Last time Earth hit these CO2 levels there were trees at the South Pole

[LV426]

Tom is limey cunt but on this topic he is the most knowledgeable on JPP

Really? Because he flames the board or because he makes up shit about himself?

Do you...do you think that is what makes someone knowledgeable?

 

[Moosakofsky]

OK a few things:

1. What are you afraid of?

Dicks like you posting bad reviews having never been seen by me or the staff.

2. So you make anonymous claims on an anonymous message board, then posture that you don't care if we don't believe these claims that you just went through the effort to make.

Make the effort to read the criteria for getting published in Compendium or J. Am. Chem. Soc and compare that to most climate studies. I actually found a climate study that concluded an increase in Temperature causes increased [C] . I'll try to find it for you but I haven't seen it in years.

3. YOU are the one who said YOU had written papers.

Co-authored two.

 

[Teflon Don]

You got fucked up in this debate, and now you're searching for a way out.

So after arrogantly arguing your position with fake anecdotes, and getting called out on them, your instinct is to now back away from the veracity of your previous position to gaslight me.

Nothing you say about yourself is true, is it?

It seems very important to you that I believe in global warming. Why is that?

Also, “winning” message board arguments seems to be very important to you. Why is that?

 

[LV426]

odd then that the one from 150,000 years ago was worse than this one that "we caused".......

Humans weren't around 150,000 years ago.

Nothing happens in our Climate "just because", that's simplistic thinking from people who believe in sky faires from a book commissioned 400 years ago, and who then live their lives according to those rituals and rules.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

So you either did Lazy Man's work, or Lying Man's work.

If it's Lazy Man's work, then you just did a simple, superficial Google search of the terms you needed to post your shit.

If it's Lying Man's work, then you actually saw those bigger models, saw they undermined your argument, and chose to withhold them or cherry pick the chart.

So are you lazy or a liar?

lol.....and what models do you have that are bigger than 450,000 years?.....

 

[LV426]

Dicks like you posting bad reviews having never been seen by me or the staff.

1. I don't believe you have a business.

2. If you did have a business and are consumed with its reputation, does that mean you come to this anonymous board to express the things you know your customers would not approve or agree with?

3. If #2 is true, doesn't that make you a coward?

 

[Sailor]

It seems very important to you that I believe in global warming. Why is that?

Also, “winning” message board arguments seems to be very important to you. Why is that?

He sure as fuck is not going to win outside the real world.....

 

[LV426]

Make the effort to read the criteria for getting published in Compendium or J. Am. Chem. Soc and compare that to most climate studies.

Stop sending me on wild goose chases because you are full of shit.

If you ever wrote a paper, link to it. That way, we can determine your qualifications for ourselves, instead of letting you try to define them anonymously. Don't come here and posture ambiguities because you don't want to give a stranger the satisfaction of having put you in your place.

Basically, put up or shut the fuck up.

 

[LV426]

I actually found a climate study that concluded an increase in Temperature causes increased [C] . I'll try to find it for you but I haven't seen it in years.Co-authored two.

Don't believe you, and you'll never prove it.

So you make these claims to establish credibility for yourself, but when asked to verify those claims, you flat-out refuse because you're a coward.

Here's a tip: STOP LEANING ON ANECDOTES TO MAKE AN ARGUMENT.

 

[LV426]

Co-authored two.

Bullshit. Prove it.

 

[Sailor]

LV is melting down again. Stupid fuck.

 

[LV426]

It seems very important to you that I believe in global warming. Why is that?
Also, “winning” message board arguments seems to be very important to you. Why is that?

After you arrogantly screeched your denial of Climate Change, you are now pretending you didn't.

Why was it so important for you to screech your Climate denial?

 

[LV426]

lol.....and what models do you have that are bigger than 450,000 years?.....

This isn't about me, this is about you and the effort you put in here.

Effort that is either lazy, or lying.

So which is it? Are you lazy, or are you a liar?

 

[Moosakofsky]

LV is melting down again. Stupid fuck.

Yeah, did you see my screen shot of all the replies he's made to me? It's not difficult to trigger a meltdown in him.

 

[Sailor]

Yeah, did you see my screen shot of all the replies he's made to me? It's not difficult to trigger a meltdown in him.

I did see it. That dude has big time issues Doc.

 

[cancel2 2022]

You are the one whose ego is so fragile, that to save face on an anonymous message board you invent personal credentials.

Weirdo.

I have a considerable hinterland on this board, whereas you have fuck all at best!

 

[Teflon Don]

After you arrogantly screeched your denial of Climate Change, you are now pretending you didn't.

Why was it so important for you to screech your Climate denial?

I am not denying anything

Let me be clear on my position. I believe the climate changes. It always has. In fact it changes four times a year like clockwork. It gets warmer. It gets colder.

What I don’t believe is that anything man has done has anything to do with it

 

[PostmodernProphet]

This isn't about me, this is about you and the effort you put in here.

Effort that is either lazy, or lying.

So which is it? Are you lazy, or are you a liar?

silly cunt.....this is about the fact you've been proven to be a fool.....tell us who caused the global warming in the three previous cycles or stfu.......

 

[Grugore]

During the little ice age, in the 19th century, global temperatures were only 2-3 degrees cooler than they are today. That was when the entire planet had a year without a Summer. Millions starved because little food could be grown. Cold is bad. Warm is good. Temperatures have been significantly warmer in the past. Why do you think the Vikings called their new home Greenland?

 

[Cypress]

The only hoax here are Anonymoose's self-professed, unverified, and unsolicited credentials.

I don't know anything about that, but there is not one single trained climate scientist who conducts and publishes peer reviewed research on this message board forum.

Not a single one.

The rest of us have almost no scientific credibility in even discussing climate science.

We are either stuck with deferring to scientific consensus published by IPCC, NOAA, EPA, UK Met, and other prestigious scientific organizations with expertise in climate.

Or, we have to resort to parroting bullet points we read on rightwing blogs and non-peer reviewed rightwing blog science. In the hopes that parroting here what we read on rightwing websites makes us sound smart and credible.

Those are really the only two options. Not a single poster here has the training, education, and profound knowledge of the body of peer reviewed climate science out there to really position ourselves as experts. That kind of expertise only comes from eight years of university subject-matter training minimum, followed by a career of conducting and publishing original, peer reviewed research. That is how scientific credibility is earned. The best we here can hope for is to be armchair experts - poseurs - wanna bees, when it comes to credible climate science.

Can you imagine the time wasted on memorizing bad scientific talking points from obscure rightwing websites? It amounts to spending time to willfully misinform yourself. Imagine that time spent on real education, hobbies, or other forms of self improvement.

Expertise matters. And that is exactly why every single one of us goes to a dentist rather than a podiatrist for advice on a tooth ache.