PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
"F. The President's Efforts to Curtail the Special Counsel Investigation"
Poll: More support impeaching Trump than Nixon at start of Watergate
- Thread starter Cinnabar
- Start date
It sure as shit does. What is with you illiterate dumbfuck?
I. FACTUAL RESULTS OF THE OBSTRUCTION INVESTIGATION
This section of the report details the evidence we obtained. We first provide an overview of how Russia became an issue in the 2016 presidential campaign, and how candidate Trump responded. We then tum to the key events that we investigated: the President's conduct concerning the FBI investigation of Michael Flynn; the President's reaction to public confirmation of the FBl's Russia investigation; events leading up to and surrounding the termination of FBI Director Corney; efforts to terminate the Special Counsel; efforts to curtail the scope of the Special Counsel 's investigation; efforts to prevent disclosure of information about the June 9, 2016 Trump Tower meeting between Russians and senior campaign officials; efforts to have the Attorney General unrecuse; and conduct towards McGahn, Cohen, and other witnesses.
We summarize the evidence we found and then analyze it by reference to the three statutory obstruction-of-justice elements: obstructive act, nexus to a proceeding, and intent
How many times do you stupid fucks have to be told the same thing?
"In 1973, the Department of Justice concluded that the indictment and criminal prosecution of a sitting President would unduly interfere with the ability of the executive branch to perform its constitutionally assigned duties, and would thus violate the constitutional separation of powers. No court has addressed this question directly, but the judicial precedents that bear on the continuing validity of our constitutional analysis are consistent with both the analytic approach taken and the conclusions reached. Our view remains that a sitting President is constitutionally immune from indictment and criminal prosecution."
Try to educate yourself about probable cause, dumbfuck.
A midget with tourettes.
Not a one; the Volume II report is a laughable recap of all the reports out of the media that were being leaked to them by the Mueller team.
Southern Chicken
Verified User
I know exactly what it is do you? A cop can use probable cause for searching your property. Doesn't mean you will be charged, does it?
Southern Chicken
Verified User
He would need evidence
WTF are you yammering about asshole? Be specific.
Southern Chicken
Verified User
That was meant for dome, sailor
Southern Chicken
Verified User
Domer
I apologize.
Southern Chicken
Verified User
No worries
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
true....he was acting as a fact finder and found none....
Which form of compensation do you get in continuing to proliferate a lie? Is it goosebumps up and down your spine because it emulates the criminal in The White House or something more substantial? lol
Perhaps YOU are the one that can show the legal charges recommended by Mueller. God knows no other dumb fuck Democrat can.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
non-player character.......in video gaming its the means by which you communicate with the platform as opposed to your fellow players.......
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
I get to call myself the opposite of a lying cunt who refuses to admit the truth that real human beings have come to learn........
Hundreds of former federal prosecutors signed a letter stating that Trump’s conduct would be chargeable as a crime if he was not the president. Mueller’s view is that it’s up to Congress, not him, to make that decision. Trump and his loyal attorney general have decided to continue misleading the public about why Mueller did not formally accuse the president of crimes.
http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/05/mueller-trump-is-not-not-a-criminal.html
http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/05/mueller-trump-is-not-not-a-criminal.html