DEMS will read the ENTIRE (tho redacted) MUELLER report on House FL THU!

Darth Beto Omar said:
Suess was at least entertaining lol.

Democrats are engaged in a vain attempt to keep the collusion narrative alive. Or is it the obstruction narrative—it’s hard to keep track. The Resistance has an astounding lack of self-awareness. Even if Trump underlings were egging-on the Russians in releasing Hillary’s dirty laundry—it would have been impossible without Hillary’s *dirty laundry*.

Not to mention the fact Hillary’s campaign and the DNC colluded with Steele, who colluded with Russians, in releasing the Steele Dossier, which is Russian propaganda, which Comey and Brennan are both blaming each other for becoming part of the Russian investigation.

The latter is the real story. Collusion is yesterday’s Fake News.
Click to expand...
indeed! much more interesting then Green Eggs and Ham.. :rolleyes: good post. I can't add anything
 
evince said:
see

the right refuses all FACTS


time to punish them for it
Click to expand...
It's difficult to differentiate between the right and Russkie trolls and bots. They have become interchangeable and just as anti-American. That is why when Trumpanzees chant USA USA USA at Drumpf rallies like programmed puppets it is so pathetically ridiculous.
 
Mueller provided a roadmap for the Congress to impeach "Individual 1" or whatever they decide to do to expose him and his accomplices. This is patently clear within the contents of what is being read now.
 
CharacterAssassin said:
Please stop showing up here cum-drunk to the gills and lying through your tooth.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...rump-russia-collusion/?utm_term=.38700e7bd525

"To assert “no evidence,” however, is another matter altogether. Jeffrey Toobin, CNN’s ubiquitous chief legal analyst, tells the Erik Wemple Blog: “One thing we know with certainty is that Mueller is not bringing a criminal case based on the collusion set of issues.” Toobin was addressing none of the journalism of recent days — merely the legal issues at hand. “But that doesn’t mean there’s no evidence of collusion. It only means there’s not a prosecutable case. There’s a world of difference between ‘no evidence’ and not enough evidence to bring an actual case,” Toobin says.

A former federal prosecutor, Toobin noted that people in this line of work don’t traffic in terms such as “no evidence.” Prosecutors tend to speak in terms of “sufficient evidence” to bring a case vs. “insufficient evidence” to do so. Use of the term “did not establish,” says Toobin, is appropriate for these circumstances: “It’s important to recognize what it means. It means not proven. It doesn’t mean zero evidence,” he says."

Nice owning you, silly whore.
Click to expand...

lol so you listen to a cnn talking head over the guy, mueller that actually wrote the report? he literally said there was NO EVIDENCE. mueller didn't say he didn't have enough evidence for a case, he said definitively there was no evidence that any american conspiried or coordinated with russa. no one. nothing. zero. zilch.
 
lying rules said:
lol so you listen to a cnn talking head over the guy, mueller that actually wrote the report? he literally said there was NO EVIDENCE. mueller didn't say he didn't have enough evidence for a case, he said definitively there was no evidence that any american conspiried or coordinated with russa. no one. nothing. zero. zilch.
Click to expand...

Please. Evidence is for proles.

:indeed:
 
Earl said:
"Family, Son; Thug Tactics Coerced Plea Deal


Gen. Michael Flynn didn’t cut a deal with U.S. Special Counsel Robert Mueller because he was necessarily guilty of lying to the FBI, or any crimes, according to sources close to the retired general.

Flynn was muscled and coerced into a plea deal, several sources said.

Flynn plead guilty after Mueller threatened Flynn’s family, including his son Michael Jr. According to sources close to Flynn family, Mueller threatened Flynn on multiple occasions that if he did not plead guilty to lying to the FBI, Mueller would investigate other Flynn family members.

Including his son. And rack up thousands more dollars in legal fees."
Click to expand...

So he was coerced!!

:palm:
 
Earl said:
Oh, look, the loons on this thread want the unredacted Mueller Report read...in violation of the laws protecting Grand Jury testimony and ongoing investigations.

The loons are a bunch of criminals.
Click to expand...

It's because they want to see if their own names are mentioned and not in a good way.

:truestory:
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
So he was coerced!!

:palm:
Click to expand...

Yup. It's sad, but that's how Mullet rolls (or should I say Pit bull Weisman).
When you do a little background work on that dynamic sleazy duo you'll see they have quite a history together. Give them
the man and they'll create the crime. :(
 
Last edited:
Stretch said:
Yup. It's sad, but that's Mullet rolls (or should I say Pit bull Weisman).
When you do a little background work on that dynamic sleazy duo you'll see they have quite a history together. Give them
the man and they'll create the crime. :(
Click to expand...
Weisman was in charge of the hiring for the Mullet Fishing Expedition/
You can see how he stacked the deck with Clintonistas and hate towards Trump
 
Cinnabar said:
Mueller provided a roadmap for the Congress to impeach "Individual 1" or whatever they decide to do to expose him and his accomplices. This is patently clear within the contents of what is being read now.
Click to expand...

I’m trying to wrap my brain around why it needs to be read aloud.

The Mullet report is been available for a month[?] now. I could have gotten through the 400 pages by now just reading in my spare time. Can’t the Congress Critters read it themselves lol? And who really thinks anyone is paying attention to it? Try to imagine how mind-numbingly boring it would be to sit there for hours on end while the Gentleman Democrat from Nebraska, or where ever, drones-on, page after page after page of the Mullet report.

I’ll guarantee if the camera pans out half the listeners are either dozing off or checking their FB status or shopping on Amazon.

What’s the point of it?
 
lying rules said:
lol so you listen to a cnn talking head over the guy, mueller that actually wrote the report? he literally said there was NO EVIDENCE. mueller didn't say he didn't have enough evidence for a case, he said definitively there was no evidence that any american conspiried or coordinated with russa. no one. nothing. zero. zilch.
Click to expand...

LOL! So you admit you lied, you haven't read the report and you don't really understand the English language.

He literally didn't say there's no evidence.

Please be less of a whore than your mom.
 
Althea said:
Incorrect. Those who were complicit went to jail, albeit for reduced charges because they cooperated.

trumpco is filthy. Wait for SDNY if you like, but we all know exactly what happened. I'm going to love when the inauguration funding hits the news.
Click to expand...

Wrong. No one was charged with conspiracy or collusion with Russia. No one.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top