Scientists have established a link between religious fundamentalism and brain damage

It's established fact that an army of Russian bots posted tons of disinformation on social media to support the Trump campaign.

It is also established fact that they did the same in support of Bernie. And anyone else who was considered an outsider. The goal was to divide our country. The left executed their agenda quite effectively. None of this even INDICATES conspiracy, collusion, etc. And we KNOW that DEMOCRATS colluded, DEMOCRATS rigged elections, and that DEMOCRATS aggressively support foreign influence...everything they pretend to be so offended about with President Trump is what THEY THEMSELVES are the only ones actually ON THE RECORD doing.

:laugh:

thumbnail
 
It is also established fact that they did the same in support of Bernie. And anyone else who was considered an outsider. The goal was to divide our country. The left executed their agenda quite effectively. None of this even INDICATES conspiracy, collusion, etc. And we KNOW that DEMOCRATS colluded, DEMOCRATS rigged elections, and that DEMOCRATS aggressively support foreign influence...everything they pretend to be so offended about with President Trump is what THEY THEMSELVES are the only ones actually ON THE RECORD doing.

[emoji23]

thumbnail
You appear to be, as usual, deep in delusion.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
A study published in the journal Neuropsychologia has shown that religious fundamentalism is, in part, the result of a functional impairment in a brain region known as the prefrontal cortex. The findings suggest that damage to particular areas of the prefrontal cortex indirectly promotes religious fundamentalism by diminishing cognitive flexibility and openness—a psychology term that describes a personality trait which involves dimensions like curiosity, creativity, and open-mindedness.
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/04/sc...13BtPIDvuOKIwX5ggBDrStOOEy9ThR8Ev-GPn7NK5_Mfg

Neuropsychologia is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that focuses on cognitive neuroscience. It was established in 1963, and is published by Elsevier.

"RAW STORY". "Peer reviewed" means nothing more than accepted by the leftist circle jerk.
 
"RAW STORY". "Peer reviewed" means nothing more than accepted by the leftist circle jerk.

"Peer reviewed" means the study is reviewed by others working in the same field. Most studies are peer reviewed, unless they're from Conservatives like Rogoff and Reinheart, who don't have their studies peer reviewed because they want to force through a dishonest, Conservative bias as their conclusion.

Also, the link is from Raw Story, the study comes from Neuropsychologia.

It's OK...I know Conservatives have a hard time reading.
 
You mean like the guy who preyed on teenage girls, or the guy who walked in on them while they were dressing?
No, i mean like the perverts who are in a constant state of change they can believe in. You know, diapered revisionists like you. ;)
 
No, i mean like the perverts who are in a constant state of change they can believe in. You know, diapered revisionists like you.

You're so fucking stupid, you got conned into voting for Donald Trump.

You might not think it now, but that shit is going to come back to haunt you in the future.
 
Back
Top