gfm7175
Mega MAGA
It appears to be hitting home.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Doesn't bother me one bit. But I'm going to keep calling out something for what it is if it keeps getting repeated...
It appears to be hitting home.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
IOW, it's too accurate, thus too disturbing to you.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
It seems to me that the matter is a very basic one: do men have the right to control women's bodies? We all have our own notions about birth and the future of the unborn, but unless we have to do the carrying, is it really any of our business?No, I don't. I just want you to stop murdering unborn children and/or allowing the murdering of unborn children.
Is THAT belief everyone's belief?
See how that works??
People regularly parrot the bolded statement because it "sounds good" and earns one some "brownie points"... but ANY moral legislation is effectively forcing your own beliefs upon somebody else...
Not by any rational definition of either. A fetus is not an infant nor is it a person.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
It is a human being at the moment of conception. It is alive at that very moment.
Who is forcing you to have an abortion?
Someone needs a refresher on the Constitution and the Judicial Branch's job of determining the Constitutionality of laws....
SCOTUS does not have power to interpret the Constitution. SCOTUS is not an Oligarchy... See Article 3...
I am being forced to accept that murdering unborn children is perfectly fine.
My choice to live in a state which bans it has been taken away by roe v wade.
That's the problem with legislating morality on a national level (unconstitutionally, I might add) rather than on a state level.
The murdering of unborn children IS my business... It is immoral.Abortion isn't any of your business.
Argument By Repetition Fallacy. I have addressed this claim of yours MULTIPLE times... A woman (in the general sense) is not being forced to give birth. She WILLINGLY had sex with a man, and sex can result in pregnancy. It is HER WILLING CHOICE which leads her to potential pregnancy; she is not at any point forced to give birth. Do try to address my counterargument this time...The only reason you seem to make it your business is because you have a vested interest in forcing a woman to give birth.
Psychoquackery.Which means that the reason you believe what you believe is that no woman would voluntarily allow you to conceive a child, so instead you will ban abortion and force yourself upon her, then force her to birth your lizard offspring.
The murdering of unborn children IS my business... It is immoral.
Argument By Repetition Fallacy. I have addressed this claim of yours MULTIPLE times... A woman (in the general sense) is not being forced to give birth. She WILLINGLY had sex with a man, and sex can result in pregnancy. It is HER WILLING CHOICE which leads her to potential pregnancy; she is not at any point forced to give birth. Do try to address my counterargument this time..
Psychoquackery.
The murdering of unborn children IS my business...
The murdering of unborn children IS my business... It is immoral.
That's not even what's going on... The woman is controlling her own body. She is volunteering to have sex, which potentially leads t pregnancy. She is not being forced to birth a baby at any point, as she made the choice to have sex.It seems to me that the matter is a very basic one: do men have the right to control women's bodies?
Correct.We all have our own notions about birth and the future of the unborn,
Yes, it is. I am not going to support murdering children.but unless we have to do the carrying, is it really any of our business?
The woman is controlling her own body. She is volunteering to have sex, which potentially leads t pregnancy. She is not being forced to birth a baby at any point, as she made the choice to have sex.
es, it is. I am not going to support murdering children