1AM - Mueller team wrote for PUBLIC release. Actual evidence "alarming & significant"

rjhenn said:
Only after he redacts it to remove his guilt. At which time, the report will probably consist of one sentence that simply says "Trump is innocent".
Click to expand...

I am amused by the moronic leftist notion that Barr could lie about what is contained in Mueller's report without Mueller going public about it. You repugnant lying leftists stoop to new lows.
 
volsrock said:
“Some on Mueller’s team”

Remember, every single henchman in the Mueller-Weissman Gang was a hardcore leftist democrat. Certainly we don’t expect objectivity out of them, do we?
Click to expand...

We certainly don't expect objectivity from any of the local Trump cultists. And we certainly aren't seeing even a trace.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Jarod said:
You are ignoring that it would be easy to release the report without violating the "Grand Jury law" because there is a provision that says all you have to do is ask a Judge permission and it can be released. Congressmen have asked Barr to join them in requesting a judge grant permission and he has refused. Additionally, Barr himself has said he will be redacting much more than Grand Jury information.

You are a limp dick Rump apologist.
Click to expand...
And the summaries written by Mueller's team were written so as to need little or no redacting. So why not release some of them? What is Barr/Trump so afraid of? The whole thing reeks of guilt.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
The Mullet people didn't say anything. It was all anonymous 2nd and 3rd party fake news garbage.
But, you know what? How big was the Mullet "group"? 50? 100? How many worked the investigation on his team?
No doubt there could quite reasonably be a couple who saw things a little differently. No big news there.
 
Earl said:
No one is asking you to trust anyone, Snowflake. You will be forced to respect the US Code and rules and policies of the J/D pertaining to the release of Mueller's report.
Click to expand...
One of those policies under Barr, being "remove everything negative about Trump".

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
anatta said:
ridiculous. there is Rosenweasel and there are DoJ top officials. what you should be worrying about is there was insufficient evidence to indict ( per Mullet)- but it appear Mullet still referred it to DoJ

If you really want more reasoning, then bring in Mullet to testify, and quit trying to get underling docs and grand jury testimony
Click to expand...

What are you trying so desperately to hide?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Earl said:
You are ignoring this:

"The regulations require Barr to notify the top Republicans and Democrats on the House of Representatives and Senate Judiciary Committees that the investigation has ended. Department policy calls for Barr to summarize the confidential report for Congress with “an outline of the actions and the reasons for them.” According to the regulations, Barr “may determine that public release of these reports would be in the public interest, to the extent that release would comply with applicable legal restrictions.”

In deciding what to release, Barr may have to confront thorny legal issues involving secrecy of grand jury testimony, protecting classified information, communications with the White House possibly subject to the principle of executive privilege shielding certain information from disclosure, and safeguarding confidential reasons for why some individuals were not charged. "

Now, take a hike, pende*o.
Click to expand...
Basically you're desperate to hide Trump's guilt.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Earl said:
No, there is NO evidence of Campaign Finance violations. Writing a check in an effort to protect ones family in NO way involves campaign finance violations. Get a clue.
Click to expand...
The usual desperate denial.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
rjhenn said:
We certainly don't expect objectivity from any of the local Trump cultists. And we certainly aren't seeing even a trace.
Click to expand...

rjhenn said:
And the summaries written by Mueller's team were written so as to need little or no redacting. So why not release some of them? What is Barr/Trump so afraid of? The whole thing reeks of guilt.
Click to expand...

rjhenn said:
One of those policies under Barr, being "remove everything negative about Trump".
Click to expand...

rjhenn said:
What are you trying so desperately to hide?
Click to expand...

35576311251_fc80262395.jpg


giphy.gif
 
AssHatZombie said:
which mueller team members? sounds like more bullshit.

why don't you dems regroup, forget collusion, and come up with a vision for the country.
Click to expand...
You mean the vision that we've been following for the past couple of hundred years or so, or Trump's and your vision of turning us into a banana republic, with him as President for life?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Earl said:
I know who anatta is referring to when she posts "Mullet." So do you.

I believe it's an appropriate appellation.
Click to expand...
It tells us that the both of you haven't got an actual argument, and that you're terrified that Mueller found actual evidence of both collusion and obstruction and probably other crimes.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top