Jobs Are Booming in Trump Country

archives said:
Trump inherited an economy that had been moving forward for six years the day he took office
Click to expand...


Everything that happened after Obama took office is Obama's glory,
and everything that happened AFTER Obama left, is Obamas glory too?

And you wonder why no one takes you serious?
you're a clown, with big red shoes.
dance.jpg
 
LV426 said:
STOP, YOU FREAKING HACK.

1. It was also the worst economic collapse since the Great Depression, caused by the same deregulatory policies you champion on other threads, when it's convenient for you.

2. Conservatives refused to do anything to recover the economy. In fact, McConnell said his job was to deny Obama a second term (he failed there too)

3. Once Cons took control of the House after the 2010 elections, they passed nothing -NOTHING- to help recover the economy.

4. The only piece of legislation Conservatives got passed was the Sequester which did not help the economy.
Click to expand...

Irony from an ignorant dishonest dumb hack on steroids. Yeah, Obama failed because of the Republicans. You sad, pathetic dumb fuck. Fuck you.

LV426 said:
By voting for the joke candidate in Johnson, you were casting your vote for Trump. Voting Gary Johnson doesn't make you clever, or independent...it makes you a coward. OR it means you don't take this shit as seriously because you know your privilege insulates you from most of the policies either party puts forth.

So fucking lazy.
Click to expand...

More irony from a lazy, impotent, pathetic piece of human excrement who thinks voting for a corrupt hag like Hillary was smart. STFU you despicable whiny little cunt.
 
Superfreak said:
Here are some FACTS for you:

Another PROMISE KEPT; Pres.Trump has made LIFE BETTER for WORKING CLASS AMERICANS. Now, let's work on increasing working class pay, instead of FINANCIAL SECTOR (dominated by democrats) and BIG TECH (dominated by Democrats) pay increases.

We see who the "Party of the Elite" is...don't we?





Jobs Are Booming in Trump Country



Jobs are now growing at a faster rate in Trump country than they are in the Democratic-leaning urban and coastal areas that long had been a main driver of the U.S. economic expansion.

During the first 21 months of Donald Trump’s presidency, the 2,622 mostly rural and exurban counties he won in the 2016 election added jobs at twice the pace they did during the previous two years under the Obama administration and at a slightly higher rate than the 490 counties that supported Democrat Hillary Clinton.




https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...y-gap-persists
Click to expand...
Did you miss the same article in the OP? Why did you redact the same part of the article as the OP did?
 
Oneuli said:
One of the great things about the Obama years was that the economy was setting an all-time record for consecutive months of job creation even as we worked on bringing the fundamentals in line. It wasn't "sugar rush" job creation driven by rising deficits and exploding consumer debt. Quite the contrary -- the federal budget deficit fell dramatically on Obama's watch, and we had the most rapid decline in household debt as a share of GDP in history. That set us up for sustained economic strength, as opposed to financing a little short-term job creation at the cost of long-term economic headaches.

The good thing about the Trump years, so far, is that we have managed to continue Obama's streak of job creation. The bad news is that we've done it by way of a sugar rush. Federal budget deficits have exploded, with no end in sight for the increase. At a point in the business cycle when any sane economist would tell you we should be paring deficits, we're growing them rapidly. And the big decline in household debt from the Obama years appears to have been replaced by another Bush-style surge in that private debt burden. This comes with a mirror deficit in the form of the trade deficit, as effectively Americans are buying stuff on foreign credit. That's the economic equivalent of empty calories.... it can fuel some immediate activity, but it isn't healthy in the long run.

Can we get back to having both sustained employment growth and gradually improving economic fundamentals? I'd like to think so, but I just don't see it as politically likely. The "conservatives" only pretend to compare about fiscal responsibility when we have Democratic presidents. They're completely satisfied with all the empty calories Republicans want to binge on.
Click to expand...
Does Grock give you the impression that he can understand one word you wrote?

I don't see it.
 
archives said:
I'm afraid "oneuli" has you there "cawacko," GDP may be a leading indicator, but no one indicator defines the economy, and he does make a point with the "across-the-board improvement of social and economic indicators, which is not something we typically see during a recovery."
Click to expand...
The most current GDP report states that the trump govt. shutdown forced state/local govts. to drastically increase spending. That accounts for about 1 point of the GDP that was reported.
 
Althea said:
The most current GDP report states that the trump govt. shutdown forced state/local govts. to drastically increase spending. That accounts for about 1 point of the GDP that was reported.
Click to expand...

Important point to be made that doesn't get enough oxygen.
 
Teflon Don said:
Look who slinked back
How is your lawsuit against JPP progressing?
bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Click to expand...

Well, funny you should ask...

Damocles tried to explain that Mods editing posts is OK because it's their duties...only, two of the posts of mine that were hacked didn't show any edits by a mod.

Which means the Mod hacked the account to post them.
 
Althea said:
LMFAO! Are you stupid, or just taking a page out of Dummkopf's playbook? Redact that which doesn't support your lies, and ignore all facts to the contrary.

Gotta love the delusions of trump supporters. Let's examine your article, starting with the top of the page, where you began your redactions.



Then...





Followed by:

OOOPS!!!


Why wouldn't the study take into account the $12billion that taxpayers had to pay for the soy farmers' Socialist bailout?

And the money shot:


At least Dummkopf can blame his delusions on years of opiate abuse. What's your excuse...liar?
Click to expand...

SAVAGE TAKEDOWN
 
cawacko said:
Three rounds of QE is not considering the Fed super charging the economy? And the fact that Obama had interest rates at zero for most of his term and they were still under 1% when he left office means there was an external drag on the economy caused by the Fed?

This is absolutely amazing spin (it's outright false or lying, but we'll stick with the term spin). To the fact that it's almost very impressive.
Click to expand...

"I'm no economics expert. In fact I'm pretty dumb on the topic".
-Cawacko
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top