PBS Newshour a joke

S

Superfreak

Verified User
Robert Mueller said America needs to read the report. But the Report is over 400 pages of some very dry reading. Most Americans will never read that, (since most Americans don't read very much or if they do they read fiction) so last night, PBS NewsHour began summarizing the report for us.

I have to wonder if Fox News did the same thing. Naturally, I can only watch one news show at a time, so I didn't watch Fox News. Is there someone here who watches Fox News and can tell us if they ran a similar summarizing wrap-up of what is in the Mueller Report? (I would be surprised.)

PBS is going to run a series of pieces each night this week summarizing different sections of the Mueller Report. Will Fox News say anything at all about it? Or will they ignore Robert Mueller and pretend it is old news - no longer pertinent. (as expected, since Fox News is so right-biased.)

PBS said the first section of the Mueller Report covers the Russian interference with the 2016 election. The Russians definitely influenced our election and they did their best to get Trump elected. This influence was done in two ways. They ran a very extensive social media campaign in which they spread rumors and false stories, posed as Americans, and even became involved in setting up Trump rallies, coordinated with Trump campaign workers. It is not clear if the Trump campaign workers that the Russians communicated with knew that they were talking to Russians.
"
Click to expand...

The above is from PolitHack

Since some morons are too insecure to actually discuss topics and thus ban anyone that might actually show how pathetic they are... here is another thread to discuss the authors idiocy.

https://thehill.com/opinion/judicia...hame-on-robert-mueller-for-exceeding-his-role

As Deshowitz stated, Mueller has proven himself a political hack. Either he suddenly forgot how our justice system works or he is blatantly disregarding it so that he can push a political agenda.

PoltiHack is similarly dishonest in his thread. Claiming that we are unsure if votes were altered. Claiming that it was a 'very extensive' social media campaign. Blah blah blah.

On another note... how exactly is Fox ignoring what Mueller has said? They are still discussing the bogus collusion charges. They are still talking about the dishonest Mueller. What exactly are they supposed to be discussing that they aren't? Is your point that they should run an identical format to PBS? We won't know, because the coward runs from actual discussion.
 
really, the nut**bag makes thread asking for opinion but bans half the forum.

His assertion is that his people are too stupid to bother and read the report. He does not mention these are the same stupid people that let social media trolling talk them into not voting for Hillary. remember these are Hillary voters that changed their minds due to trolling on social media. so

bottom line is we don't really need stupid people involved in selection of our leaders.

But I thank polisucker for pointing this out for us
 
Superfreak said:
The above is from PolitHack

Since some morons are too insecure to actually discuss topics and thus ban anyone that might actually show how pathetic they are... here is another thread to discuss the authors idiocy.

https://thehill.com/opinion/judicia...hame-on-robert-mueller-for-exceeding-his-role

As Deshowitz stated, Mueller has proven himself a political hack. Either he suddenly forgot how our justice system works or he is blatantly disregarding it so that he can push a political agenda.

PoltiHack is similarly dishonest in his thread. Claiming that we are unsure if votes were altered. Claiming that it was a 'very extensive' social media campaign. Blah blah blah.

On another note... how exactly is Fox ignoring what Mueller has said? They are still discussing the bogus collusion charges. They are still talking about the dishonest Mueller. What exactly are they supposed to be discussing that they aren't? Is your point that they should run an identical format to PBS? We won't know, because the coward runs from actual discussion.
Click to expand...

I love how this cowardly moron thread bans anyone who might disagree with him so he can safely erupt with his lying stupidity in an echo chamber. He defines the term moron.
 
Dershowitz is correct. Mueller was irresponsible and his report reads like a third grade paper. Most of the sources are from media leaks from his office and twitter posts.

What we do know is this:

NO ONE got fired. NO ONE destroyed evidence. NO ONE refused to cooperate. NO ONE shut down the investigation NO ONE chose not to release the entire report. NO ONE exercised executive privilege.

1) Muller said he does not question what Barr did
2) Muller said he is not being prevented from testifying
3) Muller said if he is forced to testify, he will state nothing more than is in his report.

Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top