Conservatives act in bad faith simply because they've done it for so long, they don't know any other way to act.
Last time Earth hit these CO2 levels there were trees at the South Pole
- Thread starter reagansghost
- Start date
Conservatives act in bad faith simply because they've done it for so long, they don't know any other way to act.
I don't believe you.
So true.
Wow, you didn't understand anything I wrote, did you? Here, let me help. Take the last of those three as an example. What do you think the pace of warming as then, in terms of degrees of warming per century? You don't need to be exact, but be specific. Do you think the pace was around 2 degrees per century? Around one? Around a tenth of a degree per century? And what do you think the pace is now? Again, you don't need to be exact, but be specific.
You mean when MAN and HIS carbon footprint could not have possibly played a part in that natural cyclical event?
I don't believe any of this.
I think you're lying because you don't want to have to argue that Climate Change is destroying the planet.
Lying leftist thinks he understands stuff. 
The Stunning Statistical Fraud Behind The Global Warming Scare
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration may have a boring name, but it has a very important job: It measures U.S. temperatures. Unfortunately, it seems to be a captive of the global warming religion. Its data are fraudulent.
What do we mean by fraudulent? How about this: NOAA has made repeated "adjustments" to its data, for the presumed scientific reason of making the data sets more accurate.
Nothing wrong with that. Except, all their changes point to one thing — lowering previously measured temperatures to show cooler weather in the past, and raising more recent temperatures to show warming in the recent present.
This creates a data illusion of ever-rising temperatures to match the increase in CO2 in the Earth's atmosphere since the mid-1800s, which global warming advocates say is a cause-and-effect relationship. The more CO2, the more warming.
But the actual measured temperature record shows something different: There have been hot years and hot decades since the turn of the last century, and colder years and colder decades. But the overall measured temperature shows no clear trend over the last century, at least not one that suggests runaway warming.
That is, until the NOAA's statisticians "adjust" the data. Using complex statistical models, they change the data to reflect not reality, but their underlying theories of global warming. That's clear from a simple fact of statistics: Data generate random errors, which cancel out over time. So by averaging data, the errors mostly disappear.
https://www.investors.com/politics/...stical-fraud-behind-the-global-warming-scare/
This is typical Conservatism; when presented with an argument to which you have no credible, valid response, you invent personal backstories, embellishing your given circumstances to lend your shitty argument credibility it doesn't otherwise have.
There is no fucking way in hell you would ever prove these claims about yourself on these boards.
No. Fucking. Chance.
If you're going to bullshit about yourself, at least have the good sense to make it believable.
That won't stop the greenhouse effect.
Which is what happens after the greenhouse effect cooks the planet, idiot.
Translation: I can't.
^ So when the Climate Deniers are no longer credibly able to argue that there was a vast conspiracy of climate scientists faking the data and perpetrating a hoax, they are left with claiming that they are perfectly fine living with a human-induced climate catastrophe because they can live off the land.
But I actually think you are lying your ass off about being a rugged survivalist fully prepared to survive either climate catastrophe or zombie apocalypse.
When you really think about it, lying is what we have come to expect from the Climate Denier community.
It was 80 degrees in Atlanta in January.
The next day, it was 50 degrees.,
The next day, back up to 80.
A couple days later, snow.
A week after that, 80 degrees again.
Stop.
Thing is, you can swap out "Climate Denier" with any Conservative position, and this statement is still true.
How did man, and HIS carbon footprint cause global freezing 2,000,000 years ago?
How did man, and HIS carbon footprint cause global warming to re-occur 14,000 years ago?
How did man, and HIS carbon footprint cause global freezing 450 million years ago?
How did man, and HIS carbon footprint cause global warming to re-occur 45 million years ago?
Boy, this really is 100% accurate.
It's not just Climate Denial...every Conservative position ultimately comes down to an unverifiable anecdote that somehow contradicts all the empirical evidence.
But don't ask them to verify those claims...they...won't. Doing so is just being mean.