White House press corps evicted from hotel ahead of North Korea summit

ZappasGuitar said:
Another pathetic attempt at misdirection from a sad little Trumpkin.

There's a WORLD of difference between Obama's PRIVATE campaign plane and a PUBLIC HOTEL.

But you go right on making excuses...so many of us derive great pleasure from watching you twist and spin.
Click to expand...

Welcome back fatty!
 
Jarod said:
Funny, when Rump took office Kim did not have nukes. Now the goal is to get him to de-nuke.
Click to expand...

OH, really!!

Nuclear power in North Korea

Nuclear weapons program

Following the 1958 U.S. deployment of tactical nuclear weapons in South Korea, the North Korean government asked both the Soviet Union and China for help in developing nuclear weapons, but was refused by both. However, the Soviet Union agreed to help North Korea develop a peaceful nuclear energy program, including the training of nuclear scientists.

Eventually this technology base developed into a clandestine nuclear weapons program, leading to the 2006 and 2009 nuclear tests. In 2009, it was estimated that North Korea had up to ten functional nuclear warheads. After the death of Kim Jong-il in December 2011, the IAEA announced its readiness to return nuclear inspectors to North Korea, from which they were expelled in 2009, as soon as an agreement could be reached on steps towards denuclearization. Nonetheless, in early 2013, North Korea pledged to conduct more nuclear tests in the near future, and its third nuclear test took place in February 2013.
 
evince said:
this is post 7

prove its a lie idiot
Click to expand...

Now, you can go and suck Jarod's dick.

Nuclear power in North Korea

Nuclear weapons program

Following the 1958 U.S. deployment of tactical nuclear weapons in South Korea, the North Korean government asked both the Soviet Union and China for help in developing nuclear weapons, but was refused by both. However, the Soviet Union agreed to help North Korea develop a peaceful nuclear energy program, including the training of nuclear scientists.

Eventually this technology base developed into a clandestine nuclear weapons program, leading to the 2006 and 2009 nuclear tests. In 2009, it was estimated that North Korea had up to ten functional nuclear warheads. After the death of Kim Jong-il in December 2011, the IAEA announced its readiness to return nuclear inspectors to North Korea, from which they were expelled in 2009, as soon as an agreement could be reached on steps towards denuclearization. Nonetheless, in early 2013, North Korea pledged to conduct more nuclear tests in the near future, and its third nuclear test took place in February 2013.
 
Truth Detector said:
Seriously? You need proof that Kim wasn't developing nukes long before Trump's election??? Are you an idiot; or just play one on JPP?
Click to expand...

You need to work on your reading comprehension.

We can't begin to have an honest discussion until you can accurately quote other people's comments.
 
Yurt said:
North Korea, as far as the news has mentioned, has been testing nukes since 2006.

Now what evince, does the truth matter to you?
Click to expand...

TESTING nukes and HAVING nuclear weapons are two totally different things.

I guess you aren't bright enough to make such a distinction.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Not everyone agrees.

From the link YOU provided:

"United States officials suggested the device may have been a nuclear explosive that misfired."

A FAILED test does NOT a nuclear warhead make.

Still waiting for you to prove Jarod lied.
Click to expand...

There is a difference in stating 'they had no nukes' and 'they did not have the capacity to deliver the nukes via ICBM (or even intermediate range missiles)'.

They had nukes in 2006. They did not have the capacity to strike the US with them in 2006.

Try understanding the technology. They could have lobbed a nuke at South Korea in 2006.

Saying they 'had no nukes until Trump is blatantly false'.
 
Superfreak said:
There is a difference in stating 'they had no nukes' and 'they did not have the capacity to deliver the nukes via ICBM (or even intermediate range missiles)'.

They had nukes in 2006. They did not have the capacity to strike the US with them in 2006.

Try understanding the technology. They could have lobbed a nuke at South Korea in 2006.

Saying they 'had no nukes until Trump is blatantly false'.
Click to expand...

I see Jarod was found to be in contempt of court, for lying, and has voluntarily left. :laugh:
 
ZappasGuitar said:
You need to work on your reading comprehension.

We can't begin to have an honest discussion until you can accurately quote other people's comments.
Click to expand...

You need to work on your honesty skills.

We can't have a coherent discussion until you stop being a dishonest dumb fuck.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top