Is Special Counsel Mueller’s Office About to Have Its First Conviction Overturned?

noise said:
what "blackmail",, and no it doesn't.
Yates used the Logan act as a cover of "illegal activities" to bring in the FBI

https://thedeepstate.com/case-entrapment-deep-state-brought-michael-flynn/
It is now conclusively established that there was nothing unlawful about Flynn’s conversations with Kislyak (see below) whilst Yates’s claim that Flynn had exposed himself to blackmail by the Russians by lying to Pence and others about his conversations with Kislyak is too ridiculous to be taken seriously.

McGahn’s reported initial reaction to Yates’s complaint – “Why does it matter to the Department of Justice whether one White House official lies to another White House official?” – was the correct one.
Click to expand...

"Noise" you got to let it go with this "deep state" narrative

I showed you up above, you read off a right wing website who copied it from a discredited website and it was authored by a disbarred lawyer who works for Putin

Forgot it and what it says
 
archives said:
"Noise" you got to let it go with this "deep state" narrative

I showed you up above, you read off a right wing website who copied it from a discredited website and it was authored by a disbarred lawyer who works for Putin

Forgot it and what it says
Click to expand...

you have become a waste of time dodging to "deep state" and not addressing the points.
There is more then enough of that around here, go play with others that dodge debate -not me

it is now conclusively established that there was nothing unlawful about Flynn’s conversations with Kislyak (see below) whilst Yates’s claim that Flynn had exposed himself to blackmail by the Russians by lying to Pence and others about his conversations with Kislyak is too ridiculous to be taken seriously.

McGahn’s reported initial reaction to Yates’s complaint – “Why does it matter to the Department of Justice whether one White House official lies to another White House official?” – was the correct one.
Click to expand...
 
Havana Moon said:
Give me a fucking break, he lied to Pence and the FBI asked him about that in an informal setting without declaring in advance what was really going on!!
Click to expand...

What a minute, you actually think Flynn, who has had a career in the intelligence field at the highest levels, had no clue what was going on when FBI agents asked him about recent conversations he had with high ranking Russian officials?

Beginning to understand why you ban posters
 
Liberals are in for one dark day, very soon.
Mueller is on his last chapter, book to be released soon.

Only thing left to ponder will be if the Democrats are stupid enough to think America wants 2 years of investigations and committees looking into more nothing burgers, or why Trump paid a porno star to keep her mouth shut, which of course porn stars find impossible to do.
while Trump continues to improve our lives

But I'm betting they're too stupid, matter of fact count on it
 
noise said:
you have become a waste of time dodging to "deep state" and not addressing the points.
There is more then enough of that around here, go play with others that dodge debate -not me
Click to expand...

You aren't making any point, all you are doing is repeating the narrative you read off of the questionable website as if they were facts to basis your arguement why Flynn was framed

It would be like another poster employing an article off of the "Onion" and using what it said to establish a point, your sources are erroneous
 
Getin the ring said:
Liberals are in for one dark day, very soon.
Mueller is on his last chapter, book to be released soon.

Only thing left to ponder will be if the Democrats are stupid enough to think America wants 2 years of investigations and committees looking into nothing burgers,
while Trump continues to improve our lives

But I'm betting they're too stupid, matter of fact count on it
Click to expand...

Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, and hoping

Didn't think it was possible for one person to be so wrong so many times in one post
 
whatever you say, proceed with the nothing burger committees and see what happens in 2020

liberals have been wrong on every prediction since (before) trump took office, does that not register with you
 
The uselessness is the unwillingness to accept the finality of Flynn's sentencing and the subsequent unfolding of the Mueller investigation.
 
Getin the ring said:
whatever you say, proceed with the nothing burger committees and see what happens in 2020

liberals have been wrong on every prediction since (before) trump took office, does that not register with you
Click to expand...

The only committees "investigating" now are Republican Committees trying hard to establish a deflection off of Trump's difficulties, are you saying these committees are pursing nothingburgers? Not many Trumpkins who would finally admit that fact
 
archives said:
What a minute, you actually think Flynn, who has had a career in the intelligence field at the highest levels, had no clue what was going on when FBI agents asked him about recent conversations he had with high ranking Russian officials?

Beginning to understand why you ban posters
Click to expand...

All the more reason to not lie.

The interviewing agents said Flynn was relaxed and showed no signs of lying. But somewhere along the line, someone, decided Flynn lied in the interview. And per usual, no one is allowed to see the facts.

Mullet better have his ducks in row with Judge Sullivan or he’ll throw it out.
 
Getin the ring said:
Liberals are in for one dark day, very soon.
Mueller is on his last chapter, book to be released soon.

Only thing left to ponder will be if the Democrats are stupid enough to think America wants 2 years of investigations and committees looking into more nothing burgers, or why Trump paid a porno star to keep her mouth shut, which of course porn stars find impossible to do.
while Trump continues to improve our lives

But I'm betting they're too stupid, matter of fact count on it
Click to expand...

You been saying that for a long tome. When will Flynn move to set aside his guilty plea?
 
archives said:
You aren't making any point, all you are doing is repeating the narrative you read off of the questionable website as if they were facts to basis your arguement why Flynn was framed

It would be like another poster employing an article off of the "Onion" and using what it said to establish a point, your sources are erroneous
Click to expand...
once again you do not address my points only the source. If I am quoting a web site it's because I agree with the points.

There is no question the 302 was changed from contemporaneous noted to an interview with Strzok
( but no the other guy) more then once

You have deliberate lying by Mccabe for the reason of the meeting, and when questioned about the FBI reasoning
Mccabe specifically told Flynn he did not need a lawyer -
despite it that being a criminal investigation on Flynn
etc
etc.

Lastly a WAPO reporter is on record that they have never been able to verify most of Steele -
yet that was the basis for the counter-intelligence investigation

Strzok, Mueller, Comey et all .McCabe,Baker, Brenna,Clapper are all corrupt.
Why would you believe ANY of them?..
you know why..because the are out to Kill Trump and that's all Dems care about. *damn the legal torpedoes*
 
noise said:
once again you do not address my points only the source. If I am quoting a web site it's because I agree with the points.

There is no question the 302 was changed from contemporaneous noted to an interview with Strzok
( but no the other guy) more then once

You have deliberate lying by Mccabe for the reason of the meeting, and when questioned about the FBI reasoning
Mccabe specifically told Flynn he did not need a lawyer -
despite it that being a criminal investigation on Flynn
etc
etc.

Lastly a WAPO reporter is on record that they have never been able to verify most of Steele -
yet that was the basis for the counter-intelligence investigation

Strzok, Mueller, Comey et all .McCabe,Baker, Brenna,Clapper are all corrupt.
Why would you believe ANY of them?..
you know why..because the are out to Kill Trump and that's all Dems care about. *damn the legal torpedoes*
Click to expand...

Archie is a wanker, I personally can't be bothered with him.
 
archives said:
What a minute, you actually think Flynn, who has had a career in the intelligence field at the highest levels, had no clue what was going on when FBI agents asked him about recent conversations he had with high ranking Russian officials?

Beginning to understand why you ban posters
Click to expand...

Fuck off, cunt!!
 
noise said:
once again you do not address my points only the source. If I am quoting a web site it's because I agree with the points.

There is no question the 302 was changed from contemporaneous noted to an interview with Strzok
( but no the other guy) more then once

You have deliberate lying by Mccabe for the reason of the meeting, and when questioned about the FBI reasoning
Mccabe specifically told Flynn he did not need a lawyer -
despite it that being a criminal investigation on Flynn
etc
etc.

Lastly a WAPO reporter is on record that they have never been able to verify most of Steele -
yet that was the basis for the counter-intelligence investigation

Strzok, Mueller, Comey et all .McCabe,Baker, Brenna,Clapper are all corrupt.
Why would you believe ANY of them?..
you know why..because the are out to Kill Trump and that's all Dems care about. *damn the legal torpedoes*
Click to expand...

Bingo. The last paragraph was a torpedo in it’s own right.

McCabe lied about an actual crime and has yet to be indicted for it. The man who is guilty of the EXACT SAME CRIME as Flynn was calling the shots on Flynn’s interview. The guy who lied to cover up a crime is still Scott-free while the guy [a bonafide war hero, no less] that lied about a non-crime gets financally ruined. Because, Trump.

Well, isn’t that just dandy?

And Strzok was fired for extreme anti-Trump animus [TDS] and fashioning anti-Trump ‘insurance policies’ with ‘Andy’. ‘Den of snakes’ is too gentle a metaphor for these jokers.

But just wait a damn minute: how can either of these two individuals be involved in an attempt to prosecute Flynn. That’s not a typo. We all know nobody cares about Flynn’s *inconsequential conversation* with the agents—whether he lied or didn’t lie doesn’t matter to anything EXCEPT the investigation of Donald Trump. Nobody cares about Manafort for the exact reasons.

It’s like the foxes were left in charge of prosecuting the hen house. Flynn’s charge should be thrown out but our justice system has gone banana republic.

And it’s happening right before our eyes.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top