Trump defends ‘a great general’ who fought against the U.S.: Robert E. Lee

Sure isn’t, ignorant cocksucker. Had you done any homework on the topic, you would know that the platforms changed from the 1860s.

But, you’re a willfully ignorant shitstain, so you would never know that.

^ Trying to walk it back, failing miserably lol.
 
Both Dems and Reps owned slaves before the civil war. Slave ownership was normal prior. It was the Dems who opposed civil rights following the war.

We are approaching honesty here. Now if you could continue to note that the Republican party was largely founded to oppose human
bondage, by the Northern puritan strain, particularly strong in New England, and further, that this was greatly opposed in the south.
Then add that there was a massive switch as a result of the civil rights movements from the era of Kennedy through Nixon whereby
the Republican party became the conservative party in opposition to civil rights, women's rights and pro military and the Democratic party became that
party in support of minority rights, opposing Vietnam and against a militaristic government, then you would start to be other than a troll.

Honesty comes first. You have none. I don't need a confession mind you, anymore than I need Cabana Poon's admissions about climate science.
It simply is. All history and its recordation are on my side, the side of truth.

The linear path is tripartite, north vs south, conservatism vs liberal and civil rights vs "traditional values." Democrat v Republican does
not trace back in a way that is illustrative of claiming the mantle to any ideas. They switched. All that matters is NOW. You are in the shitstain party
that opposes civil rights, endorses a fucking clown who uses misinformation to drive a wedge in America and make you conservative imbeciles
feel angry.
 
Thanks for confirming what I already stated: "Democrats then and now think that the rich make their coin off the backs of the poor."

I thought the standard lib line was "the party's switched sides." Obviously that is a big fat lie.

I can’t fix your willful ignorance.

Democrats then, DID make their money off the backs of slaves. They were conservatives, dumbfuck. You can put whatever label you want on the party, but it doesn’t change the political philosophy. CONSERVATIVES, dumbfuck.

Today, no different. Conservatives, now called Republicans, are against minimum wage increases. In my part of the country, they hire illegals at minimum wage or below. Still making money off the backs of the poor.

Too bad you stupid fucks can’t differentiate between a party label from 150 years ago from the political philosophy.
 
"Democrats think that the rich make their coin off the backs of the poor."

Everyone thinks that, dumbass. It's called capitalism. By defifuckinition The only difference is Republicans
think it's AOK and that even given this truth there is nonetheless little to no need for a social safety net.
 
I can’t fix your willful ignorance.

Democrats then, DID make their money off the backs of slaves. They were conservatives, dumbfuck. You can put whatever label you want on the party, but it doesn’t change the political philosophy. CONSERVATIVES, dumbfuck.

Today, no different. Conservatives, now called Republicans, are against minimum wage increases. In my part of the country, they hire illegals at minimum wage or below. Still making money off the backs of the poor.

Too bad you stupid fucks can’t differentiate between a party label from 150 years ago from the political philosophy.

Democrats think that the rich take money from the poor. Same as they did when they were slavers. Republicans know different, and took care of that little problem by killing a few hundred thousand 'rats. Didn't stop them from thinking any differently though.
 
Walking it back? What the fuck kind of illiterate shitstain are you?

I’m not walking anything back, bitch. I’m telling you ignorant assholes to do your homework.

Still dividing the races, still think the rich make money off the poor: Democrats.
 
If you get a 50 million credit line from a bank and hire a bunch of people at $12 per hour
to work at your business, you are indeed making money "off the backs of the poor," both you and the bank.

Is this even up for debate? I didn't say it wasn't smart or that the capitalist doesn't also work hard, or even
that it wasn't a good thing. But we have to fucking agree on basic facts.
 
Democrats think that the rich take money from the poor. Same as they did when they were slavers. Republicans know different, and took care of that little problem by killing a few hundred thousand 'rats. Didn't stop them from thinking any differently though.

^Historical ignoramus
 
Back
Top