You managed to type 3 wrong sentences out of four lol.
Starting at the top: The primary reason for redacting the report is that it contains grand jury findings and these are covered under law; therefore, any leaks will likely/almost certainly be comprised of grand jury information. Which is illegal. Which would make any leakers bigger *crooks* than Trump, ironically.
And this raises an important question: just how many laws are the current DOJ going to be allowed to be broken in this charade before they DO SOMETHING about it? If I were Trump I would give clear instructions to Barr: the first leak that happens of the Mullet report, I wanted the leaker found and INDICTED for a felony. In fact, we already know who some leakers are: they have names like McCabe and Strzok some others. I don’t understand what they are waiting on.
INDICT THEM NOW, to send a clear message that the administration will no longer tolerate leaking—especially, regarding the Mullet report.
And since Mullet is part of the executive branch I’d call him into the principal’s office for a little chitchat about leaking. Since it would be *his people* that would be doing the leaking.
Someone needs to put a stop to this lawlessness—and it’s ultimately Trump’s responsibility as chief executive.
I’m frankly disappointed he hasn’t been more aggressive about it. I sure as hell would.