Trump Wanted An Ass Kisser As AG

Well, you are one of those who believes Trump never lies:

https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/01/politics/fact-check-william-barr-lie-to-congress/index.html



Yes he punted, and Barr decided to protect his boss rather then do what he was legally required to do.

https://www.nybooks.com/daily/2019/04/26/mueller-prosecutors-trump-did-obstruct-justice/

Prosecutors working for Special Counsel Robert Mueller concluded last year that they had sufficient evidence to seek criminal charges against President Donald Trump for obstruction of justice over the president’s alleged pressuring of then FBI Director James Comey in February 2017 to shut down an FBI investigation of the president’s then national security adviser, Michael Flynn.

Privately, the two prosecutors, who were then employed in the special counsel’s office, told other Justice Department officials that had it not been for the unique nature of the case—the investigation of a sitting president of the United States, and one who tried to use the powers of his office to thwart and even close down the special counsel’s investigation—they would have advocated that he face federal criminal charges. I learned of the conclusions of the two former Mueller prosecutors not by any leak, either from them personally or from the office of special counsel. Rather, the two prosecutors disclosed this information in then-confidential conversations with two other federal law enforcement officials, who subsequently recounted what they were told to me.

On March 24, without consulting with Mueller, Attorney General William Barr declared that in the absence of a final judgment by Mueller as to whether or not the president broke the law, he, the attorney general, had taken it upon himself to make that determination in a summary he sent to Congress. Barr decided that Trump wouldn’t be charged with a crime. But many career Justice Department employees, former prosecutors for the special counsel, and legal scholars have questioned the propriety and legitimacy of Barr’s making such a decision.

Given the Justice Department’s longstanding doctrine that a president cannot face criminal indictment while in office, Mueller suggested in his report that Congress could still act: the special counsel made more than twenty references in his report to Congress’s impeachment power. But the House Democratic leadership has spoken of impeachment proceedings in only the most tentative way, and some Democratic lawmakers have expressed outright disapproval



Only for collusion, and obstruction. He never obtained Trumps bank records, or who Trump was indebted to.

Congress is, but useful idiots like you will still defend your lying coward.

1) you are a dishonest hack. I said Barr did not lie about the Mueller report and you respond with nonsense about Trump lying? Not once have i ever stated any such nonsense. But you lied and now you are trying to spin. Barr did not lie about the report.

2) you clearly have no clue. Barr is the AG. It is absolutely up to him to decide if the DoJ brings charges on anything Mueller didn't. Congress can disagree and impeach of they think there is a case. What is it you think Barr was legally supposed to do that he didn't do?

3) there is no reason Mueller should have gone fishing through Trumps past financials. Unless you are also saying the IRS is ok inept?
 
Well, you are one of those who believes Trump never lies:

https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/01/politics/fact-check-william-barr-lie-to-congress/index.html



Yes he punted, and Barr decided to protect his boss rather then do what he was legally required to do.

https://www.nybooks.com/daily/2019/04/26/mueller-prosecutors-trump-did-obstruct-justice/

Prosecutors working for Special Counsel Robert Mueller concluded last year that they had sufficient evidence to seek criminal charges against President Donald Trump for obstruction of justice over the president’s alleged pressuring of then FBI Director James Comey in February 2017 to shut down an FBI investigation of the president’s then national security adviser, Michael Flynn.

Privately, the two prosecutors, who were then employed in the special counsel’s office, told other Justice Department officials that had it not been for the unique nature of the case—the investigation of a sitting president of the United States, and one who tried to use the powers of his office to thwart and even close down the special counsel’s investigation—they would have advocated that he face federal criminal charges. I learned of the conclusions of the two former Mueller prosecutors not by any leak, either from them personally or from the office of special counsel. Rather, the two prosecutors disclosed this information in then-confidential conversations with two other federal law enforcement officials, who subsequently recounted what they were told to me.

On March 24, without consulting with Mueller, Attorney General William Barr declared that in the absence of a final judgment by Mueller as to whether or not the president broke the law, he, the attorney general, had taken it upon himself to make that determination in a summary he sent to Congress. Barr decided that Trump wouldn’t be charged with a crime. But many career Justice Department employees, former prosecutors for the special counsel, and legal scholars have questioned the propriety and legitimacy of Barr’s making such a decision.

Given the Justice Department’s longstanding doctrine that a president cannot face criminal indictment while in office, Mueller suggested in his report that Congress could still act: the special counsel made more than twenty references in his report to Congress’s impeachment power. But the House Democratic leadership has spoken of impeachment proceedings in only the most tentative way, and some Democratic lawmakers have expressed outright disapproval



Only for collusion, and obstruction. He never obtained Trumps bank records, or who Trump was indebted to.

Congress is, but useful idiots like you will still defend your lying coward.

Your wasting your time with that one.

He's a pathological liar and twump worshiper.
 
Obviously you don't want to answer my question since the answer destroys your position so completely. I therefore accept you concession.

I have no position, but I know the answer. I’m just waiting for you to try to educate your own willfully ignorant ass.

Try to take a few minutes and get back to me, lazy ass.
 
I have no position, but I know the answer. I’m just waiting for you to try to educate your own willfully ignorant ass.

Try to take a few minutes and get back to me, lazy ass.

^ Too much of a coward to even admit that he has a position, or too stupid to realize that he's already posted it...
 
^ Too much of a coward to even admit that he has a position, or too stupid to realize that he's already posted it...

Do I have a position on JCPOA? No, dumbfuck.

Now, willfully ignatant lazy fuck, have you figured out the anwer yet? No, of couse you haven’t.

I’ll ask the questions again for you.

Did Congress authorize the cash?
Did they need to?

Now, take 5 minutes to educate yourself so you don’t keep making a fool of yourself.
 
Three in two short sentences, claiming me to be willfully ignorant and lazy. Priceless!

Or did you mean something entirely different?
:bigthink:

Did Congress approve the cash?
Did they need to?

Those were your questions, moron. Why haven’t you taken the 10 minutes it takes to figure it out?

Because you’re a willfully ignorant lazy ass.
 
The point, dumbfuck, is that it was their money.

No…...it was not their money until BHO gave it back to them knowing exactly how it would be used, not in support of the citizens of Iran but to fund the Muslim Brotherhood network of terrorism. As I said, BHO was actually a MANCHURIAN POTUS who gave support to world wide terrorist networks in the form of monetary aid, gun running, and even unilateral Military Support to place the Brotherhood on the throne where a secular administration once ruled. ;) What action did BHO take when the people of IRAN began an uprising against the rule of the Muslim Mullah's in a quest for democratic rule....did he help the people of IRAN or turn his back on them? Strange he had no problem in taking unilateral military action in four other nations claiming he was helping the people set up democratic governments...when in reality he was helping the Brotherhood take out the secular rulers....he stuck his nose up the ass of every nation in the middle east except IRAN. I wonder why? Some Arab Spring...no?
 
Last edited:
No…...it was not their money until BHO gave it back to them knowing exactly how it would be used, not in support of the citizens of Iran but to fund the Muslim Brotherhood network of terrorism. As I said, BHO was actually a MANCHURIAN POTUS who gave support to world wide terrorist networks in the form of monetary aid, gun running, and even unilateral Military Support to place the Brotherhood on the throne where a secular administration once ruled. ;) What action did BHO take when the people of IRAN began an uprising against the rule of the Muslim Mullah's in a quest for democratic rule....did he help the people of IRAN or turn his back on them?

He turned the other way, Ralphie.
 
No…...it was not their money until BHO gave it back to them knowing exactly how it would be used, not in support of the citizens of Iran but to fund the Muslim Brotherhood network of terrorism. As I said, BHO was actually a MANCHURIAN POTUS who gave support to world wide terrorist networks in the form of monetary aid, gun running, and even unilateral Military Support to place the Brotherhood on the throne where a secular administration once ruled. ;) What action did BHO take when the people of IRAN began an uprising against the rule of the Muslim Mullah's in a quest for democratic rule....did he help the people of IRAN or turn his back on them? Strange he had no problem in taking unilateral military action in four other nations claiming he was helping the people set up democratic governments...when in reality he was helping the Brotherhood take out the secular rulers....he stuck his nose up the ass of every nation in the middle except IRAN. I wonder why?
Iranian Green Movement.
Obama could not even condemn the death of Neda Agha-Soltan (drew worldwide attention after she was shot dead)
neda_agha-soltan_killed-250px.jpg
 
No…...it was not their money until BHO gave it back to them knowing exactly how it would be used, not in support of the citizens of Iran but to fund the Muslim Brotherhood network of terrorism. As I said, BHO was actually a MANCHURIAN POTUS who gave support to world wide terrorist networks in the form of monetary aid, gun running, and even unilateral Military Support to place the Brotherhood on the throne where a secular administration once ruled. ;) What action did BHO take when the people of IRAN began an uprising against the rule of the Muslim Mullah's in a quest for democratic rule....did he help the people of IRAN or turn his back on them? Strange he had no problem in taking unilateral military action in four other nations claiming he was helping the people set up democratic governments...when in reality he was helping the Brotherhood take out the secular rulers....he stuck his nose up the ass of every nation in the middle east except IRAN. I wonder why? Some Arab Spring...no?

Educate yourself, dumbfuck. It was their own frozen assets. BHO didn’t make the agreement, stupid fuck.

Why do idiots like you want to remain so willfully ignorant?
 
Back
Top