This is be very costly for the American people, long term. There have been various studies of the impact of nutrition assistance for the poor. As you'd expect (unless you're neck-deep in right-wing rhetoric), kids from poor families wind up as much more productive and less dependent adults if they get enough assistance to meet their nutritional needs, during their formative years, than if they're deprived. Basically, the studies followed up on "natural experiments" where welfare benefits were rolled out at different times or to different degrees from one state to another. They compared like-situated poor kids, where some got assistance and others didn't. With nutrition being such an important factor in brain development and academic performance, the kids that got assistance were a lot more likely to grow up to be contributing members of society. The kids that didn't were a lot more likely to grow up to be mentally or physically disabled, criminal, or otherwise a burden on the rest of us. So, if we cut costs in the short term by cutting food stamps, the long-term costs will be huge.