Trump to edit the report before release...

[archives]

What’s hilarious/maddening/ironic is that we STILL don’t know whether Trump was ever a subject in the investigation lol.

Mullet inherited a counterintelligence probe into Russian interference. No specific crime was ever alleged in Mullet’s mandate.

Insane.

Mueller was appointed by the Trump Justice Dept to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Are you trying to say that until they officially charged Russia with a criminal offense no one could investigate if and how Russia was involved?

 

[bhaktajan]

It doesn't exonerate him from wearing his socks two days in a row but it does say that there is "insufficient evidence to establish that the president committed that offense."

The rest of your post is equally absurd.

.

Earl what I am saying is that if Mueller closes down his work and hands in a report ... and IF TRUMP is guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors...

Why would Mueller neglect to say it?


What ever the dreams the dems have and are still counting on was not declared by anyone!

If there really is bad things in the report about Trump ... why would Mueller stop from saying so?

"We found NO proof ... except that he once murdered a dozen men in Las Vegas"

"We found NO proof ... except that he is the Godfather of some kids belonging to Mafia Dons"


Ooops.


It morphed into:

"We found NO proof ... except that ya'll can keep looking ifs ya want."

 

[bhaktajan]

What’s hilarious/maddening/ironic is that we STILL don’t know whether Trump was ever a subject in the investigation lol.

Mullet inherited a counterintelligence probe into Russian interference. No specific crime was ever alleged in Mullet’s mandate.

Insane.

So [predicated on your post] IMO the scenario may occur:

that name(s) of Democrat could litter the pages of Mueller's investigations, and that the Dems calling for a full release are about to get Royal Flushed by Trump.

A delicious irony if there ever could be.

 

[Granule]

you fit right in... https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-new...chosis-caused-him-question-sandy-hook-n989091

Why would I do something stupid like that?

If you're saying that we have to stop listening to people because they got something wrong, then every fucking one of you perverts would have to be silenced forever. Do you like the idea of being silenced forever? I know I do, now that I think about it.

 

[Darth Omar]

Mueller was appointed by the Trump Justice Dept to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Are you trying to say that until they officially charged Russia with a criminal offense no one could investigate if and how Russia was involved?

I’m saying there was no basis to appoint an SC to do what the IC was totally capable of doing.

Comey admitted to leaking in order to get an SC appointed. I think it’s past time to explore the possibility that Comey was operating from a corrupt intent.

Trump DID just fire him days before he leaked.

So yes, let’s keep the investigations coming.

 

[Darth Omar]

Hello Darth,



Hey, congratulations for using Rosenstein's actual name. That is an improvement.

Am I OK with him wearing a wire to make sure the President is following the law? Yes. Here's why. The President is not a private individual. He is a public official. The Chief executive has nobody directly over him that he reports to. How to we ensure that he is not overstepping his authority? How do we ensure that he is not above the law? We must have oversight. If the FBI or Justice department suspects that the President may be acting illegally, I WANT them to check up on him. I want every President to know that they are not above the law. They answer to us. A President works for us. We, The People. There has to be oversight.

If nobody is allowed to gather evidence, the 25th Amendment is useless. We cannot allow any individual to have absolute power.

What you call goal post shifting? No. I don't see that. What I see is a process of verifying that our President is operating within the law. If he isn't, we need to know about it and bring him to Justice. If he has done nothing wrong then he has nothing to worry about.

None of these measures would have brought Obama down. He was clean. The acid test is would I support these measure being used against any President, no matter what political party. I would. If there is no there there then a President has nothing to worry about.

If Trump is clean he has nothing to worry about.

The more he squawks about too much oversight? That makes me think he's dirty.

Trump is a total narcissist. He took the worst job he could imagine. First of all, he is not used to working for other people, does not do well in that capacity. Now he took on a job which gives a narcissist enough rope to hang himself. That appears to be what is happening.

It doesn't matter whether I am OK with the way it is going down. The pressure on Trump is not going to let up. And it shouldn't.

It's not a witch hunt. It is the way our nation is designed. It is our system of checks and balances.

Thank you, founders.

It’s absolutely a Witch Hunt.

You all but shout it out when you condone an open-ended investigation for something/anything on Trump. And your condoning of wearing a wire in order to entrap a president—leaves me speechless. THAT IS THE SORT OF THING THEY DO IN RUSSIA lol.

From now on future presidents can expect to be surveilled? Or is this just a ‘Trump thing’?

 

[dukkha]

It’s absolutely a Witch Hunt.

You all but shout it out when you condone an open-ended investigation for something/anything on Trump. And your condoning of wearing a wire in order to entrap a president—leaves me speechless. THAT IS THE SORT OF THING THEY DO IN RUSSIA lol.

From now on future presidents can expect to be surveilled? Or is this just a ‘Trump thing’?

politalk is a clueless fascist. He's polite and all that but views like this are anathema rule of law.
It's pure Stalinism to say "show me the man and i'll show you the crime" which is what wearing a wire without probable cause

I mean do people en think about what they say?

 

[rjhenn]

you fit right in... https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-new...chosis-caused-him-question-sandy-hook-n989091

All Trumpanzees suffer from a psychosis. That's why Trump is such a fan of Alex Jones.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[rjhenn]

Hello Darth,



That's a good quote. I've seen that quote. It does not appear that Trump fans have actually seen it. They and Trump have looked at it, but they have not seen it. They look at it and see something else. They think it says no evidence. I look at it and see that it says the evidence is not sufficient.

So when Trump and his fans say no evidence it lets me know they don't want to see the truth. Just like you don't want to see the truth that the man's name is Mueller.

You don't have a good reason for allowing the President to rewrite the report.

No problem. Support whatever kind of lies you wish.

The man we elected President has a history of being a racist, and con man, and a cheat. That is well documented. Bannon said he's going down on financial.

The Mueller Report may not be it, and I understand why Trump wants to rewrite it. He always has to control the message about him. His true nature must never be revealed; according to him.

This may not be it, but we are not done yet.

When it is it, we won't have to convince you. Because the numbers won't lie.

I bet he goes down on dirty money and/or tax evasion.

Let the investigations continue!

Going back to Darth's "higher standards", never in the history of this country have we had a President who was so obviously unfit and corrupt. Taking him down is an act of patriotism.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[rjhenn]

We already know he and the family conspired to cheat the IRS by low-balling the value of their properties. I hope this is what brings him down. Nothing would pain him more than to be hit in the wallet because money is his god.

I just hope something brings him down before he does irreparable harm.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[Teflon Don]

President is servant of the people,not a King

You will bend the knee

 

[Darth Omar]

Going back to Darth's "higher standards", never in the history of this country have we had a President who was so obviously unfit and corrupt. Taking him down is an act of patriotism.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

The ‘corrupt’ president just survived two years of an SC.

 

[rjhenn]

You don’t have much money, do you?

Envious...yes envious.

No envy there. Just a real understanding of Trump. Not that there's much to understand. No depth to him at all. One has to be deranged to follow and support him.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[Darth Omar]

politalk is a clueless fascist. He's polite and all that but views like this are anathema rule of law.
It's pure Stalinism to say "show me the man and i'll show you the crime" which is what wearing a wire without probable cause

I mean do people en think about what they say?

Either they don’t think or they are woefully clueless about some fundamentals lol.

I guess it never occurs to them the kind of trouble Rosenstein would be in if it were ever proven beyond reasonable doubt he was going to wear a wire in order to entrap a president.

He did well in claiming to be joking.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1111741081731907585

wait, does anyone pay attention to Shitff?......

 

[rjhenn]

It doesn't exonerate him from wearing his socks two days in a row but it does say that there is "insufficient evidence to establish that the president committed that offense."

The rest of your post is equally absurd.

.

According to a couple of Trump drones.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[PostmodernProphet]

Mueller was appointed by the Trump Justice Dept to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Are you trying to say that until they officially charged Russia with a criminal offense no one could investigate if and how Russia was involved?

have we ever before began an investigation without actually knowing if a crime occurred?......because we just found out that none did......

 

[archives]

have we ever before began an investigation without actually knowing if a crime occurred?......

So you answered the question with a question? And yes, the Starr investigation immediately comes to mind

Your turn

 

[Earl]

An investigation looking for a crime...that never happened.

 

[rjhenn]

Total horse mierda.

There is no system of checks and balances that allows the FBI or Justice Department to illegally spy on the president. His communications are protected under Executive Privilege.

You have no clue what these measures would have uncovered if used against Obama. He was shielded by the Justice Department and I believe he would have been discovered to be one of the most corrupt presidents in US history.

You are clearly deep in both TDS and ODS. The President is not above the law. The Constitution says nothing about Executive Privilege. Both the FBI and the Justice Department owe their allegiance to the Constitution, not the President. And there is nothing illegal about investigating a corrupt President.


Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk