Fox News says Mueller report did NOT clear Trump

Yurt said:
So now Democrats believe Fox is a truthful news source....

:rofl2:
Click to expand...

Stupid conclusion, even for you. Fox telling the truth about Trump and the Mueller report is news. It is discussion worthy. The fact that they lie and are Fake News makes it a bigger story. But that does not mean Fox isn't all right all the time. They just cannot pretend about what the Mueller report is. Too many people have read it or discussed it.
 
Superfreak said:
If they couldn't reach a conclusion on Trump. Why did they investigate?
Click to expand...

You really don't know? Mueller was charged with investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election. The first half of the report itemizes what they did and it was bigly. Mueller was also supposed to investigate crimes that rose out of the Russian investigation. That is where the 6 Trumpies were charged and another 30 indictments written.
Mueller said in simple English that he operated the investigation with the FBI concept that a sitting president cannot be indicted. However, he did list about 10 incidents of obstruction that the House could go after because they do not operate under those restraints.
 
Gonzomin said:
You really don't know? Mueller was charged with investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election. The first half of the report itemizes what they did and it was bigly. Mueller was also supposed to investigate crimes that rose out of the Russian investigation. That is where the 6 Trumpies were charged and another 30 indictments written.
Mueller said in simple English that he operated the investigation with the FBI concept that a sitting president cannot be indicted. However, he did list about 10 incidents of obstruction that the House could go after because they do not operate under those restraints.
Click to expand...


A prosecutor either finds enough evidence to charge someone or he doesn’t. He doesn't make a list for the house to go after someone.

He knows that if he doesn't make a conclusion about on whether to charge or not it is left up to the Atty. General to make a conclusion.
 
Southern Chicken said:
Yes that is what the heads of the DOJ said in the following:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/wi...p-obstruction-of-justice-russia-investigation
Click to expand...

Right.

The DOJ rules are more like guidelines than laws. There’s also rules/guidelines pertaining to conflicts of interest that Mullet ran roughshod over in simply taking the job: he was a personal friend of a principal witness in any obstruction charge over the Comey firing.

But appealing DOJ constraints against formally indicting a president is at least a strong argument. The argument in support of not reaching a conclusion is a joke, by comparison; particularly, in light of Mullet’s disregard for the aforementioned guidelines pertaining to conflicts of interest. There is no debate about those.

Mullet was ‘prevented’ from reaching a conclusion because he couldn’t get the conclusion he wanted. So he did the best that he could under the circumstances.

Weasel.
 
LV426 said:
Nope.

Here's what you said:



.
Click to expand...

I can't believe that I have to post this. Ok let's look at the definitions of Comprehend and understand. from Merriam-Webster


understand verb


un·​der·​stand | \ ˌən-dər-ˈstand

\

understood\ ˌən-​dər-​ˈstu̇d

\; understanding


Definition of understand



transitive verb


1a : to grasp the meaning of



Then Comprehend


comprehend verb


com·​pre·​hend | \ ˌkäm-pri-ˈhend

, -prē-\

comprehended; comprehending; comprehends



Definition of comprehend



transitive verb


1 : to grasp the nature, significance, or meaning of.
 
Superfreak said:
Wrong. First, that is a DOJ guideline. Second, Mueller was still able to recommend indictment... it simply would have been delayed until Trump was out of office under the guideline.

So you are incorrect. Mueller could have reached the conclusion if he felt he had the evidence.
Click to expand...
He recommended that Congress do their best to bring him to justice.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
and when you get to page 182, the conclusion, you find "this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime"......
Click to expand...

Why didn't you quote the entire short paragraph labelled Conclusion? You cherry picked 11 favorable words from one sentence
in it and the best you got was ambiguity. :laugh:

You are no lawyer.

He will be impeached, he will lose in a landslide and he will be jailed. Your president is a criminal and you are not an American.
 
Southern Chicken said:
"Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment, we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President's conduct"
Click to expand...

WHY did they determine not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment? Because of DOJ and OLC rules against indicting a sitting President.

So we keep having the same conversation; you say something that is a half-truth, and I have to correct the record because your strategic defense of Trump and the GOP is sophistry.

Pathetic.
 
Southern Chicken said:
Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment, we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President's conduct.
Click to expand...

So once again, you're being a lying sack of shit by leaving out why Mueller decided not to make a prosecutorial judgment.

It's obvious why you're leaving that out; including it ruins the "no evidence" narrative you're trying to push.

You've a very dishonest person with no ethics or morals.

You lie brazenly because no one has ever held you to account personally for all the lies you tell.

That's why you lie on an anonymous message board; you know there's no accountability here, so you just say whatever stupid shit you want. No one will hold you personally accountable, so you'll just abuse and act in bad faith because who's going to stop you? Not yourself, that's for sure.
 
Southern Chicken said:
I can't believe that I have to post this. Ok let's look at the definitions of Comprehend and understand. from Merriam-Webster
Click to expand...

Doesn't matter if you understood or comprehended it (they're synonyms)...you can't explain any of the details in the report which means you're lying about reading it.

So why are you lying about reading the report?
 
Southern Chicken said:
I can't believe that I have to post this. Ok let's look at the definitions of Comprehend and understand. from Merriam-Webster


understand verb


un·​der·​stand | \ ˌən-dər-ˈstand

\

understood\ ˌən-​dər-​ˈstu̇d

\; understanding


Definition of understand



transitive verb


1a : to grasp the meaning of



Then Comprehend


comprehend verb


com·​pre·​hend | \ ˌkäm-pri-ˈhend

, -prē-\

comprehended; comprehending; comprehends



Definition of comprehend



transitive verb


1 : to grasp the nature, significance, or meaning of.
Click to expand...

So you comprehend the report, you just don't understand it?

Or you understand the report, you just don't comprehend it?

What does that distinction have to do with why Trump ordered Michael Cohen to lie to Congress about the Moscow project?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top