R dies , his daughter outs his evil

Althea said:
According to your article, it would be unusual for the SC to use this info in deliberations. They might reopen the case and allow oral arguments.
Click to expand...

if they use it for deliberations they then remove teh right of opposing counsel to cross examine the evidence. This is meant to impact the justices so they hear it in the news without going thru due process.

Like the kavanaugh issue.

Dems dont care about due process.
 
tsuke said:
if they use it for deliberations they then remove teh right of opposing counsel to cross examine the evidence. This is meant to impact the justices so they hear it in the news without going thru due process.

Like the kavanaugh issue.

Dems dont care about due process.
Click to expand...
You think the justices will break the law? What do you mean 'this is meant'? This is 'meant' to inform the public about what we already know about this issue.

This is just written proof.
 
Althea said:
You think the justices will break the law? What do you mean 'this is meant'? This is 'meant' to inform the public about what we already know about this issue.

This is just written proof.
Click to expand...

first of lets be clear. 1) they had this since like feb. That they are only bringing it up now means they didnt want the other side to examine it. 2) this is a recovery of a back up which if im understanding correctly is almost impossible to prove has not been tampered with.
 
tsuke said:
first of lets be clear. 1) they had this since like feb. That they are only bringing it up now means they didnt want the other side to examine it. 2) this is a recovery of a back up which if im understanding correctly is almost impossible to prove has not been tampered with.
Click to expand...
Ridiculous. It would have made for a slam dunk before the court.
 
Althea said:
Ridiculous. It would have made for a slam dunk before the court.
Click to expand...

sigh. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/21/...ican-master-of-political-maps-dies-at-75.html

he died last august.

also note "Late last year, Ms. Hofeller said, she contacted the Raleigh office of the advocacy group Common Cause, seeking its help in finding a lawyer unconnected to her father to help settle his estate."

The genesis story here that were supposed to believe is that the girl went to common cause to find an estate lawyer. Thats like me going to the NRA to find a lawyer when someone dies.
 
tsuke said:
sigh. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/21/...ican-master-of-political-maps-dies-at-75.html

he died last august.

also note "Late last year, Ms. Hofeller said, she contacted the Raleigh office of the advocacy group Common Cause, seeking its help in finding a lawyer unconnected to her father to help settle his estate."

The genesis story here that were supposed to believe is that the girl went to common cause to find an estate lawyer. Thats like me going to the NRA to find a lawyer when someone dies.
Click to expand...
Link to something other than NY Times. Not going to subscribe just to prove a point
 
Celticguy said:
Explain all the other questions asked in constitutional terms.
Look back over the decades at what was captured and how it grew from a single line in a ledger to what it is today.
Your constitutional srgument is foolish unless you mean to go back to that single line per household.
Click to expand...

Your failure to quote the Constitution is noted, dumbshit.
 
tsuke said:
its an obituary. seriously just search it. He died august 21 2018
Click to expand...
What does the date of his death have to do with anything? Is it possible that nobody checked his emails until months later? Hell...when my dad died, we sifted through documents for a long time
 
and then his daughter saw these papers and communications


she realized her father was an evil asshole who fought against Democracy and the nation the framers designed


So she told the world of his evil
 
Its obviously a russo bot hole


Itss one thing to be a fox viewer who NEVER hears the truth so is fooled


Its another thing to be at a place like this where FACTS are all presented to you and still claim Trump is great



these just cant be REAL people

if they are real people they are real EVIL people


so they are evil humans or russo bot holes



which is the bigger insult ?
 
Superfreak said:
No... That is the bullshit fear mongering the left wants you to believe.
Click to expand...

How is it fear mongering when it's in the actual e-mails written by a Conservative operative?

You guys literally said that was the reason.

You're disputing your own words now?


Why would a latino be worried?
Click to expand...

Multiple reasons:

1) The fear of being deported, even though you're a citizen.
2) The harm of not getting representation because of depressed rates of response due to #1.

Again, this is all spelled out in the briefs filed with the court that you're either too lazy or too cowardly to read for yourself.
 
tsuke said:
The genesis story here that were supposed to believe is that the girl went to common cause to find an estate lawyer. Thats like me going to the NRA to find a lawyer when someone dies.
Click to expand...

So your big pants-shitting screech is that it's unfair for lawyers to use what Conservatives have already said and done, in court against them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top