Why is the form not a single page ?
R dies , his daughter outs his evil
- Thread starter evince
- Start date
Lobster used to be food for the poor until some rich New Yorkers decided it wasn't.
evince
Truthmatters
Comey later added that "there was evidence of hacking directed at state-level organizations, state-level campaigns, and the RNC, but old domains of the RNC, meaning old emails they weren't using. None of that was released."
Comey said there was no sign "that the Trump campaign or the current RNC was successfully hacked."
Asked by Sen. Mark Warner, a Virginia Democrat, whether the hacker had the ability to selectively leak that old information, Comey indicated that they did.
Comey also said that the Russians "got far deeper and wider into the (Democratic National Committee) than the RNC," adding that "similar techniques were used in both cases."
Comey said the FBI would have preferred to "get access to the original device or server" that was the target of hacking at the DNC. CNN previously reported that the Democratic National Committee "rebuffed" a request from the FBI to examine its computer services after it was allegedly hacked by Russia during the 2016 election.
The FBI instead relied on the assessment of a third-party security company called CrowdStrIke. Comey told senators that the "highly respected private company eventually got access and shared" the evidence with the FBI.
Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told the Senate committee, examining the cyber breaches, that the intelligence community concluded with "high confidence" that Russia hacked the election to "denigrate" Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and contrast her unfavorably to Republican Donald Trump.
"We have multiple high-quality sources that contribute to that assessment," Clapper said. "Attributing cyber operations is difficult but not impossible."
When Arkansas Republican Sen. Tom Cotton asked whether Russian President Vladimir Putin thought Trump was going to be the likely winner, Clapper responded, "Initially, no. They thought he was a fringe candidate and didn't think that at all."
Clapper said the intelligence community's report on the hacking was based on a variety of sources, including technical data, open-source information and human sources as well. He declined to offer more detail on how the information was collection in order to protect sources.
CIA Director John Brennan said that had called the director of a Russian intelligence agency behind the hacks and warned the Russians that they were playing with fire, a message the Russian said he'd pass on to Putin.
Clapper said that the response to activist attacks of this sort has to be carefully considered.
"It's not our call what to do in response," he said of the intelligence community. He said that policy makers and politicians should "consider the whole range of tools to respond."
"The challenge you get into with cyber for cyber, of course, you also have to consider the counter-retaliation to that," Clapper said. "While we spend a lot of time worrying about precision and being surgical, our adversaries" might not be that careful.
Clapper was asked whether intelligence agencies had found that people close to Trump had business interests that would make the Russians predisposed to favor Trump.
"The Russians just believed, or came to the conclusion, that because the President-elect is a businessman, that he would be easier to make deals with than the Democrats," Clapper said.
Comey said there was no sign "that the Trump campaign or the current RNC was successfully hacked."
Asked by Sen. Mark Warner, a Virginia Democrat, whether the hacker had the ability to selectively leak that old information, Comey indicated that they did.
Comey also said that the Russians "got far deeper and wider into the (Democratic National Committee) than the RNC," adding that "similar techniques were used in both cases."
Comey said the FBI would have preferred to "get access to the original device or server" that was the target of hacking at the DNC. CNN previously reported that the Democratic National Committee "rebuffed" a request from the FBI to examine its computer services after it was allegedly hacked by Russia during the 2016 election.
The FBI instead relied on the assessment of a third-party security company called CrowdStrIke. Comey told senators that the "highly respected private company eventually got access and shared" the evidence with the FBI.
Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told the Senate committee, examining the cyber breaches, that the intelligence community concluded with "high confidence" that Russia hacked the election to "denigrate" Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and contrast her unfavorably to Republican Donald Trump.
"We have multiple high-quality sources that contribute to that assessment," Clapper said. "Attributing cyber operations is difficult but not impossible."
When Arkansas Republican Sen. Tom Cotton asked whether Russian President Vladimir Putin thought Trump was going to be the likely winner, Clapper responded, "Initially, no. They thought he was a fringe candidate and didn't think that at all."
Clapper said the intelligence community's report on the hacking was based on a variety of sources, including technical data, open-source information and human sources as well. He declined to offer more detail on how the information was collection in order to protect sources.
CIA Director John Brennan said that had called the director of a Russian intelligence agency behind the hacks and warned the Russians that they were playing with fire, a message the Russian said he'd pass on to Putin.
Clapper said that the response to activist attacks of this sort has to be carefully considered.
"It's not our call what to do in response," he said of the intelligence community. He said that policy makers and politicians should "consider the whole range of tools to respond."
"The challenge you get into with cyber for cyber, of course, you also have to consider the counter-retaliation to that," Clapper said. "While we spend a lot of time worrying about precision and being surgical, our adversaries" might not be that careful.
Clapper was asked whether intelligence agencies had found that people close to Trump had business interests that would make the Russians predisposed to favor Trump.
"The Russians just believed, or came to the conclusion, that because the President-elect is a businessman, that he would be easier to make deals with than the Democrats," Clapper said.
This data is used in many ways. Why are you afraid of data ?
All census data does is determine representation in Congress and count the number of people living in the nation.
That's it.
Conservatives revealed they are trying to politicize it so they can preserve their tenuous majority, even as the country's demographics have shifted so dramatically, they are in the minority.
evince
Truthmatters
supply and demand
I say a poor child should be allowed to taste more than just cheap foods
its time people quit pretending the poor are cheating the wealthy
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
How does a citizenship question hurt latinos who are citizens?
There are only two uses for census data, and both are spelled out in the Constitution:
Apportionment of representation, and total count of all people living in the country.
That's it.
evince
Truthmatters
its also determines the data for dispersing federal money for projects
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
All of this is addressed in the court case currently before SCOTUS.
You can read the explanations in the amicus briefs.
Are you too lazy to do that, or are you just a sophistic little bitch?
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
If it fucks over blue states that will be a good thing. You guys have all the money anyway. You don't need federal gobblement money.
Commiefornia is one of the biggest economies in the world I am told. They should be able to self fund
Thank you.
Superfreak
Verified User
I am not aware it ever was reviewed by SCOTUS. According to YOUR link, it didn't make it to them.
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
And when my ancestors got interviewed for the census it became one line in a ledger. Today its a many page form. The census has been modified over the years to capture all manner of demographic data.
Why are you afraid of data ?
Read the amicus brief provided by the plaintiffs in the case currently before the SCOTUS.
Or don't, and just be a lazy little bitch.
Superfreak
Verified User
Again... HOW is it racist? It does not effect any one race in any way it doesn't effect other races. What some guy allegedly said in a letter is not relevant. The question is not racist. It has nothing to do with race.
They do self-fund and they pay for your broke ass.
California only gets back about 75 cents of every dollar it contributes to the Treasury.
Whereas nearly every single red state gets more back from the Treasury than they contribute.
That's because Conservatives are welfare leeches.
evince
Truthmatters
read the thread cock gobbler