Kavanaugh Will 'Likely' Be Investigated for Perjury

evince said:
by republicans


the documents are all in the government records idiot

they exist


they record these things


He said he didn't know they were documents stolen from the Democratic party.


then the documents came out years later


they prove he lied


they exist

its his own words idiot
Click to expand...

That isn't what he said. You are not Enlightened, you are a dark liar of evil arts.

No longer shall the dark overcome the light. Your lies are in your face.
 
evince said:
Kavanaugh said to Hatch in 2004 that he didn’t receive “documents that appeared to [me] to have been drafted or prepared by Democratic staff members of the Senate Judiciary Committee.” He said to Sen. Chuck Schumer in 2004 that “Mr. Miranda never provided these documents” and that he had never “come across memos from internal files of any Democratic members.” And Kavanaugh said to Kennedy in 2006, “I do know that I never received any memos.”
The bar for a lie here is to demonstrate that Kavanaugh had received any memos from Democratic staff or documents from Miranda that appeared drafted or prepared by Democratic judiciary staffers. By the plainest meaning of those words, Kavanaugh received both things.
Documents released last week reveal that in early 2003, Miranda sent Kavanaugh an email with the subject line “Judiciary Dems obstruct on reorganization.” That email contained a draft letter from Democratic Judiciary Committee members to Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle laying out their desired negotiating position over a new process for judicial confirmations. Miranda indicated to Kavanaugh that the document was not public at the time he sent it, saying, “I am told that all [Democrats] on the [Judiciary Committee]” were signing on to the document.



it is documented folks


he said over and over under oath that he didn't know


then the documents PROVE he knew they were Democratic party documents STOLEN by republicans
Click to expand...

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/...eme-court.html
 
evince said:
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/...eme-court.html
Click to expand...
Kavanaugh said to Hatch in 2004 that he didn’t receive “documents that appeared to [me] to have been drafted or prepared by Democratic staff members of the Senate Judiciary Committee.” He said to Sen. Chuck Schumer in 2004 that “Mr. Miranda never provided these documents” and that he had never “come across memos from internal files of any Democratic members.” And Kavanaugh said to Kennedy in 2006, “I do know that I never received any memos.”
The bar for a lie here is to demonstrate that Kavanaugh had received any memos from Democratic staff or documents from Miranda that appeared drafted or prepared by Democratic judiciary staffers. By the plainest meaning of those words, Kavanaugh received both things.
Documents released last week reveal that in early 2003, Miranda sent Kavanaugh an email with the subject line “Judiciary Dems obstruct on reorganization.” That email contained a draft letter from Democratic Judiciary Committee members to Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle laying out their desired negotiating position over a new process for judicial confirmations. Miranda indicated to Kavanaugh that the document was not public at the time he sent it, saying, “I am told that all [Democrats] on the [Judiciary Committee]” were signing on to the document.



it is documented folks


he said over and over under oath that he didn't know


then the documents PROVE he knew they were Democratic party documents STOLEN by republicans
 
Evince:

If you received a thousand documents and you were positive you didn't receive this one document, would it be a lie if you said you never received it? Would it be a lie if you said, maybe I did, but I never saw it?

Answer truthfully now.
 
Enlightened One said:
Evince:

If you received a thousand documents and you were positive you didn't receive this one document, would it be a lie if you said you never received it? Would it be a lie if you said, maybe I did, but I never saw it?

Answer truthfully now.
Click to expand...

dude read what was posted

the newly released documents show him commenting on a STOLEN Democratic party document which is also in the record from HIS FILES and in his own words he says what the document is.

he recognizes it as an internal Democratic party document

they ONLY way he could have it is by theft


he knew that it was stolen


and like I said you are denying the facts given you


tell putin the gig is up mmmkay
 
#MAGA said:
He did say that. You should go back and listen again. Google is your friend.

If you don't do it, you are conceding I am correct
Click to expand...

childlike denial

I guess they like shoving their fingers up putins ass to pretend they have some point
 
Bourbon said:
House Democrat:



2018-10-20T010926Z_1_LYNXNPEE9J01U_RTROPTP_3_USA-COURT-KAVANAUGH-RECUSAL.jpg


Rep. Joe Neguse (D., Colo.) said Friday that the House Judiciary Committee will “likely” investigate perjury charges against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

Joe Neguse, a freshman member of the Judiciary Committee, made the comments to a group of his constituents on Friday. He said that he was very concerned about perjury claims against Kavanaugh and that his committee may take steps to impeach him depending on their findings.

“There’s no question Kavanaugh committed perjury during the confirmation hearings and so forth,” Neguse said when asked if he planned to pursue Kavanaugh’s impeachment. “I think the Judiciary Committee is likely to take that up.”


Neguse’s comments apparently are consistent with comments on the same topic made by House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler (D., N.Y.). It was reported that Nadler had also discussed the possibility of impeaching Kavanaugh days after the midterm elections. - PoliticusUSA
Click to expand...

Now that they control the House, they can launch any investigation they want. No need for silly details like probable cause. Totalitarian lefty scumbags love that kind of stuff, as long as it's being used against the other side.
 
OH BY THE WAY


the republicans had it pointed out to them that Kavanaugh lied


they ignored it and placed him on the SCOTUS
 
evince said:
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/...eme-court.html
Click to expand...

Kavanaugh said to Hatch in 2004 that he didn’t receive “documents that appeared to [me] to have been drafted or prepared by Democratic staff members of the Senate Judiciary Committee.” He said to Sen. Chuck Schumer in 2004 that “Mr. Miranda never provided these documents” and that he had never “come across memos from internal files of any Democratic members.” And Kavanaugh said to Kennedy in 2006, “I do know that I never received any memos.”
The bar for a lie here is to demonstrate that Kavanaugh had received any memos from Democratic staff or documents from Miranda that appeared drafted or prepared by Democratic judiciary staffers. By the plainest meaning of those words, Kavanaugh received both things.
Documents released last week reveal that in early 2003, Miranda sent Kavanaugh an email with the subject line “Judiciary Dems obstruct on reorganization.” That email contained a draft letter from Democratic Judiciary Committee members to Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle laying out their desired negotiating position over a new process for judicial confirmations. Miranda indicated to Kavanaugh that the document was not public at the time he sent it, saying, “I am told that all [Democrats] on the [Judiciary Committee]” were signing on to the document.



it is documented folks


he said over and over under oath that he didn't know


then the documents PROVE he knew they were Democratic party documents STOLEN by republicans
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top