the "Barr" has been lowered.

Taichiliberal

Shaken, not stirred!
I watched A.G. Barr practically wear a cheerleader uniform and perform on President Trump's (aka Orange Oaf) regarding the (then) yet-to-be released Mueller report.

Here's just a hint as to Barr's bias.....during his press conference, he stated half a dozen times or more that there was "no collusion" between the Orange Oaf, his campaign staff and Russian business/government personnel. And yet, upon release of the report the Mueller report focuses on CONSPIRACY, and NOT collusion, since "collusion" is NOT against the law, per se.

I'm listening to the radio as commentators and personalities thumbing through the report.....and it seems that Mueller's report is NOT as black & white as Barr would
have us believe. Some examples:


https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-...y-special-counsel-robert-muellers-report-now/

https://www.usnews.com/news/politic...ck-barrs-skewed-view-on-airing-mueller-report

Folks, the fix was in on this one when the Orange Oaf put Barr in.....but it ain't over until the proverbial fat lady sings:

http://time.com/5557644/donald-trump-other-investigations-mueller/
 
y6tby28o

Dude, do you even have the intellectual capacity to discuss content? Or dumbly responding with generic cartoons and mantras the best you're capable of? I mean, if it's the latter I won't bother taking you out of the IA bin every few months.
 
I watched A.G. Barr practically wear a cheerleader uniform and perform on President Trump's (aka Orange Oaf) regarding the (then) yet-to-be released Mueller report.

Here's just a hint as to Barr's bias.....during his press conference, he stated half a dozen times or more that there was "no collusion" between the Orange Oaf, his campaign staff and Russian business/government personnel. And yet, upon release of the report the Mueller report focuses on CONSPIRACY, and NOT collusion, since "collusion" is NOT against the law, per se.

I'm listening to the radio as commentators and personalities thumbing through the report.....and it seems that Mueller's report is NOT as black & white as Barr would
have us believe. Some examples:


https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-...y-special-counsel-robert-muellers-report-now/

https://www.usnews.com/news/politic...ck-barrs-skewed-view-on-airing-mueller-report

Folks, the fix was in on this one when the Orange Oaf put Barr in.....but it ain't over until the proverbial fat lady sings:

http://time.com/5557644/donald-trump-other-investigations-mueller/

All looks yellow to the jaundiced eye.
 
I watched A.G. Barr practically wear a cheerleader uniform and perform on President Trump's (aka Orange Oaf) regarding the (then) yet-to-be released Mueller report.

Here's just a hint as to Barr's bias.....during his press conference, he stated half a dozen times or more that there was "no collusion" between the Orange Oaf, his campaign staff and Russian business/government personnel. And yet, upon release of the report the Mueller report focuses on CONSPIRACY, and NOT collusion, since "collusion" is NOT against the law, per se.

I'm listening to the radio as commentators and personalities thumbing through the report.....and it seems that Mueller's report is NOT as black & white as Barr would
have us believe. Some examples:


https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-...y-special-counsel-robert-muellers-report-now/

https://www.usnews.com/news/politic...ck-barrs-skewed-view-on-airing-mueller-report

Folks, the fix was in on this one when the Orange Oaf put Barr in.....but it ain't over until the proverbial fat lady sings:

http://time.com/5557644/donald-trump-other-investigations-mueller/


Here is a newsflash for you puddin. Now get ready because your mind is about to be BLOWN.

A Special Counsel is supposed to investigate CRIMES. Since as you state collusion is not a crime, why would Mueller investigate that? He investigated an actual CRIME of conspiracy.

There was none.

Now continue to keep crying for us. This is almost as enjoyable as November 2016
 
Dude, do you even have the intellectual capacity to discuss content? Or dumbly responding with generic cartoons and mantras the best you're capable of? I mean, if it's the latter I won't bother taking you out of the IA bin every few months.

Pictures are often effective when dealing with the petulant, ignorant and childish, according to educators.
 
Pictures are often effective when dealing with the petulant, ignorant and childish, according to educators.

And that seems to be your level, son...because YOU CAN'T DISCUSS CONTENT, ARE SCARED OF VALID, DOCUMENTED FACTS THAT DON'T FIT YOUR BELIEFS. So while the rest of us adults will have REAL debates, you just amuse yourself with your cartoons. Adios.
 
And that seems to be your level, son...because YOU CAN'T DISCUSS CONTENT, ARE SCARED OF VALID, DOCUMENTED FACTS THAT DON'T FIT YOUR BELIEFS. So while the rest of us adults will have REAL debates, you just amuse yourself with your cartoons. Adios.

I must have missed your dismissals of Cartoon Ken's contribution, loser. :rofl2:
 
Dude, do you even have the intellectual capacity to discuss content? Or dumbly responding with generic cartoons and mantras the best you're capable of? I mean, if it's the latter I won't bother taking you out of the IA bin every few months.

No, that is all "copy and paste" has, reason he has to ban just about everyone on his topic posts, don't waste your time
 
TMT6541-RED-TH-DESIGN.jpg


HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
 
The MUELLER Report.......MUELLER wrote it..........What MUELLER reported. :palm:

CONLUSION regarding conspiracy and coordination with Russia, page 2 of Volume 1
https://html2-f.scribdassets.com/9nmw4orp8g6wc74f/images/10-6071ae3bd7.jpg

***************
CONCLUSION regarding obstruction, page 182 of Volume 2
https://html1-f.scribdassets.com/9nmw4orp8g6wc74f/images/394-786153dfcc.jpg

First, learn how to spell :palm:: C-0-L-L-U-S-I-O-N

Secondly;

Did the Trump campaign conspire with Russia?


No, the Mueller report did not find such coordination occurred, according to Barr.
Here, Barr quoted the Mueller report directly: "(T)he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."

Barr’s letter described how the special counsel’s office defined coordination, which appears to encompass a broader range of conduct than conspiracy.
"In assessing potential conspiracy charges, the special counsel also considered whether members of the Trump campaign ‘coordinated’ with Russian election interference activities," Barr wrote. "The special counsel defined ‘coordination’ as an ‘agreement—tacit or express—between the Trump campaign and the Russian government on election interference.’ "

One important caveat is that it’s not clear from Barr’s letter what level of evidence Mueller’s office considered — for instance, the beyond-a-reasonable-doubt standard that’s applied to criminal prosecutions, or some lower bar.

But the bottom line is Mueller’s team — according to Barr — did not find conspiracy or coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia in its election interference activities.
 
First, learn how to spell :palm:: C-0-L-L-U-S-I-O-N

Secondly;

Did the Trump campaign conspire with Russia?


No, the Mueller report did not find such coordination occurred, according to Barr.
Here, Barr quoted the Mueller report directly: "(T)he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."

Barr’s letter described how the special counsel’s office defined coordination, which appears to encompass a broader range of conduct than conspiracy.
"In assessing potential conspiracy charges, the special counsel also considered whether members of the Trump campaign ‘coordinated’ with Russian election interference activities," Barr wrote. "The special counsel defined ‘coordination’ as an ‘agreement—tacit or express—between the Trump campaign and the Russian government on election interference.’ "

One important caveat is that it’s not clear from Barr’s letter what level of evidence Mueller’s office considered — for instance, the beyond-a-reasonable-doubt standard that’s applied to criminal prosecutions, or some lower bar.

But the bottom line is Mueller’s team — according to Barr — did not find conspiracy or coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia in its election interference activities.

Couldn't even figure out that the word was "CONCLUSION"? I corrected it though Mr. Spellcheck.

This is the MUELLER REPORT!!!!! Not the Barr letter. :palm:

CONCLUSION regarding conspiracy and coordination with Russia, page 2 of Volume 1
https://html2-f.scribdassets.com/9nmw4orp8g6wc74f/images/10-6071ae3bd7.jpg

***************
CONCLUSION regarding obstruction, page 182 of Volume 2
https://html1-f.scribdassets.com/9nmw4orp8g6wc74f/images/394-786153dfcc.jpg
 
Back
Top