat to our country."
-- Sen. John Edwards (D, NC) Feb. 24, 2002

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power. We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." "
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein's regime is a serious danger, that he is a tyrant, and that his pursuit of lethal weapons of mass destruction cannot be tolerated. He must be disarmed. We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Edward Kennedy (D, MA) Sep. 27, 2002

"Now let me be clear -- I suffer no illusions about Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal man. A ruthless man. A man who butchers his own people to secure his own power. He has repeatedly defied UN resolutions, thwarted UN inspection teams, developed chemical and biological weapons, and coveted nuclear capacity. He's a bad guy. The world, and the Iraqi people, would be better off without him."
-- State Senator Barack Obama (Democrat, Illinois) Oct. 2, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"My position is very clear: The time has come for decisive action to eliminate the threat posed by Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction."
-- Senator John Edwards (D, NC), Oct. 7, 2002

"We stopped the fighting [in 1991] on an agreement that Iraq would take steps to assure the world that it would not engage in further aggression and that it would destroy its weapons of mass destruction. It has refused to take those steps. That refusal constitutes a breach of the armistice which renders it void and justifies resumption of the armed conflict."
-- Sen. Harry Reid (D. NV) Oct. 9, 2002


"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"I come to this debate, Mr. Speaker, as one at the end of 10 years in office on the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, where stopping the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction was one of my top priorities. I applaud the President on focusing on this issue and on taking the lead to disarm Saddam Hussein. ... Others have talked about this threat that is posed by Saddam Hussein. Yes, he has chemical weapons, he has biological weapons, he is trying to get nuclear weapons."
-- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D. CA) Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

"People can quarrel with whether we should have more troops in Afghanistan or internationalize Iraq or whatever, but it is incontestable that on the day I left office, there were unaccounted for stocks of biological and chemical weapons."
-- Ex President Bill Clinton, Jul. 22, 2003 (Interview with CNN Larry King)

I asked very direct questions of the top people in the CIA and people who'd served in the Clinton administration. And they said they believed that Saddam Hussein either had weapons or had the components of weapons or the ability to quickly make weapons of mass destruction. What we're worried about is an A-bomb in a Ryder truck in New York, in Washington and St. Louis. It cannot happen. We have to prevent it from happening.
-- Rep. Richard Gephardt (D, MT) Nov. 2, 2003
 
Hey fcktard, why is it okay for "brave" US to commit war crimes all across the middle east, but not okay for Iran to maybe fund some resistance fighters in their own backyard? And, what's so brave about the US, with more military spending than most of the world's countries put together, picking on some sand negroes?

Hey, America hating moron on steroids; why do you pretend that tyrants, despots, dictators and terrorists aren't the problem? Answer: Because you are a brain dead, repugnant and clueless moron on steroids.
 
Could John Bolton soon be SACKED? Will it avert Iran war? Former CIA agent Kiriakou positive on both

5d040a3cfc7e93e1688b45e6.png


Hawkish National Security Advisor John Bolton has steered the Trump administration towards multiple conflicts. However, CIA whistleblower John Kiriakou tells RT he’s learned that Bolton’s days in the White House may be numbered.
Since joining the Trump administration in April of last year, Bolton has taken the hardest line possible on every geopolitical flare-up. From advocating “humanitarian intervention” in Venezuela, to briefing journalists about a plan to deploy 100,000 troops to the Middle East, to rumors of him “sabotaging” Trump’s summit with North Korea’s Kim Jong-un last year, Bolton has trumpeted escalation and confrontation as a panacea to all of America’s foreign policy ills.

https://www.rt.com/news/461907-trump-fire-bolton-iran-kiriakou/


Bye, bye, Bolton, bye,bye.
 
Here's a list of people who fell for WMD, are they all morons?

Democrat quotes on WMDs

Saddam Hussein has spent the better part of this decade and much of his nation's wealth not on providing for the Iraqi people but on developing nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them."
-- President Bill Clinton (State of the Union Address), Jan. 27, 1998



1998 quote for a 2003 invasion? You're a fcking moron. In fact, you're a total moron if you think quoting Democrat liars will convince anyone of anything other than you're a moron for believing them.
 
Bolton loves to work with Putin just like Flynn and Trump

the Russians probably attacked those tankers, false flag op for the upcoming war with Iran
 
Anerican hostages...Iran...Carter

The overthrow of democratically elected government (Mossadeq) in 1953 and installing a horrible dictator who gave us their oil. The Peacock Throne ruled viciously for a couple of decades. Then came the student riots that threw him and American's out. Did you forget that?
 
Of course not. They do not have the skill and are to cowardly. They do however fund other terrorist states to do it for them. Dumb fuck.

Nope. They do have proxy wars with the Saudis who are as aggressive as the US. 15 of the 911 highjackers were Saudis and we completely ignored that.The PNAC neocons had plans for beating 7 countries in 5 years. We attacked Iraq starting this mess and the terrorism results from our aggression. Is this when I call you a name? Do you think that is winning and good argument?
 
The US has a long modern history of bullying and harrassing Iran. Yes, Bolton, and other neocon bigots, want war with Iran. Not just Iran, these same assholes want war with any semitic nation that doesn't hate Jesus.

You know, I've always rejected the JESUS angle, whether it was those who were never going to or the suddenly favored JEWS who get a pass because they would HAVE TO come to believe. I think is all BULLSHIT. I always think oil oil oil. But, these fucking RW religious freaks might just figure they'll DELIVER Jesus to the brown hordes and their prize, while they're waiting to get to HEAVEN, will be cheap gas.
 
Last edited:
The overthrow of democratically elected government (Mossadeq) in 1953 and installing a horrible dictator who gave us their oil. The Peacock Throne ruled viciously for a couple of decades. Then came the student riots that threw him and American's out. Did you forget that?

He was hopelessly naive and principled for that time, to have survived meant being far more authoritarian.
 
Nope. They do have proxy wars with the Saudis who are as aggressive as the US. 15 of the 911 highjackers were Saudis and we completely ignored that.The PNAC neocons had plans for beating 7 countries in 5 years. We attacked Iraq starting this mess and the terrorism results from our aggression. Is this when I call you a name? Do you think that is winning and good argument?

Oh- he loves calling names- as long as he has his anonymity.
 
You know, I've always rejected the JESUS angle, whether it was those who were never going to or the suddenly favored JEWS who get a pass because they would HAVE TO come to believe. I think is all BULLSHIT. I always think oil oil oil. But, these fucking RW religious freaks might just figure they'll DELIVER Jesus to the brown hordes and their prize, while they're waiting to get to HEAVEN, will be cheap gas.

What planet are you on? The "RW religious freaks" have no interest in delivering Jesus to anyone. The religion-inspired US middle-east policies that they militantly support has been killing Christians in large numbers and making Christianity look repulsive in the middle-east. Those freaks serve Israel, which hates Jesus.
 
Back
Top