States With Stricter Gun Laws Have Lower Gun Death Rates Because Gun Laws Work

Sorry but the second gives Americans the power to shoot people. We are at peace with slaughtering our population with increasingly more dangerous weapons. Over 1200 kids died from guns last year, just like the founders wanted.
 
Just more delusional wishful thinking. States with stricter gun laws do not have lower homicide rates. Does it really matter whether a person is killed with a gun or is bludgeoned to death? Only control freaks think so.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Are you saying you cannot understand the difference between a baseball bat and a AR? You should not have guns if you think a military weapon good for shooting masses of people and a bat are the same .
 
Does it really matter whether a person is killed with a gun or is bludgeoned to death? Only control freaks think so.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

No, but it's a lot easier to kill someone with a gun. That's why we have mass shootings, but very few mass bludgeonings. It's also why states with gun control are safer.
 
Sorry but the second gives Americans the power to shoot people. We are at peace with slaughtering our population with increasingly more dangerous weapons. Over 1200 kids died from guns last year, just like the founders wanted.

warning: sarcasm is present in this post
 
Just more delusional wishful thinking. States with stricter gun laws do not have lower homicide rates. Does it really matter whether a person is killed with a gun or is bludgeoned to death? Only control freaks think so.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

if you are one of the prospective victims yes it matters


its hard to out run bullets but you can outrun a person with a bat



if you were walking home from the park and someone started running after you screaming they were going to kill you would you prefer that person has an AR or a bat?


your idiot meme lies just suck fucking ass
 
No, but it's a lot easier to kill someone with a gun. That's why we have mass shootings, but very few mass bludgeonings. It's also why states with gun control are safer.

you have already been outed


no one here is going to believe you are actually left


you hate every Democratic party member whos running and you talk about the separation of races


give it up
 
you have already been outed


no one here is going to believe you are actually left


you hate every Democratic party member whos running and you talk about the separation of races


give it up

I don't hate them all, I just don't agree with them on every single issue.
And yes, I'm an Ethnic Nationalist, but what does that have to do with being Left? Where is the contradiction between Ethnic Nationalism and most left-wing issues?
 
Are you saying you cannot understand the difference between a baseball bat and a AR? You should not have guns if you think a military weapon good for shooting masses of people and a bat are the same .

Total diversion and ignorance. So you are another one who thinks that only gun deaths count? And an AR is not "a military weapon".

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
No, but it's a lot easier to kill someone with a gun. That's why we have mass shootings, but very few mass bludgeonings. It's also why states with gun control are safer.
Are they? Does fewer gun deaths automagically make you safer? Are guns the only way to kill people, or just the only way that matters to you? What about the total homicide rate? Are you "safer" if gun deaths go down, but total homicide goes up? California used to have a homicide rate that was below the national average. Now they've got tons of gun control and, last I looked, their homicide rate was above the national average.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Sorry but the second gives Americans the power to shoot people. We are at peace with slaughtering our population with increasingly more dangerous weapons. Over 1200 kids died from guns last year, just like the founders wanted.
Sarcastic BS. According to the anti-gun CDC, guns are sued millions of times each year to prevent crime and protect lives. Think how much worse things would be if people didn't have that protection. A good chunk of our current problem is due to rampant ignorance about firearms. Putting gun safety education in our public schools would be a good start.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
if you are one of the prospective victims yes it matters


its hard to out run bullets but you can outrun a person with a bat



if you were walking home from the park and someone started running after you screaming they were going to kill you would you prefer that person has an AR or a bat?


your idiot meme lies just suck fucking ass

So you're more dead if killed with a gun than if you're bludgeoned to death? In the case you hypothesize. I'd rather I had an AR.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Many factors going into the shooting rate. Poverty, punishment of minor crimes, negroes, etc.

I care more about my freedom than about the number of shootings.
 
Sarcastic BS. According to the anti-gun CDC, guns are sued millions of times each year to prevent crime and protect lives. Think how much worse things would be if people didn't have that protection. A good chunk of our current problem is due to rampant ignorance about firearms. Putting gun safety education in our public schools would be a good start.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

There used to be just such classes. My high school had a gun club for just such a purpose. You brought your guns to school for gun club. The school augmented what parents taught their kids in those days.
 
Back
Top